Content area
Full text
ABSTRACT
Objective. The editorial practices and policies of scientific journals that were uncomfortable for authors were identified with the objective of eliciting feedback to enhance collaboration between authors and editors.
Methodology. The focus group technique was employed. Based on the content of the discussions, a descriptive analysis of the primary concepts was conducted, represented by word mapping and a tree-map. Subsequently, the codes obtained were categorized into four dimensions: (1) editorial standards and formats, (2) selection and acceptance process, (3) peer review and evaluation, and (4) role of editors.
Results. The most frequently cited issues by the focus group participants were delays in the editorial process and a perceived lack of editorial transparency. Other challenges identified include the following: (1) a lack of clarity in standards, primarily due to the inconsistency in editorial requirements; (2) a lack of adequate feedback; (3) limitation in the number of authors; and (4) constraints in the number of publications.
Conclusions. A critical and reflective approach was employed to examine the editorial practices that affect scientific production. The necessity for reforms in the publishing system to enhance the quality, equity, and efficiency of the publication process was emphasized, with the aim of ensuring that scientific progress can significantly benefit global knowledge. Through a concerted and collaborative effort between authors, editors, and reviewers, it will be possible to pursue a trajectory of continuous improvement, wherein the advancement of high-quality scientific research will continue to be facilitated.
Keywords: editorial practices; editorial policies; scientific journals; academic editorial process; academic editor; peer review.
1. INTRODUCTION
THE DISSEMINATION of scientific research findings is a vital component of the global advancement of knowledge. The role of academic publications in spreading scientific research findings is of great importance. The editors of these publications, in particular the editors-in-chief, play a pivotal role in ensuring the rigor and credibility of published studies (Ashford, 2013; Colquitt & George, 2011; Geletkanycz & Tepper, 2012; Grant & Pollock, 2011). Researchers typically choose to publish their findings in scientific journals when they seek the evaluation and critique of experts in their respective fields. Despite the controversies surrounding peer review, it is evident that it plays an indispensable role in ensuring the quality and credibility of scientific publications (Deroy Dominguez, 2022; Nino, 2024;...