It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The carbon intensity (CI) of corn ethanol, the primary renewable fuel used in transportation, has been actively researched and quantified over the last three decades. Reliable estimates of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for corn ethanol are important since these values help determine significant policy and market decisions on state, national, and international levels. We reviewed well-to-wheel GHG life cycle analyses (LCAs) for corn ethanol and evaluated models, input data, and results for farming, fuel production, co-product credit, land use change (LUC), transport of feedstock and fuel, tailpipe, and denaturant. Compared to earlier analyses, recent LCAs for corn ethanol contain updates to modeling systems and data that reflect: (a) market-driven changes in corn production that lowered the intensity of fertilizer and fossil fuel use on farms; (b) more efficient use of natural gas and recent electric generation mix data for energy consumed at ethanol refineries, and (c) LUC analyses based on hybrid economic-biophysical models that account for land conversion, land productivity, and land intensification. LCAs that include these latest developments yield a central best estimate of CI for corn ethanol of 51.4 gCO2e MJ−1 (range of 37.6–65.1 gCO2e MJ−1) which is 46% lower than the average CI for neat gasoline. The largest components of total CI are ethanol production (29.6 gCO2e MJ−1, 58% of total) and farming practices net of co-product credit (13.2 gCO2e MJ−1, 26%), while LUC is a minor contributor (3.9 gCO2e MJ−1, 7%). Market conditions that favor greater adoption of precision agriculture systems, retention of soil organic carbon, and demand for co-products from ethanol production may lower the CI of corn ethanol further. Continued refinement of models to account for co-products, conservation of soil carbon, and direct and indirect LUC is expected to produce ever more accurate estimates in the future.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Environmental Health & Engineering, Inc., Newton, MA 02459, United States of America
2 Sustainability and Health Initiative for NetPositive Enterprise (SHINE), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States of America
3 Environmental Health & Engineering, Inc., Newton, MA 02459, United States of America; The Gerald J. and Dorothy R. Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111, United States of America
4 Environmental Health & Engineering, Inc., Newton, MA 02459, United States of America; Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, United States of America