It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
A central question in neuroscience is how self-organizing dynamic interactions in the brain emerge on their relatively static structural backbone. Due to the complexity of spatial and temporal dependencies between different brain areas, fully comprehending the interplay between structure and function is still challenging and an area of intense research. In this paper we present a graph neural network (GNN) framework, to describe functional interactions based on the structural anatomical layout. A GNN allows us to process graph-structured spatio-temporal signals, providing a possibility to combine structural information derived from diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) with temporal neural activity profiles, like that observed in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Moreover, dynamic interactions between different brain regions discovered by this data-driven approach can provide a multi-modal measure of causal connectivity strength. We assess the proposed model’s accuracy by evaluating its capabilities to replicate empirically observed neural activation profiles, and compare the performance to those of a vector auto regression (VAR), like that typically used in Granger causality. We show that GNNs are able to capture long-term dependencies in data and also computationally scale up to the analysis of large-scale networks. Finally we confirm that features learned by a GNN can generalize across MRI scanner types and acquisition protocols, by demonstrating that the performance on small datasets can be improved by pre-training the GNN on data from an earlier study. We conclude that the proposed multi-modal GNN framework can provide a novel perspective on the structure-function relationship in the brain. Accordingly this approach appears to be promising for the characterization of the information flow in brain networks.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 CIML, Biophysics, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany (GRID:grid.7727.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2190 5763); Experimental Psychology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany (GRID:grid.7727.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2190 5763)
2 Experimental Psychology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany (GRID:grid.7727.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2190 5763)
3 IEETA/DETI, Universidade de Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal (GRID:grid.7311.4) (ISNI:0000000123236065)
4 Brown University, Department of Cognitive, Linguistic,and Psychological Sciences, Providence, USA (GRID:grid.40263.33) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9094)
5 CIML, Biophysics, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany (GRID:grid.7727.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2190 5763)