It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Otoliths are commonly used to discriminate between fish stocks, through both elemental composition and otolith shape. Typical studies also have a large number of elemental compositions and shape measures relative to the number of otolith samples, with these measures exhibiting strong mean–variance relationships. These properties make otolith composition and shape data highly suitable for use within a multivariate generalised linear model (MGLM) framework, yet MGLMs have never been applied to otolith data. Here we apply both a traditional distance based permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) and MGLMs to a case study of striped snakehead (Channa striata) in India. We also introduce the Tweedie and gamma distributions as suitable error structures for the MGLMs, drawing similarities to the properties of Biomass data. We demonstrate that otolith elemental data and combined otolith elemental and shape data violate the assumption of homogeneity of variance of PERMANOVA and may give misleading results, while the assumptions of the MGLM with Tweedie and gamma distributions are shown to be satisfied and are appropriate for both otolith shape and elemental composition data. Consistent differences between three groups of C. striata were identified using otolith shape, otolith chemistry and a combined otolith shape and chemistry dataset. This suggests that future research should be conducted into whether there are demographic differences between these groups which may influence management considerations. The MGLM method is widely applicable and could be applied to any multivariate otolith shape or elemental composition dataset.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Aligarh Muslim University, Section of Fishery Science and Aquaculture, Department of Zoology, Aligarh, India (GRID:grid.411340.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0765)
2 UNSW Australia, Centre for Marine Science & Innovation, Sydney, Australia (GRID:grid.1005.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 4902 0432); Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Mosman, Australia (GRID:grid.493042.8)
3 Analytical Chemistry Division, CSIR- Indian Institute of Toxicology Research, Lucknow, India (GRID:grid.417638.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2194 5503)
4 UNSW Australia, Mark Wainwright Analytical Centre, Sydney, Australia (GRID:grid.1005.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 4902 0432)