It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Distinguishing between natural forests from exotic tree plantations is essential to get an accurate picture of the world’s state of forests. Most exotic tree plantations support lower levels of biodiversity and have less potential for ecosystem services supply than natural forests, and differencing them is still a challenge using standard tools. We use a novel approach in south-central of Chile to differentiate tree cover dynamics among natural forests and exotic tree plantations. Chile has one of the world’s most competitive forestry industry and the region is a global biodiversity hotspot. Our collaborative visual interpretation method combined a global database of tree cover change, remote sensing from high-resolution satellite images and expert knowledge. By distinguishing exotic tree plantation and natural forest loss, we fit spatially explicit models to estimate tree-cover loss across 40 millions of ha between 2000 and 2016. We were able to distinguish natural forests from exotic tree plantations with an overall accuracy of 99% and predicted forest loss. Total tree cover loss was continuous over time, and the disaggregation revealed that 1 549 909 ha of tree plantations were lost (mean = 96 869 ha year−1), while 206 142 ha corresponded to natural forest loss (mean = 12 884 ha year−1). Mostly of tree plantations lost returned to be plantation (51%). Natural forests were converted mainly (75%) to transitional land covers (e.g. shrubland, bare land, grassland), and an important proportion of these may finish as tree plantation. This replacement may undermine objectives of increasedcarbon storage and biodiversity. Tree planting as a solution has gained increased attention in recen years with ambitious commitments to mitigate the effects of climate change. However, negative outcomes for the environment could result if strategies incentivize the replacement of natural forests into other land covers. Initiatives to reduce carbon emissions should encourage differentiating natural forests from exotic tree plantations and pay more attention on protecting and managing sustainably the former.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Miranda, Alejandro 2 ; Aplin, Paul 3
; Carrasco, Jaime 4 ; Catalán, Germán 5 ; Cayuela, Luis 6 ; Fuentes-Castillo, Taryn 7 ; Hernández, Angela 8 ; Martínez-Harms, María J 9 ; Peluso, Franco 10 ; Prado, Marco 11 ; Reyes-Riveros, Rosa 5
; Tracy Van Holt 12 ; Vergara, Cristian 13 ; Zamorano-Elgueta, Carlos 14 ; Carlos Di Bella 15 1 Landscape Ecology and Conservation Lab, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Forestales, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile; Butamallin Research Center for Global Change, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Forestales, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile
2 Landscape Ecology and Conservation Lab, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Forestales, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile; Center for Climate and Resilience Research (CR2), Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
3 Department of Geography and Geology, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, United Kingdom
4 Industrial Engineering Department, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Complex Engineering System Institute—ISCI, Santiago, Chile
5 Landscape Ecology and Conservation Lab, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Forestales, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile; Doctorado en Ciencias Agroalimentarias y Medioambiente, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Forestales, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile
6 Department of Biology, Geology, Physics and Inorganic Chemistry, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain
7 Instituto de Geografía, Facultad de Historia, Geografía y Ciencia Política, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
8 Centro de Investigación en Ecosistemas de la Patagonia (CIEP), Coyhaique, Chile
9 Center for Applied Ecology and Sustainability (CAPES), Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
10 Instituto de Clima y Agua, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (CIRN-INTA Castelar), Hurlingham, Buenos Aires, Argentina
11 Landscape Ecology and Conservation Lab, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Forestales, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile
12 Center for Sustainable Business, Leonard N. Stern School of Business, New York University, New York, United States of America
13 Laboratorio de Planificación Territorial, Departamento de Ciencias Ambientales, Facultad de Recursos Naturales—Universidad Católica de Temuco, Coyhaique, Chile
14 Universidad de Aysen, Coyhaique, Chile
15 Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Agronomía, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Argentina




