It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The LiFePOVC battery has been widely used in many fields, and its safety problems are gradually attracting widespread concern. In this paper, two kinds of LiFePO4/C batteries with 25 Ah and 200 Ah were taken as research objects. The thermal runaway phenomena of two batteries were analyzed, and the difference of thermal runaway phenomena between two batteries were compared. The results show that the safety valve of the 200 Ah battery ruptures earlier and the thermal runaway occurs earlier under the same overcharge rate. The work provides a reference for the protection design of LiFePO4/C batteries.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 State Key Laboratory of Operation and Control of Renewable Energy & Storage Systems, China Electric Power Research Institute. Beijing 100192, China.
2 Beijing Institute of Technology, 100081, China.
3 State Grid Anhui Electric Power CO. LTD, Hefei, 230000, China.