An engineered membrane-bound guanylyl cyclase with light-switchable activity

Abstract

Background

Microbial rhodopsins vary in their chemical properties, from light sensitive ion transport to different enzymatic activities. Recently, a novel family of two-component Cyclase (rhod)opsins (2c-Cyclop) from the green algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and Volvox carteri was characterized, revealing a light-inhibited guanylyl cyclase (GC) activity. More genes similar to 2c-Cyclop exist in algal genomes, but their molecular and physiological functions remained uncharacterized.

Results

Chlamyopsin-5 (Cop5) from C. reinhardtii is related to Cr2c-Cyclop1 (Cop6) and can be expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes, but shows no GC activity. Here, we exchanged parts of Cop5 with the corresponding ones of Cr2c-Cyclop1. When exchanging the opsin part of Cr2c-Cyclop1 with that of Cop5, we obtained a bi-stable guanylyl cyclase (switch-Cyclop1) whose activity can be switched by short light flashes. The GC activity of switch-Cyclop1 is increased for hours by a short 380 nm illumination and switched off (20-fold decreased) by blue or green light. switch-Cyclop1 is very light-sensitive and can half-maximally be activated by ~ 150 photons/nm² of 380 nm (~ 73 J/m²) or inhibited by ~ 40 photons/nm² of 473 nm (~ 18 J/m²).

Conclusions

This engineered guanylyl cyclase is the first light-switchable enzyme for cGMP level regulation. Light-regulated cGMP production with high light-sensitivity is a promising technique for the non-invasive investigation of the effects of cGMP signaling in many different tissues.

Background

Microbial rhodopsins are important photoreceptors for microorganisms such as archaea, bacteria, giant viruses [1] and lower eukaryotes including algae, fungi, and choanoflagellates [2, 3]. The different rhodopsins function as light sensors with very different output function.

As an active light-responsive microorganism, the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii was predicted to contain about 10 opsin genes in the genome [4, 5], some of them with hypothetical cyclase activity. Only after covalent binding of the opsin to the light-absorbing chromophore all-trans retinal (vitamin A) the protein becomes light-sensitive and functional; it is then called rhodopsin. However, until now, only three rhodopsin molecules are functionally characterized [6,7,8] and two of them with confirmed physiological function [9]. The first hypothesized “opsins,” Chlamyopsin-1 and 2 (Cop1, Cop2) [10], show no homology to the other authentic Chlamydomonas opsins and are not transmembrane proteins [8, 11] and therefore should not be regarded as “opsins.” Their Volvox carteri homolog Vop1 was exclusively found at the oldest basal bodies of the embryo and on the corresponding d-roots and was renamed “basal body protein-1” (Babo1 [11]). Cop3 and Cop4 (originally named CSRA and CSRB for “Chlamydomonas Sensory Rhodopsins A and B”) were the first two authentic Chlamydomonas opsins, shown to function physiologically as phototaxis receptors of C. reinhardtii [9]. The molecules Cop3 and Cop4 were characterized after heterologous expression as direct light-gated cation channels and named Channelrhodopsin-1 and 2 [6, 7]. We recently characterized the activity of a very large opsin from C. reinhardtii: Cr2c-Cyclop1 (Cop6). Cr2c-Cyclop1 was determined as ATP-dependent and light-inhibited guanylyl cyclase with an action spectrum peaking at ~ 540 nm [8]. Also, the V. carteri homolog is large and shows similar function [8].

In contrast to the classical 7-TM (seven transmembrane helices) topology of rhodopsins, the opsin domain of Cr2c-Cyclop1 contains eight transmembrane helices, with cytosolic N- and C-terminus, as all other so far identified enzyme rhodopsins, like the light-activated guanylyl cyclase from Blastocladiella emersonii—BeCyclop [12,13,14,15]—and the light-sensitive phosphodiesterase RhoPDE [16]. Interestingly, all three classes of microbial enzyme rhodopsins, discovered so far, are related to regulation of cGMP concentration by light. As these light-regulated enzymes were shown to be functionally expressed in mammalian cells, they are promising tools in cGMP research and are even considered as possible candidates for gene therapy.

Another opsin with homology to Cr2c-Cyclop1, Cop5 from C. reinhardtii, has a similar domain architecture as Cr2c-Cyclop1. But expression of Cop5 did not yield guanylyl cyclase (GC) activity [8]. This might be because of its GC domain which lacks several key residues, playing roles in metal ion and GTP binding as well as in transition state-stabilization, required for cGMP production. If Cop5 plays a functional role in the alga, this function might result from a heterodimer formation with a yet unidentified cyclase domain in vivo. Although Cop5 could be expressed in the plasma membrane of oocytes from X. laevis [8], purification of the full-length protein was not achieved until now. However, the Cop5 rhodopsin part (HKR1) was purified after heterologous expression in the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris and studied with spectroscopic methods. It was determined as an UV-A receptor with an absorption spectrum peaking at 380 nm. Its two isoforms Rh-UV and Rh-Bl are finely tuned by UV-A and blue light and thermally stable in the dark. The excited state lifetimes of Rh-UV and Rh-Bl were shown to be greater than 1 h [17,18,19,20].

In this study, we aimed to determine if (and which) parts of Cop5 are able to transmit an absorbed light signal, by fusing them to the corresponding functional GC domain of Cr2c-Cyclop1. Therefore, we generated chimeras between Cop5 and Cr2c-Cyclop1. We obtained a bi-stable two-component cyclase opsin (switch-Cyclop), which can be switched on for hours by a short 380 nm light flash and then switched off with blue or green but not with red light. The ratio of GC activity in the activated state to activity in the inhibited state is up to 20. This designed two-component cyclase opsin is very sensitive to UV-A and blue light. After a short UV-A stimulation, the GC activity is stable for at least 6 h in the dark, which can then be inhibited by a short blue or green light pulse. The engineered switch-Cyclop should be useful to regulate cGMP concentration in different cells or live animals by switching between UV-A and blue/green light pulses.

Results

The opsin domain of Cop5 enables light color-signaling

Our previous study showed that Cop5 can be expressed in oocytes of X. laevis but that no guanylyl cyclase activity can be detected whereas Cop6 (Cr2c-Cyclop1) was demonstrated to be a light-inhibited guanylyl cyclase [8]. Sequence alignment shows that the GC domain of Cop5 is missing several key residues required for metal ion binding, base recognition, ribose-orienting, and transition state-stabilization in the cGMP production process (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Therefore, three chimeras of Cop5 and Cr2c-Cyclop1 were designed for fusion of corresponding fragments at regions of high homology and outside predicted domains. All three chimeras retained the complete opsin part of Cop5.

The chimeras were fused:

1. 1)

After the opsin domain of Cop5 (Chimera 1, C1),

2. 2)

Before the histidine kinase domain of Cr2c-Cyclop1 (Chimera 2, C2),

3. 3)

After the histidine kinase domain of Cop5 (Chimera 3, C3) (Fig. 1).

[IMAGE OMITTED: SEE PDF]

The chimeras were expressed in X. laevis oocytes and guanylyl cyclase (GC) activities of membrane extracts were measured in an established in-vitro assay [8, 12, 16]. Chimeras C1 and C2 showed a low GC activity in the dark and in 473 nm light but higher GC activity with 380 nm illumination (Fig. 2a and b). The ratio of activity under these preliminary test conditions of UV-A and blue illumination was determined to be 15 and 12 for C1 and C2, respectively.

[IMAGE OMITTED: SEE PDF]

Chimera C3 showed only a low GC activity, compared to C1 and C2, with no difference between the dark, UV-A, and blue light conditions (Fig. 2c). This implies that the His kinase domain from Cop5 is not functional or not compatible with the response regulator domain of Cr2c-Cyclop1. For further investigation, we focus on C1 because of its light-sensitivity with the highest activation ratio.

The engineered chimera C1 is bistably regulated by UV-A and blue/green light

After confirming the UV-activated GC activity of C1, we designed experiments to test whether C1 showed a bi-stable character, as might be predicted from the spectroscopic studies [17,18,19,20]. As shown in Fig. 3a, a short (30 s) 380-nm light pulse could activate the GC activity of C1 which continued in the dark. We then tested the inhibition effect with light of different wavelengths on UV-A-activated switch-Cyclop1. A 30-s (380 nm) UV-A illumination was applied in the beginning, and then the samples were either kept in the dark or in 473 nm blue light, 532 nm green light, 593 nm orange light, or 635 nm red light to measure GC activity. As shown before, the GC activity remained high in the dark. The UV-A-evoked GC activity can be efficiently turned down by 4.8 μW/mm2 473 nm blue and 532 nm green light (Fig. 3a). A 593 nm light can only turn down the evoked GC activity partially while the 635 nm red light has no effect on UV-A-evoked GC activity, similar to the dark (Fig. 3a). After a short UV-A light pulse for 30 s, the evoked GC activity could then be switched off by 30 s 473 nm light similar with the GC activity in the dark, while the activation by UV-A can be repeated after the inhibition by blue light (Fig. 3b). Figure 3b shows that C1 is switched by UV-A and blue light between two activity states, in good accordance with results of the previous spectroscopic studies on the Cop5 rhodopsin domain [17,18,19,20]. Thus, we name the chimera C1 “switch-Cyclop1” (and C2 “switch-Cyclop2”), for bi-stable or “switchable cyclase opsin.”

[IMAGE OMITTED: SEE PDF]

The published study on the rhodopsin part of Cop5 (HKR1) revealed two light-switchable isoforms, Rh-UV (with absorption maximum at 380 nm) and Rh-Bl (with absorption maximum at 487 nm), which were suggested to be thermally stable in the darkness. Both isoforms can be efficiently interconverted by UV-A and blue light, and both states (Rh-UV and Rh-Bl) were shown to be absolutely stable for at least 50 min [17]. We determined the stability of enzyme activity in the dark after UV-A stimulation. We initially observed a gradual decrease of GC activity during incubation for several hours (Additional file 1: Figure S2A). However, it turned out that under our in vitro reaction conditions, addition of fresh ATP and GTP after 4 h completely restored the initial enzymatic activity (Additional file 1: Figure S2A). When fresh GTP and ATP were supplied every hour, the enzyme activity was constant in the dark for at least 6 h after UV-A- activation (Additional file 1: Figure S2B).

Activity of switch-Cyclop1 is switched by weak light pulses

To determine the light conditions required for activation, we first applied UV-A light ranging from 0.6 to 9.6 μW/mm2 with a 30 s duration and then measured activity in dark for 2, 10, and 18 min. As shown in Fig. 4a, activity increased with the increasing light power. 9.6 μW/mm2 is near the saturation for a 30 s illumination. With 30 s illumination half-maximal activity was obtained with ~ 2.6 μW/mm2, corresponding to a K0.5 of 78 μJ/mm2 (= 78 J/m2).

[IMAGE OMITTED: SEE PDF]

At a given light intensity, the activation should also depend on the duration, as confirmed by UV-A illumination of low intensity (0.6 μW/mm2) with different time windows (Fig. 4b). The required time for 50% activation is about 1.9 min with 0.6 μW/mm2, which results in a K0.5 of 68 μJ/mm2 (= 68 J/m2). We therefore estimate the required energy density for half-maximal activation by 380 nm photons at 73 J/m2.

We further evaluated the blue light conditions required for inhibiting the UV-A-activated switch-Cyclop1. After activation with 30 s 9.6 μW/mm2 UV-A light, 30 s illumination with blue (473 nm) light ranging from 0.6 to 9.6 μW/mm2 was applied to inhibit the enzyme. As shown in Fig. 4c, 30 s 0.5 μW/mm2 blue light inhibits ~ 50% of active switch-Cyclop1, and 30 s 9.6 μW/mm2 can inhibit more than 90% of active switch-Cyclop1. When applying lower light power and longer times, we determined that 0.6 μW/mm2 inhibits ~ 50% of active switch-Cyclop with ~ 30 s illumination (Fig. 4d). These results yield a K0.5 for blue light-induced inhibition of 15 J/m2 and of 20 J/m2, respectively. The estimated energy density for half-maximal inhibition by 473 nm photons is therefore 18 J/m2.

Similar to Cr2c-Cyclop1, functionality of switch-Cyclop1 requires Mg2+ and ATP (Additional file 1: Figure S3). Mg2+ plays distinct roles in regulating nucleotidyl cyclase activity and ATP is required for auto-phosphorylation of the conserved histidine by the kinase domain. When replacing Mg2+ with Ca2+, the enzyme activity was highly decreased, similar to the blue-inhibited state (Additional file 1: Figure S3). Ca2+ therefore cannot replace Mg2+.

Switch-Cyclop1 can sense different light ratios

Our results confirm the bi-stable regulation of the Cop5 Rhodopsin domain (HKR1) by UV-A and blue (or green) light, when fused to a domain with GC activity. However, in nature, there is always a mixture of photons of different wavelengths. We therefore tested how switch-Cyclop1 reacts to mixtures of 380 nm and 505 nm light.

We used 1 μW/mm2 continuous UV-A light for activation and different intensities of 505 nm light were added in parallel experiments. The switch-Cyclop1 activity decreases with the increasing ratio of 505 nm light (Fig. 5a). switch-Cyclop1 is an artificial chimera but it utilizes the full rhodopsin domain of Cop5 for photo sensing. This suggests that the Cop5 rhodopsin (HKR1) can sense the cyan/UV-A ratio in the living alga, if the protein Cop5 is expressed and is functional (e.g. as a heterodimer).

[IMAGE OMITTED: SEE PDF]

Cop5 and Cr2c-Cyclop1 probably co-exist in C. reinhardtii, but their rhodopsin part shows quite different characteristics: Cop5 rhodopsin is bi-stable and Cr2c-Cyclop1 rhodopsin is light-inhibited. However, we found that UV-A light (at 1 μW/mm2) cannot activate or inhibit Cr2c-Cyclop1, as its activity in UV-A is not different to the activity in dark (Fig. 5b).

Discussion

Up to seven opsin genes in the genome of C. reinhardtii were predicted already in 2004 [4, 5] and twelve were predicted in 2017 [4, 5], but only three of them have been proven functionally [6,7,8] at the molecular level and two of them were disproven as opsin proteins. The first functionally characterized authentic Chlamydomonas opsins were Cop3 and Cop4 (also named CSRA and CSRB [9]) and better known as channelrhodopsin-1 and channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR1 & ChR2) [6, 7]. The first “discovered” Chlamyopsins—Cop1 & Cop2 [8]—were recently found to be soluble proteins [8] and can be dismissed as opsins, reducing the number of possible opsins in C. reinhardtii to ten.

The light-inhibited two component-cyclase opsin, 2c-Cyclop1 [8], was the third functionally characterized Chlamydomonas opsin (Cop6). It is a big protein with a cytosolic N-terminus, an 8TM opsin domain, and a large enzymatic C-terminus, containing a His kinase (DHp and CA domain), a response regulator, and a guanylyl cyclase domain. We previously could show that Cr2c-Cyclop1 shows guanylyl cyclase activity which is strongly inhibited by green light [8]. Another opsin, Cop5, has the same conserved domain architecture as Cr2c-Cyclop1. But no cyclase activity can be observed [8], probably due to a lack of key residues in the cyclase catalytic domain. However, the opsin domain of Cop5 was heterologously expressed and extensively investigated [17,18,19,20]. It was concluded that the Cop5 rhodopsin has two stable conformations with a very long lifetime that can be switched by UV-A (380 nm) and cyan (505 nm) light.

As Cop5 mRNA is present in C. reinhardtii [4, 5], it may be speculated that it fulfills a function in the alga, perhaps as a heterodimer with a yet unknown protein. In this study, we therefore investigated if the opsin domain of Cop5 is not only changing its absorption maximum upon illumination, but is also able to transmit a light-induced signal with a measurable output. To this end, we first constructed different chimeras of Cop5 and Cr2c-Cyclop1. The chimera with the opsin domain and the His kinase domain of Cop5 and the residual C-terminus of Cr2c-Cyclop1 (Chimera 3, see Fig. 1 and Figure S1) showed only marginal guanylyl cyclase (GC) activity (Fig. 2) which was not affected significantly by blue or UV-A illumination. This might indicate that the His kinase of Cop5 is not functional or that the phosphoryl group cannot be transferred to the response regulator domain of Cr2c-Cyclop1, a known prerequisite of GC activation in Cr2c-Cyclop1. However, we gained a light-sensitive cyclase activity by fusion of the opsin domain of Cop5 with the enzymatic domains (His kinase, response regulator, guanylyl cyclase) of Cr2c-Cyclop1 (Chimeras 1 and 2, see Fig. 1 and Fig. 2).

The obtained chimeras showed light-regulated guanylyl cyclase activity with two stable states of different activity. As chimera 1 showed the highest ratio of UV-A-activated to blue-inhibited activity, we investigated this chimera further and named it switch-Cyclop1. switch-Cyclop1 can be activated by 380 nm light and inhibited by blue/green light, in good agreement to the previous spectroscopic study of its rhodopsin part [17,18,19,20], and for the first time showing a functional output of this spectroscopic change. The active state after 380 nm illumination is stable for hours. switch-Cyclop1 is very sensitive to light, either to be activated by a small amount of 380 nm photons or to be 20-fold inhibited (Fig. 4d) by blue photons. We obtained a K0.5 of ~ 150 photons /nm2 of 380 nm (~ 73 J/m2) for activation. Less blue light photons are needed for inhibition than UV-A light photons are needed for activation. We conclude a K0.5 of ~ 40 photons /nm2 of 473 nm (~ 18 J/m2) for inhibition. This suggests that the blue absorbing intermediate, or the “active state,” absorbs light more efficiently.

Conclusions

Although abundant in algal genomes, the physiological functions of 2c-Cyclop proteins are still unknown. Our study with switch-Cyclop proteins shows that the Cop5 rhodopsin can sense the UV-A/cyan ratio, which is an environmental factor influenced by daytime, weather, and water depths. However, the real light-sensing mechanism in the alga is still completely unknown. Our synthetic construct—switch-Cyclop1—is the first photosensor with enzymatic activity that can be switched on by a small amount of UV-A/violet light (380 nm photons). As it may also be switched off (to a 20-fold decreased GC activity) by application of blue or green photons, it should become a useful tool in studies on the physiological effects of cGMP. Expressing switch-Cyclop1 in the cells or tissue of interest will allow non-invasive and reversible manipulation of cGMP levels to a degree which is not possible by pharmacological intervention.

Methods

Generation of chimeras

Based on the pGEMHE-Cr2c-Cyclop1 construct from our previous experiments [8], three chimeras were generated by exchanging DNA fragments between Cop5 and Cr2c-Cyclop1 with certain restriction sites. The vector pGEMHE-Cr2c-Cyclop1 was digested with 5′-BamHI and 3′-NcoI. For chimeras 1 and 2, the Cop5 part were amplified with 5′-BamHI and 3′-PpuMI restriction sites by PCR, and the amplified fragments were digested by the two enzymes correspondingly. Meanwhile, the other missing DNA fragment from Cr2c-Cyclop1 part was PCR-amplified and digested by 5′-PpuMI and 3′-NcoI. Finally, two fragments from Cop5 and Cr2c-Cyclop1 were inserted to the BamHI/NcoI cut vector in one reaction. To clone chimera 3, the DNA fragment was amplified from Cop5, digested with BamHI/NcoI and directly ligated to the same vector.

All cloned chimeras were confirmed by complete DNA sequencing. To generate linearized DNA, plasmids were digested by NheI. cRNA was then generated after in vitro transcription by the AmpliCap-MaxT7 High Yield Message Maker Kit (Epicentre Biotechnologies).

Expression in Xenopus oocyte

Thirty or 40 ng (indicated in each figure) of cRNA was injected into Xenopus oocytes. Injected oocytes were then incubated in ND96 buffer (96 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM CaCl2,1 mM MgCl2, 5 mM HEPES, pH 7.6) supplemented with 10 μM all-trans-retinal (ATR) for 3 days at 18 °C.

Membrane extraction and in vitro GC activity assay

After 3 days of heterologous expression in Xenopus oocytes, membrane extraction and in vitro reaction procedures were performed according to [8, 12, 16]. In some cases, the reactions were started by mixing 4 μl suspended membrane extract with 36 μl guanylyl cyclase reaction buffer (100 mM NaCl, 75 mM Tris-Cl pH 7.3, 5 mM MgCl2 (or as indicated), 5 mM DTT, 0.2 mM GTP, and 0.25 mM ATP). The reactions were performed at 20 °C or otherwise indicated in the figure. Aliquots of 10 μl reaction mix were then immediately terminated by adding 190 μl sample diluent containing 0.1 M HCl from the cGMP assay kit. After proper dilution, the cGMP concentration was determined using the DetectX High Sensitivity Direct Cyclic GMP Chemiluminescent Immunoassay Kit (Arbor assays).

Illumination condition

Illuminations were mainly operated with lasers at 473 nm, 532 nm, 593 nm, and 635 nm wavelengths (Changchun New Industries Optoelectronics Tech) and LEDs of 380 nm (± 10 nm) and 505 nm (± 10 nm) (ProLight Opto Technology) as indicated. All experiments with blue light and UV-A light stimulation were applied with 473 nm laser and 380 nm (±10 nm) LED, respectively. Light intensities were measured with a Plus 2 optical power & energy meter (LaserPoint s.r.l, Italy).

Data analysis

OriginPro 2017 (OriginLab Corporation, USA) and Microsoft Excel were used for data analysis. All data are shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD), as indicated respectively. Curves were fitted by the Hill1 equation in OriginPro 2017. Activation by UV-A light of dark state, Hill1 equation for Fig. 4a and b: y = vI + (vA − vI) × x^n/(K0.5^n + x^n); inhibition by blue light of fully activated enzyme, Hill1 equation for Fig. 4c and d: y = vA + (vI − vA) × x^n/(K0.5^n + x^n). Parameter definition: y, v = normalized cGMP production, vA = v of activated enzyme, vI = v of inhibited enzyme, x = UV-A or blue light illumination intensity (μW/mm2) or time (min), K0.5 = Michaelis constant, n = cooperative sites (Hill coefficient).

Bioinformatics

Sequence alignment and file formatting were displayed by Clustal Omega 1.2.2 and Genedoc. The number of transmembrane helices in rhodopsin domains was predicted by integration of using web service TMHMM [21, 22] and JPred4 [23].

Availability of data and materials

The raw data in this study are included in the supplementary file. All the materials in this study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.

References

1. 1.

Needham DM, Yoshizawa S, Hosaka T, Poirier C, Choi CJ, Hehenberger E, Irwin NAT, Wilken S, Yung CM, Bachy C, et al. A distinct lineage of giant viruses brings a rhodopsin photosystem to unicellular marine predators. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(41):20574–83.

CAS Article Google Scholar

2. 2.

Govorunova EG, Sineshchekov OA, Li H, Spudich JL. Microbial rhodopsins: diversity, mechanisms, and optogenetic applications. Annu Rev Biochem. 2017;86:845–72.

CAS Article Google Scholar

3. 3.

Pushkarev A, Inoue K, Larom S, Flores-Uribe J, Singh M, Konno M, Tomida S, Ito S, Nakamura R, Tsunoda SP, et al. A distinct abundant group of microbial rhodopsins discovered using functional metagenomics. Nature. 2018;558(7711):595.

CAS Article Google Scholar

4. 4.

Greiner A, Kelterborn S, Evers H, Kreimer G, Sizova I, Hegemann P. Targeting of photoreceptor genes in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii via zinc-finger nucleases and CRISPR/Cas9. Plant Cell. 2017;29(10):2498–518.

CAS Article Google Scholar

5. 5.

Kateriya S, Nagel G, Bamberg E, Hegemann P. “Vision” in single-celled algae. News Physiol Sci. 2004;19:133–7.

CAS PubMed Google Scholar

6. 6.

Nagel G, Ollig D, Fuhrmann M, Kateriya S, Musti AM, Bamberg E, Hegemann P. Channelrhodopsin-1: a light-gated proton channel in green algae. Science. 2002;296(5577):2395–8.

CAS Article Google Scholar

7. 7.

Nagel G, Szellas T, Huhn W, Kateriya S, Adeishvili N, Berthold P, Ollig D, Hegemann P, Bamberg E. Channelrhodopsin-2, a directly light-gated cation-selective membrane channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(24):13940–5.

CAS Article Google Scholar

8. 8.

Tian Y, Gao S, von der Heyde EL, Hallmann A, Nagel G. Two-component cyclase opsins of green algae are ATP-dependent and light-inhibited guanylyl cyclases. BMC Biol. 2018;16(1):144.

CAS Article Google Scholar

9. 9.

Sineshchekov OA, Jung KH, Spudich JL. Two rhodopsins mediate phototaxis to low- and high-intensity light in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(13):8689–94.

CAS Article Google Scholar

10. 10.

Deininger W, Kroger P, Hegemann U, Lottspeich F, Hegemann P. Chlamyrhodopsin represents a new type of sensory photoreceptor. EMBO J. 1995;14(23):5849–58.

CAS Article Google Scholar

11. 11.

von der Heyde EL, Hallmann A. Babo1, formerly Vop1 and Cop1/2, is no eyespot photoreceptor but a basal body protein illuminating cell division in Volvox carteri. Plant J. 2020;102(2):276–98.

Article Google Scholar

12. 12.

Gao S, Nagpal J, Schneider MW, Kozjak-Pavlovic V, Nagel G, Gottschalk A. Optogenetic manipulation of cGMP in cells and animals by the tightly light-regulated guanylyl-cyclase opsin CyclOp. Nat Commun. 2015;6:8046.

Article Google Scholar

13. 13.

Scheib U, Stehfest K, Gee CE, Korschen HG, Fudim R, Oertner TG, Hegemann P. The rhodopsin-guanylyl cyclase of the aquatic fungus Blastocladiella emersonii enables fast optical control of cGMP signaling. Sci Signal. 2015;8(389):rs8.

Article Google Scholar

14. 14.

Kumar RP, Morehouse BR, Fofana J, Trieu MM, Zhou DH, Lorenz MO, Oprian DD. Structure and monomer/dimer equilibrium for the guanylyl cyclase domain of the optogenetics protein RhoGC. J Biol Chem. 2017;292(52):21578–89.

CAS Article Google Scholar

15. 15.

Trieu MM, Devine EL, Lamarche LB, Ammerman AE, Greco JA, Birge RR, Theobald DL, Oprian DD. Expression, purification, and spectral tuning of RhoGC, a retinylidene/guanylyl cyclase fusion protein and optogenetics tool from the aquatic fungus Blastocladiella emersonii. J Biol Chem. 2017;292(25):10379–89.

CAS Article Google Scholar

16. 16.

Tian Y, Gao S, Yang S, Nagel G. A novel rhodopsin phosphodiesterase from Salpingoeca rosetta shows light-enhanced substrate affinity. Biochem J. 2018;475(6):1121–8.

CAS Article Google Scholar

17. 17.

Luck M, Mathes T, Bruun S, Fudim R, Hagedorn R, Tran Nguyen TM, Kateriya S, Kennis JT, Hildebrandt P, Hegemann P. A photochromic histidine kinase rhodopsin (HKR1) that is bimodally switched by ultraviolet and blue light. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(47):40083–90.

CAS Article Google Scholar

18. 18.

Penzkofer A, Luck M, Mathes T, Hegemann P. Bistable retinal schiff base photodynamics of histidine kinase rhodopsin HKR1 from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Photochem Photobiol. 2014;90(4):773–85.

CAS PubMed Google Scholar

19. 19.

Luck M, Bruun S, Keidel A, Hegemann P, Hildebrandt P. Photochemical chromophore isomerization in histidine kinase rhodopsin HKR1. FEBS Lett. 2015;589(10):1067–71.

CAS Article Google Scholar

20. 20.

Luck M, Hegemann P. The two parallel photocycles of the Chlamydomonas sensory photoreceptor histidine kinase rhodopsin 1. J Plant Physiol. 2017;217:77–84.

CAS Article Google Scholar

21. 21.

Moller S, Croning MD, Apweiler R. Evaluation of methods for the prediction of membrane spanning regions. Bioinformatics. 2001;17(7):646–53.

CAS Article Google Scholar

22. 22.

Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer EL. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol. 2001;305(3):567–80.

CAS Article Google Scholar

23. 23.

Drozdetskiy A, Cole C, Procter J, Barton GJ. JPred4: a protein secondary structure prediction server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(W1):W389–94.

CAS Article Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all members of the laboratory for mutual help in routine lab work and for discussion.

Funding

This work is funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) Projektnummer 374031971 TRR 240 A04 and DFG Projektnummer 417451587, as well as supported by the Prix-Louis-Jeantet foundation to GN. This publication was supported by the Open Access Publication Fund of the University of Wuerzburg. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Affiliations

1.

Department of Neurophysiology, Institute of Physiology, Biocenter, University of Wuerzburg, 97070, Wuerzburg, Germany

Yuehui Tian, Georg Nagel & Shiqiang Gao

2.

Present address: Environmental Microbiomics Research Center, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, China

Yuehui Tian

Authors

1. Yuehui Tian

View author publications

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

2. Georg Nagel

View author publications

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

3. Shiqiang Gao

View author publications

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S.G., Y.T., and G.N. designed the experiments. Y.T. performed the experiments. Y.T., G.N., and S.G. analyzed the data. S.G. and Y.T. wrote the first draft of the paper, and all authors revised the paper and approved the final version to be published.

Authors’ information

Department of Neurophysiology, Institute of Physiology, Biocenter, University of Wuerzburg, 97070 Wuerzburg, Germany

Yuehui Tian, Georg Nagel, Shiqiang Gao (Twitter: @Gao_SQ)

Yuehui Tian’s present address is Environmental Microbiomics Research Center, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Georg Nagel or Shiqiang Gao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All experiments were performed by heterologous proteins expression in Xenopus laevis oocytes and in vitro tests. Xenopus laevis oocytes were obtained from Julius-von-Sachs-Institute for Biosciences, University of Wuerzburg. The frog operation there was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Basel Declaration and recommendations of Landratsamt Wuerzburg, Veterinaeramt. The protocol under License #70/14 from Landratsamt Wuerzburg, Veterinaeramt, was approved by the responsible veterinarian.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Sequence alignment of Cop5 and Cr2c-Cyclop1. Figure S2. Stability of UV-A-activated switch-Cyclop1. Figure S3. Activities of switch-Cyclop1 under different reaction conditions.

Additional file 2.

Raw data values.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tian, Y., Nagel, G. & Gao, S. An engineered membrane-bound guanylyl cyclase with light-switchable activity. BMC Biol 19, 54 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-021-00978-6

Download citation

*

Received: 09 November 2020

*

Accepted: 09 February 2021

*

Published: 29 March 2021

*

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-021-00978-6

Keywords

* Chlamydomonas reinhardtii

* Guanylyl cyclase

* Optogenetics

* Rhodopsin

* Cyclic GMP

References

1. Needham DM, Yoshizawa S, Hosaka T, Poirier C, Choi CJ, Hehenberger E, Irwin NAT, Wilken S, Yung CM, Bachy C, et al. A distinct lineage of giant viruses brings a rhodopsin photosystem to unicellular marine predators. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(41):20574–83. CAS Article Google Scholar

2. Govorunova EG, Sineshchekov OA, Li H, Spudich JL. Microbial rhodopsins: diversity, mechanisms, and optogenetic applications. Annu Rev Biochem. 2017;86:845–72. CAS Article Google Scholar

3. Pushkarev A, Inoue K, Larom S, Flores-Uribe J, Singh M, Konno M, Tomida S, Ito S, Nakamura R, Tsunoda SP, et al. A distinct abundant group of microbial rhodopsins discovered using functional metagenomics. Nature. 2018;558(7711):595. CAS Article Google Scholar

4. Greiner A, Kelterborn S, Evers H, Kreimer G, Sizova I, Hegemann P. Targeting of photoreceptor genes in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii via zinc-finger nucleases and CRISPR/Cas9. Plant Cell. 2017;29(10):2498–518. CAS Article Google Scholar

5. Kateriya S, Nagel G, Bamberg E, Hegemann P. “Vision” in single-celled algae. News Physiol Sci. 2004;19:133–7. CAS PubMed Google Scholar

6. Nagel G, Ollig D, Fuhrmann M, Kateriya S, Musti AM, Bamberg E, Hegemann P. Channelrhodopsin-1: a light-gated proton channel in green algae. Science. 2002;296(5577):2395–8. CAS Article Google Scholar

7. Nagel G, Szellas T, Huhn W, Kateriya S, Adeishvili N, Berthold P, Ollig D, Hegemann P, Bamberg E. Channelrhodopsin-2, a directly light-gated cation-selective membrane channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(24):13940–5. CAS Article Google Scholar

8. Tian Y, Gao S, von der Heyde EL, Hallmann A, Nagel G. Two-component cyclase opsins of green algae are ATP-dependent and light-inhibited guanylyl cyclases. BMC Biol. 2018;16(1):144. CAS Article Google Scholar

9. Sineshchekov OA, Jung KH, Spudich JL. Two rhodopsins mediate phototaxis to low- and high-intensity light in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(13):8689–94. CAS Article Google Scholar

10. Deininger W, Kroger P, Hegemann U, Lottspeich F, Hegemann P. Chlamyrhodopsin represents a new type of sensory photoreceptor. EMBO J. 1995;14(23):5849–58. CAS Article Google Scholar

11. von der Heyde EL, Hallmann A. Babo1, formerly Vop1 and Cop1/2, is no eyespot photoreceptor but a basal body protein illuminating cell division in Volvox carteri. Plant J. 2020;102(2):276–98. Article Google Scholar

12. Gao S, Nagpal J, Schneider MW, Kozjak-Pavlovic V, Nagel G, Gottschalk A. Optogenetic manipulation of cGMP in cells and animals by the tightly light-regulated guanylyl-cyclase opsin CyclOp. Nat Commun. 2015;6:8046. Article Google Scholar

13. Scheib U, Stehfest K, Gee CE, Korschen HG, Fudim R, Oertner TG, Hegemann P. The rhodopsin-guanylyl cyclase of the aquatic fungus Blastocladiella emersonii enables fast optical control of cGMP signaling. Sci Signal. 2015;8(389):rs8. Article Google Scholar

14. Kumar RP, Morehouse BR, Fofana J, Trieu MM, Zhou DH, Lorenz MO, Oprian DD. Structure and monomer/dimer equilibrium for the guanylyl cyclase domain of the optogenetics protein RhoGC. J Biol Chem. 2017;292(52):21578–89. CAS Article Google Scholar

15. Trieu MM, Devine EL, Lamarche LB, Ammerman AE, Greco JA, Birge RR, Theobald DL, Oprian DD. Expression, purification, and spectral tuning of RhoGC, a retinylidene/guanylyl cyclase fusion protein and optogenetics tool from the aquatic fungus Blastocladiella emersonii. J Biol Chem. 2017;292(25):10379–89. CAS Article Google Scholar

16. Tian Y, Gao S, Yang S, Nagel G. A novel rhodopsin phosphodiesterase from Salpingoeca rosetta shows light-enhanced substrate affinity. Biochem J. 2018;475(6):1121–8. CAS Article Google Scholar

17. Luck M, Mathes T, Bruun S, Fudim R, Hagedorn R, Tran Nguyen TM, Kateriya S, Kennis JT, Hildebrandt P, Hegemann P. A photochromic histidine kinase rhodopsin (HKR1) that is bimodally switched by ultraviolet and blue light. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(47):40083–90. CAS Article Google Scholar

18. Penzkofer A, Luck M, Mathes T, Hegemann P. Bistable retinal schiff base photodynamics of histidine kinase rhodopsin HKR1 from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Photochem Photobiol. 2014;90(4):773–85. CAS PubMed Google Scholar

19. Luck M, Bruun S, Keidel A, Hegemann P, Hildebrandt P. Photochemical chromophore isomerization in histidine kinase rhodopsin HKR1. FEBS Lett. 2015;589(10):1067–71. CAS Article Google Scholar

20. Luck M, Hegemann P. The two parallel photocycles of the Chlamydomonas sensory photoreceptor histidine kinase rhodopsin 1. J Plant Physiol. 2017;217:77–84. CAS Article Google Scholar

21. Moller S, Croning MD, Apweiler R. Evaluation of methods for the prediction of membrane spanning regions. Bioinformatics. 2001;17(7):646–53. CAS Article Google Scholar

22. Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer EL. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol. 2001;305(3):567–80. CAS Article Google Scholar

23. Drozdetskiy A, Cole C, Procter J, Barton GJ. JPred4: a protein secondary structure prediction server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(W1):W389–94. CAS Article Google Scholar