It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
To design incentives towards achieving climate mitigation targets, it is important to understand the mechanisms that affect individual climate decisions such as solar panel installation. It has been shown that peer effects are important in determining the uptake and spread of household photovoltaic installations. Due to coarse geographical data, it remains unclear whether this effect is generated through geographical proximity or within groups exhibiting similar characteristics. Here we show that geographical proximity is the most important predictor of solar panel implementation, and that peer effects diminish with distance. Using satellite imagery, we build a unique geo-located dataset for the city of Fresno to specify the importance of small distances. Employing machine learning techniques, we find the density of solar panels within the shortest measured radius of an address is the most important factor in determining the likelihood of that address having a solar panel. The importance of geographical proximity decreases with distance following an exponential curve with a decay radius of 210 meters. The dependence is slightly more pronounced in low-income groups. These findings support the model of distance-related social diffusion, and suggest priority should be given to seeding panels in areas where few exist.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, Germany (GRID:grid.4556.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 0493 9031)
2 Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, Germany (GRID:grid.4556.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 0493 9031); Mercator Research Institute On Global Commons and Climate Change, Berlin, Germany (GRID:grid.506488.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0582 7760); University of California, Department of Agriculture and Resource Economics, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.47840.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 7878)
3 Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, Germany (GRID:grid.4556.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 0493 9031); Potsdam University, Institute of Physics, Potsdam, Germany (GRID:grid.11348.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 0942 1117); Columbia University, New York, USA (GRID:grid.21729.3f) (ISNI:0000000419368729)