It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
In dromedary camels, which are pseudo-ruminants, rumen or C1 section of stomach is the main compartment involved in fiber degradation, as in true ruminants. However, as camels are adapted to the harsh and scarce grazing conditions of desert, their ruminal microbiota makes an interesting target of study. The present study was undertaken to generate the rumen microbial profile of Indian camel using 16S rRNA amplicon and shotgun metagenomics. The camels were fed three diets differing in the source of roughage. The comparative metagenomic analysis revealed greater proportions of significant differences between two fractions of rumen content followed by diet associated differences. Significant differences were also observed in the rumen microbiota collected at different time-points of the feeding trial. However, fraction related differences were more highlighted as compared to diet dependent changes in microbial profile from shotgun metagenomics data. Further, 16 genera were identified as part of the core rumen microbiome of Indian camels. Moreover, glycoside hydrolases were observed to be the most abundant among all Carbohydrate-Active enzymes and were dominated by GH2, GH3, GH13 and GH43. In all, this study describes the camel rumen microbiota under different dietary conditions with focus on taxonomic, functional, and Carbohydrate-Active enzymes profiles.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Anand Agricultural University, Department of Animal Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Science & A.H., Anand, India (GRID:grid.411373.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1794 2950)
2 ICAR-National Research Centre On Camel, Bikaner, India (GRID:grid.465023.6)
3 ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur, India (GRID:grid.464742.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0504 6921)
4 ICAR-National Research Centre On Camel, Bikaner, India (GRID:grid.465023.6); ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur, India (GRID:grid.464742.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0504 6921)
5 CSIR-National Environmental Engineering Research Institute, Environmental Biotechnology and Genomics Division, Nagpur, India (GRID:grid.419340.b) (ISNI:0000 0000 8848 8397)
6 Anand Agricultural University, Department of Animal Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Science & A.H., Anand, India (GRID:grid.411373.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1794 2950); Gujarat Biotechnology Research Centre, Gandhinagar, India (GRID:grid.411373.3)