It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Reverse transcription of the HIV-1 viral RNA genome (vRNA) is an integral step in virus replication. Upon viral entry, HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) initiates from a host tRNALys3 primer bound to the vRNA genome and is the target of key antivirals, such as non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs). Initiation proceeds slowly with discrete pausing events along the vRNA template. Despite prior medium-resolution structural characterization of reverse transcriptase initiation complexes (RTICs), higher-resolution structures of the RTIC are needed to understand the molecular mechanisms that underlie initiation. Here we report cryo-EM structures of the core RTIC, RTIC–nevirapine, and RTIC–efavirenz complexes at 2.8, 3.1, and 2.9 Å, respectively. In combination with biochemical studies, these data suggest a basis for rapid dissociation kinetics of RT from the vRNA–tRNALys3 initiation complex and reveal a specific structural mechanism of nucleic acid conformational stabilization during initiation. Finally, our results show that NNRTIs inhibit the RTIC and exacerbate discrete pausing during early reverse transcription.
Initiation of HIV-1 reverse transcription occurs at the host tRNALys3, which forms a complex with the 5’ end of the HIV-1 viral RNA and reverse transcriptase (RT). Here, the authors present the 2.8 Å cryo-EM structure of a minimal HIV-1 RT–vRNA–tRNALys3 initiation complex (miniRTIC), and miniRTIC structures with the bound non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors nevirapine and efavirenz at 3.1 and 2.9 Å resolution, respectively.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Structural Biology, Stanford, USA (GRID:grid.168010.e) (ISNI:0000000419368956); Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford, USA (GRID:grid.168010.e) (ISNI:0000000419368956)
2 Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Structural Biology, Stanford, USA (GRID:grid.168010.e) (ISNI:0000000419368956); Stanford University, Program in Biophysics, Stanford, USA (GRID:grid.168010.e) (ISNI:0000000419368956); Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.47840.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 7878)
3 Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Structural Biology, Stanford, USA (GRID:grid.168010.e) (ISNI:0000000419368956)
4 Columbia University, Department of Chemistry and Molecular Biophysics, New York, USA (GRID:grid.21729.3f) (ISNI:0000000419368729); The Rockefeller University, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Laboratory of Molecular Neurobiology and Biophysics, New York, USA (GRID:grid.134907.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2166 1519)