It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Soil sustainability is reflected in a long-term balance between soil production and erosion for a given climate and geology. Here we evaluate soil sustainability in the Andean Altiplano where accelerated erosion has been linked to wetter climate from 4.5 ka and the rise of Neolithic agropastoralism in the millennium that followed. We measure in situ cosmogenic 14C directly on cultivated hilltops to quantify late Holocene soil loss, which we compare with background soil production rates determined from cosmogenic 26Al and 10Be. Our Monte Carlo-based inversion method identifies two scenarios to account for our data: an increase in erosion rate by 1–2 orders of magnitude between ~2.6 and 1.1 ka, or a discrete event stripping ~1–2 m of soil between ~1.9 and 1.1 ka. Coupled environmental and cultural factors in the Late Holocene signaled the onset of the pervasive human imprint in the Andean Altiplano seen today.
The assessment of soil sustainability in prehistoric times requires comparing millennium-scale erosion rates with geological background rates. Here, the authors apply in situ cosmogenic 14C, 10Be, and 26Al to reveal rapid soil erosion on the Andean Altiplano in response to Late Holocene climate change and the onset of agropastoralism.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details






1 ETH Zürich, Laboratory of Ion Beam Physics, Zürich, Switzerland (GRID:grid.5801.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2156 2780); Institute of Geological Sciences, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany (GRID:grid.14095.39) (ISNI:0000 0000 9116 4836)
2 GFÚ Institute of Geophysics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czechia (GRID:grid.418095.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 1015 3316)
3 Aarhus University, Department of Geoscience, Aarhus, Denmark (GRID:grid.7048.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 1956 2722)
4 Geological Institute, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland (GRID:grid.5801.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2156 2780)
5 ETH Zürich, Laboratory of Ion Beam Physics, Zürich, Switzerland (GRID:grid.5801.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2156 2780)
6 National Cooperative for the Disposal of Radioactive Waste (NAGRA), Wettingen, Switzerland (GRID:grid.425451.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 0449 1417)
7 University of Potsdam, Institute of Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany (GRID:grid.11348.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 0942 1117)
8 Pennsylvania State University, Department of Anthropology, State College, USA (GRID:grid.29857.31) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 4281)
9 Institute of Geochemistry and Petrology, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland (GRID:grid.5801.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2156 2780)