Full text

Turn on search term navigation

© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.

Abstract

Simple Summary

Milk productivity of Vietnamese smallholder dairy cows is reported to be relatively low. Thorough analysis of lactating cow diets and feeding regimes in those smallholder dairy farms could help define the limitations of diets and feeding regimes relative to milk production. This study analysed and compared the feeding regimes and nutrient balance for lactating cows among four typical dairy regions including both highlands and lowlands located in both the north and south of Vietnam and evaluated the possibility of systematic dietary imbalance. The results show that the diets in all regions were excessive in protein, fibre and most mineral concentrations but insufficient in energy and non-fibre carbohydrates. The most used roughages including Napier grass, corn silage, fresh corn with cob, and rice straw were all relatively high in fibre concentrations. Feed efficiency of the diets across regions were sub-optimal. Thus, increasing dietary net energy concentration by increasing the use of starch and fat and decreasing the fibre concentration of the diet by decreasing the use of Napier grass or rice straw to balance the diets might help improve the milk production and thereby increase feed efficiency.

Abstract

A limited literature suggests relatively simple feeding regimes and diet formulation strategies for dairy cows in Vietnamese smallholder dairy farms (SDFs). This study aimed to classify and compare feeding regimes and nutrient balance for lactating cows between four typical dairy regions (south lowland, south highland, north lowland, and north highland) in Vietnam and evaluate the possibility of systematic dietary imbalance. Eight SDFs from each of the four regions were visited for two adjacent milking periods per farm. For each visit, frequency and methods of feed and water supply to the lactating cows were recorded, and individual fat corrected milk yield (ECM) of lactating cows were calculated from milk yield and fat concentration. The amount of each diet ingredient offered and refused by each lactating group was weighed and sampled for calculation of dry matter intake per cow (DMI) and analysis of nutrient composition in the component offered. PCDairy, a diet formulation computer model, was used to calculate actual and recommended dietary nutrient concentrations and predict potential milk production. Factor analysis, cluster analysis, and ANOVA were applied to determine grouping effects across as well as between regions. Feeding regimes and diets were grouped into three and nine clusters, respectively. Farmers in the same region tended to apply similar diets and feeding regimes. Across regions, only 47% of all SDFs supplied water ad libitum to the cows. The most used roughages including Napier grass, corn silage, fresh corn with cob, and rice straw were all relatively high in neutral detergent fibre (NDF), acid detergent fibre (ADF), and acid detergent lignin (ADL). The diets in all regions were excessive in crude protein, NDF, ADF, ADL, and most minerals (Ca, P, Mg, K, Na, S, Fe, Zn, Cu, and Mn) but insufficient in net energy and non-fibre carbohydrate. Feed efficiency (1.06 kg FCM/kg DMI) of the diets were sub-optimal. Feeding regimes and dietary nutrient balance of the south lowland SDFs were most problematic. Increasing dietary net energy concentration by increasing the use of starch and fat and decreasing dietary fibre concentration by decreasing the use of Napier grass or rice straw to balance the diets might help improve the milk production and thereby increase feed efficiency.

Details

Title
Issues of Feeding Strategy for Lactating Cows in Vietnamese Smallholder Dairy Farms
Author
Bang, Nguyen N 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Chanh, Nguyen V 2   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Trach, Nguyen X 3 ; Khang, Duong N 2 ; Hayes, Ben J 4 ; Gaughan, John B 5   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Lyons, Russell E 6 ; Hai, Nguyen T 2   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; McNeill, David M 6 

 School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia; [email protected]; Faculty of Animal Science, Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Hanoi 131000, Vietnam; [email protected] 
 Faculty of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Nong Lam University, Ho Chi Minh 71308, Vietnam; [email protected] (N.V.C.); [email protected] (D.N.K.); [email protected] (N.T.H.) 
 Faculty of Animal Science, Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Hanoi 131000, Vietnam; [email protected] 
 Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4067, Australia; [email protected] 
 School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia; [email protected] 
 School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia; [email protected] 
First page
729
Publication year
2021
Publication date
2021
Publisher
MDPI AG
e-ISSN
20762615
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2522843483
Copyright
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.