It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
In the current global emergency due to SARS-CoV-2 outbreak, passive immunotherapy emerges as a promising treatment for COVID-19. Among animal-derived products, equine formulations are still the cornerstone therapy for treating envenomations due to animal bites and stings. Therefore, drawing upon decades of experience in manufacturing snake antivenom, we developed and preclinically evaluated two anti-SARS-CoV-2 polyclonal equine formulations as potential alternative therapy for COVID-19. We immunized two groups of horses with either S1 (anti-S1) or a mixture of S1, N, and SEM mosaic (anti-Mix) viral recombinant proteins. Horses reached a maximum anti-viral antibody level at 7 weeks following priming, and showed no major adverse acute or chronic clinical alterations. Two whole-IgG formulations were prepared via hyperimmune plasma precipitation with caprylic acid and then formulated for parenteral use. Both preparations had similar physicochemical and microbiological quality and showed ELISA immunoreactivity towards S1 protein and the receptor binding domain (RBD). The anti-Mix formulation also presented immunoreactivity against N protein. Due to high anti-S1 and anti-RBD antibody content, final products exhibited high in vitro neutralizing capacity of SARS-CoV-2 infection, 80 times higher than a pool of human convalescent plasma. Pre-clinical quality profiles were similar among both products, but clinical efficacy and safety must be tested in clinical trials. The technological strategy we describe here can be adapted by other producers, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Universidad de Costa Rica, Facultad de Microbiología, Instituto Clodomiro Picado, San José, Costa Rica (GRID:grid.412889.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0706)
2 Universidad de Costa Rica, Virology-CIET (Research Center for Tropical Diseases), Facultad de Microbiología, San José, Costa Rica (GRID:grid.412889.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0706)
3 George Mason University, National Center for Biodefense and Infectious Diseases, Virginia, USA (GRID:grid.22448.38) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8032)
4 Universidad de Costa Rica, Facultad de Microbiología, Instituto Clodomiro Picado, San José, Costa Rica (GRID:grid.412889.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0706); Universidad de Costa Rica, Departamento de Bioquímica, Escuela de Medicina, San José, Costa Rica (GRID:grid.412889.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0706)