It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) is considered as one of the 100 most harmful IAS in the world. Traditional detection methods have limitations, and PCR based environmental DNA detection has provided interesting results for early warning. However, in the last years, the development of isothermal amplification methods has received increasing attention. Among them, loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) has several advantages, including its higher tolerance to the presence of inhibitors and the possibility of naked-eye detection, which enables and simplifies its potential use in decentralized settings. In the current study, a real-time LAMP (qLAMP) method for the detection of Dreissena polymorpha was developed and tested with samples from the Guadalquivir River basin, together with two real-time PCR (qPCR) methods using different detection chemistries, targeting a specific region of the mitochondrial gene cytochrome C oxidase subunit I. All three developed approaches were evaluated regarding specificity, sensitivity and time required for detection. Regarding sensitivity, both qPCR approaches were more sensitive than qLAMP by one order of magnitude, however the qLAMP method proved to be as specific and much faster being performed in just 9 min versus 23 and 29 min for the qPCR methods based on hydrolysis probe and intercalating dye respectively.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 International Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory (INL), Food Quality and Safety Research Group, Braga, Portugal (GRID:grid.420330.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 0521 6935); University of Santiago de Compostela, Department of Analytical Chemistry, Nutrition and Food Science, School of Veterinary Sciences, Santiago de Compostela, Spain (GRID:grid.11794.3a) (ISNI:0000000109410645)
2 International Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory (INL), Food Quality and Safety Research Group, Braga, Portugal (GRID:grid.420330.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 0521 6935)
3 University of Santiago de Compostela, Department of Analytical Chemistry, Nutrition and Food Science, School of Veterinary Sciences, Santiago de Compostela, Spain (GRID:grid.11794.3a) (ISNI:0000000109410645)
4 University of Cordoba, Department of Zoology, Córdoba, Spain (GRID:grid.411901.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2183 9102); Guadalictio S.L., Córdoba, Spain (GRID:grid.411901.c)
5 Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica y el Reto Demográfico, Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadalquivir, Sevilla, Spain (GRID:grid.411901.c)




