It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
As demonstrated at Anak Krakatau on December 22nd, 2018, tsunamis generated by volcanic flank collapse are incompletely understood and can be devastating. Here, we present the first high-resolution characterisation of both subaerial and submarine components of the collapse. Combined Synthetic Aperture Radar data and aerial photographs reveal an extensive subaerial failure that bounds pre-event deformation and volcanic products. To the southwest of the volcano, bathymetric and seismic reflection data reveal a blocky landslide deposit (0.214 ± 0.036 km3) emplaced over 1.5 km into the adjacent basin. Our findings are consistent with en-masse lateral collapse with a volume ≥0.175 km3, resolving several ambiguities in previous reconstructions. Post-collapse eruptions produced an additional ~0.3 km3 of tephra, burying the scar and landslide deposit. The event provides a model for lateral collapse scenarios at other arc-volcanic islands showing that rapid island growth can lead to large-scale failure and that even faster rebuilding can obscure pre-existing collapse.
The authors here present a detailed reconstruction of the landslide mass following the 2018 eruption of Anak Krakatau. Bathymetry data reports the volume of the collapsed submarine flank to be much larger than previously reported.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details








1 National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, UK (GRID:grid.418022.d) (ISNI:0000 0004 0603 464X)
2 British Geological Survey (BGS), Nottingham, UK (GRID:grid.474329.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 1956 5915); University College London (UCL), London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000000121901201)
3 University of Birmingham, School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Birmingham, UK (GRID:grid.6572.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7486)
4 Marine Geological Institute, Bandung, Indonesia (GRID:grid.6572.6)
5 British Geological Survey (BGS), Nottingham, UK (GRID:grid.474329.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 1956 5915)
6 University of Leeds, School of Earth and Environment, Leeds, UK (GRID:grid.9909.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8403)
7 University of Oxford, Department of Earth Sciences, Oxford, UK (GRID:grid.4991.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8948)
8 University of Rhode Island (URI), Department of Ocean Engineering, Narragansett, USA (GRID:grid.20431.34) (ISNI:0000 0004 0416 2242)
9 Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI), Research Center for Geotechnology, Bandung, Indonesia (GRID:grid.249566.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0644 6054)
10 Institut Teknologi Bandung, Department of Geological Engineering, Bandung, Indonesia (GRID:grid.434933.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 1808 0563)
11 Badan Pengkajian dan Penerapan Teknologi, PTRRB-TPSA, DKI Jakarta, Java, Jakarta, Indonesia (GRID:grid.432292.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 0746 0534)