It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Urbanisation is increasing worldwide, and there is now ample evidence of phenotypic changes in wild organisms in response to this novel environment. Yet, the genetic changes and genomic architecture underlying these adaptations are poorly understood. Here, we genotype 192 great tits (Parus major) from nine European cities, each paired with an adjacent rural site, to address this major knowledge gap in our understanding of wildlife urban adaptation. We find that a combination of polygenic allele frequency shifts and recurrent selective sweeps are associated with the adaptation of great tits to urban environments. While haplotypes under selection are rarely shared across urban populations, selective sweeps occur within the same genes, mostly linked to neural function and development. Collectively, we show that urban adaptation in a widespread songbird occurs through unique and shared selective sweeps in a core-set of behaviour-linked genes.
The genetic architecture underlying rapid adaptive responses to novel environments are poorly understood. A study of great tits from nine European cities finds that urban adaptation in a widespread songbird occurred through unique and shared selective sweeps in a core-set of behaviour-linked genes.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details









1 Lund University, Department of Biology, Lund, Sweden (GRID:grid.4514.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 0930 2361); University of Glasgow, Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, Glasgow, UK (GRID:grid.8756.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2193 314X)
2 University of Glasgow, Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, Glasgow, UK (GRID:grid.8756.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2193 314X)
3 Lund University, Department of Biology, Lund, Sweden (GRID:grid.4514.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 0930 2361)
4 Sorbonne Université, UPEC, Paris 7, CNRS, INRA, IRD, Institut d’Écologie et des Sciences de l’Environnement de Paris, iEES Paris, Paris, France (GRID:grid.462350.6)
5 Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Department of Biology, Munich, Germany (GRID:grid.5252.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 973X)
6 University of Glasgow, Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, Glasgow, UK (GRID:grid.8756.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2193 314X); GELIFES - Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.4830.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 0407 1981)
7 Museu de Ciències Naturals de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain (GRID:grid.507605.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 1958 5537)
8 Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), Department of Animal Ecology, Wageningen, Netherlands (GRID:grid.418375.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 1013 0288)