It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Deep learning and computer vision algorithms can deliver highly accurate and automated interpretation of medical imaging to augment and assist clinicians. However, medical imaging presents uniquely pertinent obstacles such as a lack of accessible data or a high-cost of annotation. To address this, we developed data-efficient deep learning classifiers for prediction tasks in cardiology. Using pipeline supervised models to focus relevant structures, we achieve an accuracy of 94.4% for 15-view still-image echocardiographic view classification and 91.2% accuracy for binary left ventricular hypertrophy classification. We then develop semi-supervised generative adversarial network models that can learn from both labeled and unlabeled data in a generalizable fashion. We achieve greater than 80% accuracy in view classification with only 4% of labeled data used in solely supervised techniques and achieve 92.3% accuracy for left ventricular hypertrophy classification. In exploring trade-offs between model type, resolution, data resources, and performance, we present a comprehensive analysis and improvements of efficient deep learning solutions for medical imaging assessment especially in cardiology.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 University of California, Molecular Cell Biomechanics Laboratory, Departments of Bioengineering and Mechanical Engineering, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.47840.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 7878)
2 University of California, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.47840.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 7878)
3 University of California, Molecular Cell Biomechanics Laboratory, Departments of Bioengineering and Mechanical Engineering, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.47840.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 7878); UCSF-Berkeley Graduate Program in Bioengineering, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.266102.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 2297 6811)