Full text

Turn on search term navigation

© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.

Abstract

Nitrite and nitrate are added to cured meat for their bacteriological, technological and sensorial properties. However, they are suspected to be involved in the formation of nitroso compounds (NOCs), such as potentially mutagenic nitrosamines, nitrosylheme and nitrosothiols. Controlling the sanitary and sensorial qualities of cured meat products by reducing these additives requires elucidating the mechanisms involved in the formation of NOCs. To this end, we studied the dose-response relationship of added sodium nitrite and/or sodium nitrate (0/0, 80/80, 0/200, and 120/120 ppm) on the formation of NOCs in dry cured fermented sausages. The results showed a basal heme iron nitrosylation in the absence of NaNO2/NaNO3 due to starter cultures. This reaction was promoted by the addition of NaNO2/NaNO3 in the other conditions. Reducing the dose to 80/80 ppm still limits lipid oxidation without the formation of non-volatile nitrosamines. Conversely, the addition of NO2/NO3 slightly increases protein oxidation through higher carbonyl content. The use of 80/80 ppm could be a means of reducing these additives in dry-cured fermented meat products.

Details

Title
New Insights into the Chemical Reactivity of Dry-Cured Fermented Sausages: Focus on Nitrosation, Nitrosylation and Oxidation
Author
Bonifacie, Aline 1 ; Gatellier, Philippe 2 ; Promeyrat, Aurélie 3 ; Nassy, Gilles 3 ; Picgirard, Laurent 4 ; Scislowski, Valérie 4 ; Santé-Lhoutellier, Véronique 2   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Théron, Laetitia 2 

 Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), UR370 Qualité des Produits Animaux, F-63122 Saint Genès-Champanelle, France; [email protected] (A.B.); [email protected] (P.G.); [email protected] (V.S.-L.); IFIP—Institut du Porc, 7 Avenue du Général De Gaulle, F-94700 Maisons Alfort, France 
 Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), UR370 Qualité des Produits Animaux, F-63122 Saint Genès-Champanelle, France; [email protected] (A.B.); [email protected] (P.G.); [email protected] (V.S.-L.) 
 IFIP—Institut du Porc, La Motte au Vicomte, BP 35104, F-35561 Le Rheu CEDEX, France; [email protected] (A.P.); [email protected] (G.N.) 
 Association Pour le Développement de l’Industrie de la Viande (ADIV), 10, Rue Jacqueline Auriol, F-63039 Clermont-Ferrand, France; [email protected] (L.P.); [email protected] (V.S.) 
First page
852
Publication year
2021
Publication date
2021
Publisher
MDPI AG
e-ISSN
23048158
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2531386130
Copyright
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.