It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Vibrational energy transfer (VET) is essential for protein function. It is responsible for efficient energy dissipation in reaction sites, and has been linked to pathways of allosteric communication. While it is understood that VET occurs via backbone as well as via non-covalent contacts, little is known about the competition of these two transport channels, which determines the VET pathways. To tackle this problem, we equipped the β-hairpin fold of a tryptophan zipper with pairs of non-canonical amino acids, one serving as a VET injector and one as a VET sensor in a femtosecond pump probe experiment. Accompanying extensive non-equilibrium molecular dynamics simulations combined with a master equation analysis unravel the VET pathways. Our joint experimental/computational endeavor reveals the efficiency of backbone vs. contact transport, showing that even if cutting short backbone stretches of only 3 to 4 amino acids in a protein, hydrogen bonds are the dominant VET pathway.
Vibrational energy transfer (VET) is essential for protein function as it is responsible for efficient energy dissipation in reaction sites and is linked to pathways of allosteric communication. Here authors equipped a tryptophan zipper with a VET injector and a VET sensor for femtosecond pump probe experiments to map the VET.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details







1 Goethe University Frankfurt, Institute of Biophysics, Frankfurt/Main, Germany (GRID:grid.7839.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9721)
2 Albert Ludwigs University, Biomolecular Dynamics, Institute of Physics, Freiburg, Germany (GRID:grid.5963.9)
3 Technical University Berlin, Institute of Chemistry, Berlin, Germany (GRID:grid.6734.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2292 8254); GenoSynth GmbH, Berlin, Germany (GRID:grid.6734.6)
4 Technical University Berlin, Institute of Chemistry, Berlin, Germany (GRID:grid.6734.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2292 8254)
5 Technical University Berlin, Institute of Chemistry, Berlin, Germany (GRID:grid.6734.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2292 8254); University of Manitoba, Department of Chemistry, Winnipeg, Canada (GRID:grid.21613.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9609)