Abstract

Lifestyle interventions involving exercise training offset the adverse effects of androgen deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer. Yet provision of integrated exercise pathways in cancer care is sparse. This study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of an embedded supervised exercise training intervention into standard prostate cancer care in a single-arm, multicentre prospective cohort study. Feasibility included recruitment, retention, adherence, fidelity and safety. Acceptability of behaviourally informed healthcare and exercise professional training was assessed qualitatively. Despite the imposition of lockdown for the COVID-19 pandemic, referral rates into and adherence to, the intervention was high. Of the 45 men eligible for participation, 79% (n = 36) received the intervention and 47% (n = 21) completed the intervention before a government mandated national lockdown was enforced in the United Kingdom. Patients completed a mean of 27 min of aerobic exercise per session (SD = 3.48), at 77% heart rate maximum (92% of target dose), and 3 sets of 10 reps of 3 resistance exercises twice weekly for 12 weeks, without serious adverse event. The intervention was delivered by 26 healthcare professionals and 16 exercise trainers with moderate to high fidelity, and the intervention was deemed highly acceptable to patients. The impact of societal changes due to the pandemic on the delivery of this face-to-face intervention remain uncertain but positive impacts of embedding exercise provision into prostate cancer care warrant long-term investigation.

Details

Title
Embedding supervised exercise training for men on androgen deprivation therapy into standard prostate cancer care: a feasibility and acceptability study (the STAMINA trial)
Author
Reale, Sophie 1 ; Turner, Rebecca R 1 ; Sutton, Eileen 2 ; Steed, Liz 3 ; Taylor, Stephanie J, C 3 ; Morrissey, Dylan 4 ; Doherty, Patrick 5 ; Greenfield, Diana M 6 ; Collinson, Michelle 7 ; Hewison, Jenny 8 ; Brown, Janet 9 ; Ibeggazene Saïd 1 ; Mason, Malcolm 10 ; Rosario, Derek J 11 ; Bourke, Liam 1 

 Sheffield Hallam University, Allied Health Professionals, Radiotherapy and Oncology, Sheffield, UK (GRID:grid.5884.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 0303 540X) 
 University of Bristol, Population Health Sciences, Bristol, UK (GRID:grid.5337.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7603) 
 Queen Mary University of London, Institute for Population Health Sciences, London, UK (GRID:grid.4868.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2171 1133) 
 Queen Mary University of London, Sports and Exercise Medicine, School of Medicine and Dentistry, William Harvey Research Institute, London, UK (GRID:grid.4868.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2171 1133) 
 University of York, Department of Health Sciences, York, UK (GRID:grid.5685.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9668) 
 Sheffield Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Specialised Cancer Services, Sheffield, UK (GRID:grid.451052.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0581 2008) 
 University of Leeds, Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, Leeds, UK (GRID:grid.9909.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8403) 
 University of Leeds, School of Medicine, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Leeds, UK (GRID:grid.9909.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8403) 
 University of Sheffield, Department of Oncology and Metabolism, Sheffield, UK (GRID:grid.11835.3e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9262) 
10  Cardiff University, School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK (GRID:grid.5600.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 0807 5670) 
11  Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Department of Urology, Sheffield, UK (GRID:grid.31410.37) (ISNI:0000 0000 9422 8284) 
Publication year
2021
Publication date
2021
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group
e-ISSN
20452322
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2540468109
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.