It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Major disasters such as extreme weather events can magnify and exacerbate pre-existing social disparities, with disadvantaged populations bearing disproportionate costs. Despite the implications for equity and emergency planning, we lack a quantitative understanding of how these social fault lines translate to different behaviours in large-scale emergency contexts. Here we investigate this problem in the context of Hurricane Harvey, using over 30 million anonymized GPS records from over 150,000 opted-in users in the Greater Houston Area to quantify patterns of disaster-inflicted relocation activities before, during, and after the shock. We show that evacuation distance is highly homogenous across individuals from different types of neighbourhoods classified by race and wealth, obeying a truncated power-law distribution. Yet here the similarities end: we find that both race and wealth strongly impact evacuation patterns, with disadvantaged minority populations less likely to evacuate than wealthier white residents. Finally, there are considerable discrepancies in terms of departure and return times by race and wealth, with strong social cohesion among evacuees from advantaged neighbourhoods in their destination choices. These empirical findings bring new insights into mobility and evacuations, providing policy recommendations for residents, decision-makers, and disaster managers alike.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Northeastern University, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Boston, USA (GRID:grid.261112.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 2173 3359)
2 Northeastern University, Department of Political Science, Boston, USA (GRID:grid.261112.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 2173 3359)
3 Northeastern University, Network Science Institute, Boston, USA (GRID:grid.261112.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 2173 3359)
4 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Department of Computer Science, Troy, USA (GRID:grid.33647.35) (ISNI:0000 0001 2160 9198)
5 Harvard University, Department of Sociology, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.38142.3c) (ISNI:000000041936754X); Accenture, Arlington, USA (GRID:grid.455598.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 5898 4321)
6 Ryerson University, Department of Physics, Toronto, Canada (GRID:grid.68312.3e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9422)