1. Introduction
Fungal diseases are a tremendous medical problem. The frequency of fungal infections continues to climb, predominantly because of an increased number of immunocompromised and critically ill patients [1,2]. The mortality from invasive fungal infections is often greater than 50%, and it is estimated that more than 2.3 million people die from fungal infections each year [3]. Lack of effective therapy is largely responsible for the high mortality [4]. The therapeutic options for fungal infections are limited and associated with toxicities, which has led to an interest in immune therapeutic approaches [5]. One such therapeutic target is granule-dependent release of antifungal molecules used in host defence.
Immunity is a sophisticated, coordinated system consisting of highly specialized innate and adaptive immune cells that play vital roles against fungi. Both innate and adaptive immune cells are involved in fungal host defence, such as against organisms among the Ascomycota (Aspergillus fumigatus, Candida albicans), Basidiomycota (Cryptococcus neoformans), and Zygomycota (Rhizopus oryzae). NK cells, eosinophils, mast cells, neutrophils, and T cells boast intracellular membrane bound vesicles, which store compounds that can be immediately deployed for host defence. These intracellular compartments have been called “secretory vesicles”, “secretory lysosomes”, or “granules”. These organelles form when products of the trans-Golgi network are packaged into transport vesicles. Transport vesicles move the cargo to an endosome that undergoes acidification and processing of the cargo leading to formation of the secretory vesicles. Secretory vesicles contain molecules that induce fungal cell death or stasis when immune cells engage an invading pathogen.
Immune cells not only act independently, but also work in a complex manner by releasing factors and cytokines that signal and/or prime each other to effectively clear infections. Depending on the immune cells, granules are deployed in different ways. The immune cell can bind to the pathogen and antimicrobial compounds are released directly onto the pathogen. Alternately, immune cells can bind to another host cell that contains the pathogen. In this case, the antimicrobial compounds are released in a directed way through an immunological synapse (IS) between the immune cell and the host cell containing the pathogen, leading to death of the microbe. Immune cells may not bind directly to the pathogen, but receive signals from the pathogen or surrounding cells, causing release of antimicrobial compounds in a non-directional way in the vicinity of the pathogen. Finally, granules are released onto the pathogen surface when it is trapped in an extracellular matrix made up of DNA. Granules are also recruited to phagosomes that contains the engulfed pathogen, but this intracellular pathway will not be the subject of this review.
The mechanisms and machinery by which granules are trafficked within immune cells and released on to the pathogen vary depending on the immune cells and target pathogens. However, the immune cell subtypes share similarities in activation, signaling, and granule trafficking towards the plasma membrane. This review describes our current understanding of the granules in immune cells. We highlight the similarities in different characteristics and processes in granule development, content, storage, signaling, trafficking, release, and function in various immune cell types during host defence against fungal infections. Understanding these characteristics may allow for knowledge transfer between scientists working with different cells and may lead to insights into the development of immune-based therapeutics for different cells employing similar granule-mediated mechanisms.
2. Granule Characteristics in Different Immune Cell Subsets
Despite common features, secretory vesicles are described and classified differently for each immune cell. Granules are usually classified by size, morphology, and density using electron microscopy. If the buoyant densities of granules differ, they can be separated by centrifugation, which allows proteomic approaches to identify constituents. NK cells have three types of granules: type 1, type 2, and intermediate [6], which are grouped by their morphology (Table 1 and Figure 1, panel Aa, Ab, and Ac). Type 1 granules are 50–700 nm in diameter and filled with a dense core surrounded by a thin layer of vesicles [7]. Type 2 granules are 200–1000 nm in diameter and characterized by multiple vesicles and membrane whorls [6]. Intermediate granules have dense cores and multiple vesicles and are less abundant than type 2 granules [8]. Type 1 granules are fully mature while other types represent different stages of granule development [6]. Different components of the granules contain different constituents. The dense core contains cytolytic proteins, while the multivesicular domains contain lysosomal proteins (Table 2) [7]. By contrast, the granules of CD8+ T cells have not been separated by morphology. Rather, granules are characterized in one group with variable granule morphology that resembles the spectrum of granules in NK cells ranging from 100 to 1300 nm [9]. Granules in cytotoxic T cells can be separated by sucrose gradients (Table 1), which allows for separation of different proteins in granules of different buoyant density [10].
Granulocytes (neutrophils, eosinophils, and mast cells) have more than one type of granule and may contain different cytolytic contents (Figure 1, panel B, C, and D). Mast cell granules are distinguished by their membrane proteins and serotonin rather than their microscopic appearance (Table 1). Type I and II mast cell granules all contain proteins of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II, β-hexosaminidase, lysosome-associated membrane protein (LAMP)-1 and 2, and mannose 6-phosphate receptor (M6PR), while type III granules lack MHC class II, LAMP-1, LAMP-2, and M6PR. Type I granules, in contrast to type II and III have serotonin [14].
Eosinophils have two types of granules: primary and secondary specific (Table 1) [15]. Sizes range from 500 to 1000 nm [16]. The secondary specific granules have a distinctive dense crystalline core that is surrounded by a less dense matrix and enclosed by a trilaminar membrane [17]. The primary granules are smaller than the secondary specific granules and lack a crystalline core [12]. Granules in all immune cell types appear as distinct, electron dense membrane bound intracytoplasmic organelles that can also be seen on light microscopy. Granules are of similar size (50–1300 nm), with most in the range of 200–500 nm.
Neutrophils have three types of granules: primary azurophilic, secondary specific, and tertiary gelatinase granules (Table 1). These granules are classified by their sizes and intensity on electron microscopy as well as their granule content. Primary granules are electron dense and range from 500 to 1000 nm [18]. Secondary granules range from 200 nm to 500 nm and tertiary granules have a mean diameter of 187 nm [18,19].
3. Cytolytic Contents of the Granules in Each Immune Cell Subtypes
The contents of granules in cytotoxic lymphocytes including NK cells and CD8+ T lymphocytes consists of cytolytic and pro-apoptotic proteins including perforin (cytolysin), granulysin, granzymes, the cationic protein LL 37, FasL, and lysosomal membrane glycoprotein LGP120 (Table 1) [7]. In T cells, different proteins have been isolated from different granule fractions. For example, perforin is isolated from one fraction separated by gradient centrifugation, while granzyme B and granulysin are in another (Table 1) [10].
Likewise, different granules in neutrophils and eosinophils contain different cytolytic molecules. Primary azurophilic granules in neutrophils contain proteases (neutrophil elastase, cathepsin G, proteinase 3), peroxidases (myeloperoxidase), and membrane cytolytic molecules (defensins and bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein (BPI) (Table 1) [20]. Secondary specific granules contain iron binding proteins (lactoferrins), membrane cytolytic molecules (defensins, BPI) and peroxidases (MPO). Tertiary gelatinase granules contain matrix metalloproteinases, sialidase, azurocidin, and lysozyme (Table 1) [20].
Primary granules of eosinophils contain galactin-10, which forms Charcot-Leyden crystals and secondary specific granules that contain eosinophil peroxidase (EPO), major basic protein (MBP), eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), and eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN) (Table 1) [15,21].
While mast cells contain three types of granules, based on membrane proteins, they do not have differences in cytolytic content. These granules contain cytolytic molecules such as chymase, tryptase, mast cell carboxypeptidase A3 (CPA3), and granzymes [14]. Of note, CPA3 functions together with chymases and tryptases to degrade proteins and peptides [22]. There is evidence that secreted factors from mast cell granules mediate antifungal activity against C. albicans, although it is not known which factors are key to the process [23].
4. Mechanisms of Fungal Recognition, Activation, and Cytotoxicity
Granule trafficking is activated when immune cells recognize the fungal pathogen through pathogen associated molecular patterns through their pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs), NK cell activating receptors, or the T-cell receptor (TCR). Ligands for PRRs are usually the components (e.g., carbohydrates) of the fungal cell wall, or fungal-derived RNA or DNA, which are not found in mammals. The PRRs include C-type lectin receptors (CLRs), toll-like receptors (TLRs), nucleotide binding and oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptors (NLRs), and retinoic acid inducible gene (RIG)-like receptors (RLRs). NK cells have activating receptors that function as PPRs, such as NKp30 [24], NKp46 (natural cytotoxicity receptor-1), and CD56 for fungal recognitions [25,26]. These receptors are required for activation by Cryptococcus, Candida, and Aspergillus [27].
Fungal carbohydrates, such as β-glucan, α -glucan, and chitin are well-known ligands of the fungal cell wall that are recognized by innate immune cells, such as NK cells, neutrophils, mast cells, eosinophils, and macrophages [27]. CD8+ T cells recognize fungi via the TCR by cross-presentation where fungal antigens are presented on the major histocompatibility complex-1 (MHC-1) on antigen presenting cells, such as dendritic cells after phagocytosing the fungal target cell [28]. A signaling cascade is activated, and granules are trafficked to the target cells upon their recognition.
5. Signal Transduction Leading to Degranulation
The signaling pathway leading to degranulation involves a complex network of pathways that orchestrate many responses that ultimately lead to degranulation. The main signaling mechanisms include immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs (ITAMs)/Syk ➔ integrins, G-proteins and MyD88 (Table 2 and Figure 2). The signaling pathway of NK cells operate downstream of ITAM-dependent and ITAM-independent motifs activated by redundant Src family kinases [29,30]. Syk-1 then initiates activation of two signal pathways: the phosphoinositide-3 kinase (PI3K) ➔ extracellular receptor kinase (ERK)2 and the phospholipase Cγ (PLCγ) ➔ JNK1 pathways [31,32], through which polarization of the microtubule organizing center (MTOC) and cytolytic granules occur before subsequent degranulation of the cytotoxic granules into the target cell [6,33,34,35]. Additionally, Cryptococcus concurrently activates the β1-integrin pathway leading to activation of integrin linked kinase (ILK) ➔ Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate (Rac) ➔ PI3K ➔ Erk [36]. Here, activation of both Src family kinases and Rac are required during fungal mediated degranulation [36]. For CD8+ T cells, this process is mediated by engagement of the TCR/CD3 complex, which lead to a signaling cascade utilizing Src family kinases, such as LymphoCyte-specific protein tyrosine Kinase (LCK), which phosphorylate ITAMs ➔ Zeta-chain-Associated Protein kinase 70(ZAP70) ➔ Linker for Activation of T cells (LAT)/PLCγ/interleukin-2-inducible T-cell kinase (ITK) ➔ Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) ➔ Inositol triphosphate (IP3) ➔ Ca2+ influx ➔ degranulation [37]. Another series of signaling cascades is required during granule trafficking for MTOC polarization. MTOC polarization signaling starts after PIP2 is hydrolyzed leading to the formation of lipid second messenger’s diacylglycerol (DAG). This in turn leads to synaptic recruitment of protein kinase C (PKC) isoforms, which leads to MTOC and granule polarization to the plasma membrane [37]. Mast cell degranulation is achieved when their PPRs (TLR4), cytokine receptors (CCR1), c-KIT, or FcεRI are engaged. The corresponding ligands for these PRRs respectively are HSP70, CCL3, stem cell factor (SCF), and IgE. The receptors signal via a variety of pathways that lead to phosphorylation of LAT [38]. Phosphorylated-LAT triggers PLCγ and PI3K phosphorylation followed by a chain of downstream signaling protein phosphorylation, resulting in degranulation [38]. Interestingly, the central role of PLCγ bears similarities to that of NK and CD8+ T cells in mediating degranulation and trafficking, although there are differences.
Granule trafficking and degranulation in eosinophils is initiated following the engagement of chemokine receptor 3 (CCR3), leading to the association of G-protein leading to the MAPK pathway and then the subsequent activation of PI3K. This precedes AKT and ERK activation, which modulates the activation of downstream effectors that leads to microtubule reorganization and subsequent granule degranulation [39]. Additionally, β2-integrin has been implicated in eosinophil degranulation [40].
In neutrophils, the signaling mechanism starts with the activation of neutrophils through surface receptors (PRRs, GPCRs, FcRs, selectins, and integrins) that triggers the activation of a kinase cascade (Src family kinases and protein signaling kinase 2 (Pyk2) [13]. Central downstream effectors of these kinases target cytoskeletal remodeling. These central effectors include Vav, PLC, and PI3K, which activates Rac and paxillin. This facilitates microtubule polarization, and the generation of PIP3, which facilitates polarization and actin remodeling at the degranulation site [13].
6. Granule Trafficking Leading to Degranulation
Granule mobilization and trafficking varies in different immune cells, however, there are general schemes that are common among all cells (Table 3). Initially, granules begin to be recruited along the microtubule when activated. Kinesins and dyneins are key microtubule transport proteins that function as motor proteins in the positive and negative direction, respectively, to traffic the granules either by moving the microtubules with an attached granule or by moving the granule on the microtubule. Some kinesins organize the microtubule network, while others are responsible for cargo transport. Examples of these kinesins, respectively, are Eg5-kinesin and kinesin-1. Eg5 kinesin has an extensive role in microtubule stabilization and cross-linking, where it mediates microtubule movement [41]. By contrast, kinesin-1 (Table 3) is a cargo binding motor protein that is responsible for terminal transport of the granules to the cell membrane and has been characterized in CD8+ T cells [42], NK cells [43], and mast cells [44]. The initial phase of granule mobilization is mediated by dyneins where it directs the granules to the minus-end of the microtubules and towards the MTOC. The MTOC is then polarized by the action of dynein, with which the granules are polarized mediated by kinesin-1 towards the synapse before degranulation. The degranulation step of the granules at the terminal where they dock and fuse with the plasma membrane is regulated by a family of soluble N-ethylmaleimide sensitive factor (NSF) attachment protein REceptors (SNAREs) [45]. Here, the MTOC docks at the terminal where granules can move to the synapse and degranulate. The degranulation process is mediated by SNAREs, which are primary mediators of membrane docking and fusion. The vSNARE on the vesicle binds to the tSNARE on the target membrane allowing Rab to hydrolyze GTP, locking the tSNARE and vSNARE together, allowing for fusion of the vesicle and plasma membrane and release of granule contents.
7. Function of Granule Proteins
7.1. Perforin
Perforin is a pore-forming cytolytic protein that is expressed by NK, CD8+ T cells and in one report by neutrophils (Table 1) [46,47]. When released, perforin inserts into the target cell membrane and oligomerizes in a Ca2+ dependent manner to form pores or damage the cell membranes (Table 4) [48]. The resultant pores allow for entrance of other granule proteins to enter the target cells. As such, perforin plays a key role in the cytolytic process in targets, such as tumors and fungi. In fungal studies, evidence showed that perforin is required in NK cell antifungal activity against C. neoformans [34]. While in CD8+ T cells, granulysin rather than perforin is required during antifungal activity against C. neoformans [49].
7.2. Granzymes
In humans, immune cells can express five types of granzymes: granzymes A, B, H, K, and M [50]. These are serine proteases that cleave proteins inducing cell death [50,51,52]. In mammalian cells, granzymes activate a cascade of enzymatic cleavages leading to apoptosis or cleavage of proteins that are critical for viability (Table 4) [50]. In bacteria, granzymes disrupt electron transport leading to superoxide anion and thwarting bacterial oxidative defences [53]. Granzymes often work in conjunction with perforin. Perforin causes pores or damages the target cell membrane, which enables granzymes to enter and exert their cytotoxic effect on tumor cells. While the functions of granzymes are well known in tumor target killing, little is known about their role in killing of fungal cells. Other immune cell subtypes also contain granzymes including neutrophils [54], eosinophils [55], mast cells [56], which play a role in inflammation, antitumor activity, and antibacterial activity. Interestingly, since most granule-containing immune cell subtypes express granzymes, it is a common cytolytic molecule utilized for a wide variety of responses including fungi.
7.3. Other Proteins Causing Membrane Permeability
Defensins have long been characterized as antimicrobial compounds against fungal pathogens such as Candida albicans [57]. These cationic molecules are predominantly expressed by neutrophils but can be found in NK cells and CD8+ T cells [58]. The function of defensins is to permeabilize the pathogen membrane and inhibit cell wall synthesis that leads to cytolysis of target cell [59,60]. Their ability to permeabilize membranes is similar to that of granulysin and perforin. The pores formed by defensins are approximately 25 nm [60], which is large enough to permit cytolytic molecules such as granzymes which are 2.5 nm in stokes radius to cross the plasma membrane [61].
LL-37 is an antimicrobial molecule of the cathelicidin family that is found in neutrophils, NK cells, and CD8+ T cells (Table 1 and Table 4). LL-37 acts on the lipoprotein membranes of pathogens leading to membrane damage, and therefore works similarly to perforin, granulysin, and defensins by affecting the cell membrane and the cell wall of C. albicans [62].
Bacterial Permeability Inducing protein (BPI) is a 50 kDa protein that binds to lipopolysaccharides found on the cell membrane of gram-negative bacteria leading to permeability of the membrane and cell death [63]. Its antibacterial action is due to its displacing outer membrane calcium and magnesium ions, leading to membrane permeability [63]. BPI also displaces divalent cations, which perturbs arrangement of LPS molecules and results in membrane rupture [63]. BPI is present in neutrophils and eosinophils [63], but its function in fungal killing is unknown.
7.4. Proteases—Neutrophil Elastase (NE), Cathepsins, Proteinase 3, Matrix Metalloproteinases
NE is a key effector molecule in neutrophils during fungal infections (Table 1). NE deficiency can result in impaired killing of Candida and Aspergillus [64]. This molecule is closely related to the family of serine proteases, and cleaves proteins in the extracellular matrix and, thereby, facilitate fungal killing by regulating extracellular trap formation (Table 4) [65]. Further details of this mechanism are discussed in later sections. Cathepsin G is a serine protease that is known to be able to degrade extracellular matrix components and may have antimicrobial specific function (Table 4) [66]. The role of NE and cathepsin G is made evident by mice lacking NE or cathepsin G, which are more susceptible to fungal infections [64]. Proteinase 3 is an enzyme that processes LL-37 to its active form after neutrophil activation [67]. Proteinase 3 also has antimicrobial properties that are independent of its protease activity against C. albicans, but the mechanism of action is unknown [65]. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are involved in cleavage or extracellular matrix components such as gelatin and collagen [68]. They also play a role in leukocyte migration [68].
Secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor (SLPI) is an antiprotease that is highly enriched in the secondary granules of neutrophils (Table 4). It has been reported that SLPI has antifungal activity to Aspergillus fumigatus and Candida albicans [69].
7.5. Oxidative Agents: Myeloperoxidase (MPO) and Eosinophil Peroxidase (EPO)
MPO is a key effector molecule in neutrophils during fungal infections. MPO acts by converting H2O2 and halide ions to reactive oxygen species, which are highly toxic to microbes (Table 4) [70]. EPO is the major oxidative enzyme of eosinophils and functions like MPO by catalyzing the formation of oxidizing agents, which converts H2O2 + halide (Cl-) into hypochlorous acid (HOCl), which is toxic to microbes, such as the bacteria Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Table 4) [71]. The evidence that EPO has a cytolytic role against fungi is limited [72].
7.6. Iron Scavengers
Lactoferrin is a constituent of granules that is an iron-binding protein that is known for its iron-sequestering function that prevents iron uptake in Candida and Cryptococcus, leading to cell death [73,74], and inhibition of A. fumigatus conidia germination [75].
7.7. Alarmins: Azurocidin and Eosinophil-Derived Neurotoxin (EDN)
Azurocidin is a protein in azurophilic granules that is known for its antimicrobial functions by binding to the cell surfaces of the target cell as well as acting as a chemotactic agent for monocytes and macrophages (Table 4) [76]. EDN is released in response to Alternaria and Penicillium [77] and is known to be cytotoxic against helminth parasites and have antiviral activity due to its ribonuclease activity but its functions against fungi is unknown (Table 4) [78,79].
7.8. Iron scavengers
Lysozyme exerts it antimicrobial activity through damaging the cell wall of fungi by hydrolyzing the β1–4 glycosidic bond between N-acetylmuramic acid and N-acetylglucosamine, which are structural components of fungal chitin (Table 4) [80].
7.9. Major Basic Protein (MBP) and Eosinophil-Cationic Protein (ECP)
MBP and ECP are effector molecules known to have antifungal roles against Alternaria alternata [77]. MBP functions by disrupting the lipid bilayer membrane, resulting in cell damage [81]. ECP is a ribonuclease that binds to the cell wall and cell membrane. Although the mechanism is unknown in fungi bacterial ECP binds and destabilizes membranes which would result in cell death (Table 4) [82].
8. The Cells That Degranulate
8.1. NK Cells
NK cells are cytotoxic lymphocytes that degranulate to induce cell death. In addition to being cytotoxic for tumor cells, NK cells can also kill fungi. NK cell cytotoxicity is activated through ligation of the activating receptor with the respective ligand expressed by Cryptococcus, Candida, and Aspergillus leading to phosphorylation of signaling molecules downstream of the receptor [83]. NK cells mobilize perforin-containing granules along the microtubules in a stepwise manner in response to Cryptococcus prior to degranulation (Figure 3) [35]. Initial trafficking is characterized by granule movement away from the MTOC and immune synapse (counter-convergence and counter-polarization, respectively). This is followed by movement of the granules toward one another (congregation), movement toward the MTOC (convergence) and polarization of the MTOC and granules to the synapse (Figure 3) [35]. The events leading to polarization and position of granules at the synapse are unique to NK cell killing of fungi. These various trafficking events are orchestrated by the microtubules and the MTOC as well as kinesins and dynein [35,84]. Eg5 kinesin is a motor protein involved in mitosis. In NK cell response to Cryptococcus, Eg5 kinesin is responsible for initial granule counter-convergence and MTOC counter-polarization [35], which along with dynein are required for granule congregation, convergence, and polarization [35]. Once polarized to the IS, granules are released into the IS where perforin and other cytolytic molecules such as granzymes enter the target fungal cell. Perforin is a key effector molecule that NK cells use against Cryptococcus and Candida [24,85]. Perforin is presumed to make pores on the membrane through which granzymes and other cytolytic molecules enter into the target as it does in tumor cells [46]. Whether granzymes or other cytolytic molecules contained within the granules play a role in fungal killing is unknown. Kinesin-1, a cargo transport motor protein, is involved in the terminal granule transport to the IS in tumor targets [43], but its role in anti-fungal granule trafficking remains unknown. At the IS, granule exocytosis is mediated by syntaxin-11 which is an atypical Q-SNARE [45]. Syntaxin-11 is transported to the IS before granules fuse where it helps granules dock, prime, and fuse at the cell membrane. This is crucial for NK cell degranulation and without which NK cells failed to kill tumor cells [86]. While the function of syntaxin-11 is essential during NK cell antitumor cytotoxicity, its role in NK cell antifungal activity has not yet been demonstrated.
8.2. CD8+ T Cells
CD8+ T-cells play a major role in controlling fungal infections [87], however, direct killing is still not well understood. Currently, it has been shown that CD8+ T cells use granulysin, a pore-forming antimicrobial molecule, to kill C. neoformans [49]. In addition, yeast specific CD8+ T cells show a non-classical expression of granulysin and granzyme K instead of the classical perforin and granzyme B cytotoxic granule profile [88]. The mechanics of the granule-mediated cytotoxic activity by CD8+ T cells against fungal targets has not been explored. However, there may be similarities to the CD8+ T cell granule-mediated anti-tumor mechanism. The granule-mediated cytotoxicity is activated through two main receptors, T-cell receptor (TCR), and toll-like receptor (TLR)/scavenger receptor [89]. While TCR is the main receptor involved in the whole activation and degranulation signaling cascade, TLRs augment the activation through dendritic cell cross-presenting fungal antigens. While TCR is important for CD8+ T cells in antigen recognition of fungal pathogens, TLRs are used by CD8+ T cells in augmenting its activation during antigen cross-presentation [89]. Sensing of RNA via TLR3 promotes cross presentation by dendritic cells to class I-restricted CD8+ T cells. This is made evident by TLR3-/- mice, which are more susceptible to Aspergillus infection compared to control mice [89,90]. The significance of TLRs in CD8+ T cell recognition and activation is further exemplified when patients with deleterious mutations in TLR3 and TLR4 were more susceptible to various fungal infections [89,91,92,93]. Like NK cells, CD8+ T cells deliver their cytotoxic granule contents into the tumor IS after trafficking to the synapse with the help of microtubules and various motor proteins. Here, kinesins and dyneins are responsible for plus- (away from the MTOC) and minus- (toward the MTOC) end directed movement along microtubule tracks and aids in the MTOC polarization [94]. Dynein is responsible for minus end directed movement that pulls the MTOC toward the IS for successful degranulation at the IS [94]. Kinesins play an important role in plus-end directed movement of granules on the microtubules [95]. Specifically, terminal transport of lytic granules to the tumor IS is mediated by the kinesin-1/Slp3/Rab27a complex where kinesin-1 is essential for the final terminal movement of granules toward the IS [42]. Kinesin-4 was found to be important in regulating microtubule growth to allow for rapid remodeling and polarization of the microtubules when CD8+ T cells are in contact with antigen presenting cells [96]. However, the role of kinesin-4 is unclear in CD8+ T cell cytotoxic mechanisms. As for granule exocytosis at the IS, syntaxin-11 plays the same role as in NK cells during cytotoxic events.
8.3. Mast Cells
Mast cells are granulocytes that are well known for their role in allergic responses, but they also play a role in host defence against pathogens, including fungi. These cells localize at mucosal sites and are found in close contact with epithelial cells and venules and, as such, are considered tissue-resident sentinel cells [97]. Activation of mast cells during allergic responses occurs through IgE receptor-ligand interaction; however, against fungi, activation is achieved through other receptors such as TLR4 and CCR1. In contrast to cytotoxic lymphocyte degranulation, mast cell degranulation occurs at multiple degranulation sites along the plasma membrane and can engage multiple targets at once [98,99]. Mast cells also have directed degranulation via an IS when in contact with IgE and IgG targeted microbial pathogens [99]. A similar observation was made with C. albicans [97]. Although the study did not demonstrate direct degranulation, it did show that mast cells rearranged the α-tubulin cytoskeleton at the synapse and recruited LAMP1+ vesicles at the synapse with the fungus. The authors speculated that degranulation occurs at the IS where the contents are released on to the surface of the fungal cell that is exposed to the IS [97]. Further, the authors observed that mast cells tightly interact with the fungal cell such that it looks like it is engulfing the fungal cell [97]. This interaction is a broad-based invagination reminiscent of a phagocytic cup, in contrast to cytotoxic lymphocytes [97]. The tight phagocytotic-like interaction occurred with the hyphal, but not the yeast form of C. albicans [97], and this interaction was not a result of pathogen invasion of the mast cells but rather actin dynamics of mast cells [97].
The differences between the IS of cytotoxic lymphocytes (NK and CD8+ T cells) and mast cells may provide important insights in mechanisms of degranulation. While mast cell granule trafficking requires microtubules, the polarization of granules does not require MTOC or Golgi apparatus. Instead, polarization requires cytoskeletal rearrangement where extension of microtubules is sufficient to guide granules to the plasma membrane [99,100]. However, these observations were made in studies with Toxoplasma gondii and it remains unknown if this is recapitulated with fungal pathogens [99]. Dyneins are motor proteins involved in granule trafficking, while kinesin-1 moves granules in the positive direction to the membrane and facilitates degranulation. Dynein, complexed with Rab-interacting lysosomal protein (RILP) mediate the retrograde transport of granules along the microtubule network [101]. Like CD8+ T cells and NK cells, degranulation is controlled by kinesin-1 in mast cells [44]. It is not known, however, if kinesin-1 participates in the mast cell response to fungi. Granule exocytosis is enabled by a complex of proteins consisting of synaptosome-associated protein (SNAP)-23, syntaxin-4 (a target(t)-SNARE), and vesicle-associated membrane protein 8 (VAMP-8) [102]. Similar to syntaxin-11 in CD8+ T cells and NK cells, these proteins form complexes and modulate granule exocytosis at the IS [102].
8.4. Eosinophils
Like mast cells, eosinophils are well known in allergic responses, but also have a role against fungal infections. Indeed, eosinophilia is often seen in fungal infections [103]. Eosinophils are known to interact with fungal pathogens, such as A. alternata, A. fumigatus, and C. albicans [77]. The role of kinesins and dyneins in eosinophil microtubule reorganization and granule trafficking is unknown but kinesins and dyneins play a common role in microtubule and cytoskeleton reorganization. Whether they are key to successful granule trafficking and degranulation in eosinophil antifungal activity is unknown. Syntaxin-17 is a SNARE that was found on the granules of eosinophils and is suggested to be involved in membrane trafficking although further characterization of syntaxin-17 is needed [104]. Whether other membrane fusion machinery is involved remains known.
Unlike NK cells and CD8+ T cells that mainly kill targets by direct degranulation, eosinophils kill target cells by utilizing the granule in various ways: classical exocytosis (as in mast cells) or compound exocytosis, cytolysis, or piecemeal degranulation [103]. Compound exocytosis constitutes the fusion of specific granules with each other and with the plasma membrane for granule content release. Cytolysis constitutes the release of intact granules into extracellular milieu. Piecemeal degranulation is a secretory process in which small packets of granules are selectively mobilized to the plasma membrane, fuse, and the granule contents are sequentially released [105]. Piecemeal degranulation is also seen in mast cells and cytotoxic lymphocytes. Eosinophils have been shown to respond to A. alternata by releasing granule contents via compound exocytosis in which vesicles fuse with one another, and by releasing extracellular DNA traps along with release of granules in response to A. fumigatus. There is much to be done to understand the role of degranulation in the role of eosinophils in response to fungi.
8.5. Neutrophils
Neutrophils play a critical role in host defence against fungi, such as Aspergillus spp., Candida spp., and Blastomyces spp. [106,107,108]. They are one of the largest immune cell populations and one of the first responders to pathogenic invasion. These cells employ three different mechanisms to kill: (1) phagocytosis, (2) degranulation, and (3) NETosis. In the case of direct killing by degranulation, granules are transported through actin and microtubule reorganization from cytosol to the plasma membrane [109,110]. The degranulation process at the cell membrane is mediated by two SNARE complexes, made up of syntaxin 4/SNAP-23/VAMP-1 and syntaxin 4/SNAP-23/VAMP-2, during exocytosis of specific and tertiary granules [111]. Degranulation of primary azurophilic granules is mediated by a complex of syntaxin 4 and VAMP-1/VAMP-7 [111]. Granules are also transported in the same way to the phagosomes by actin cytoskeleton remodeling and microtubule assembly during phagocytosis [112]. While movement of granules along microtubule tracks is believed to be mediated by dynein and kinesin motor proteins, there is limited evidence [113,114]. Further, it remains unclear of how granules are trafficked in neutrophils against fungal pathogens. NETosis is a process where neutrophils undergo lysis where a matrix made of DNA or neutrophil extracellular traps (NET), traps the pathogen followed by release granule contents containing “azurosomes”, consisting of eight azurophilic cytolytic granule proteins [110]. The azurosomes form on the granule’s inner membrane in response to NET-inducing stimuli [115]. Secretion of the cytolytic molecules into the extracellular milieu where the fungal pathogen is trapped within the NET would result in death [115].
9. Conclusions
While immune cells deploy secretory vesicles for direct cytotoxic activity against fungal pathogens, they also employ the contents of secretory vesicles to signal a vast array of other responses that lead to the ultimate clearance of the fungal invasion. In this review, we discussed the diversity in granule-mediated mechanisms by the NK cells, CD8+ T cells, mast cells, eosinophils, and neutrophils. Further studies are needed to fully understand granule contents and detailed mechanisms used in response to fungal invasion in different immune cells.
Author Contributions
This review article was written by A.C.M. with the support of S.S.L. and C.H.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was funded by the CIHR grant #365812 and the Jesse Bowden Lloyd Professorship in Immunology.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Acknowledgments
Figure 2 and Figure 3 were created with
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures and Tables
Figure 1. Panel A: Electron micrographs showing the heterogeneity of RNK-16 (NK cell) granules. (Aa) Type I granules. (Ab) A type II granule. (Ac) An intermediate granule with small cores (figure from [7] with permission). Panel B: rat mast cells with dark electron-dense granules (figure from [11] with permission). Panel C: cytoplasmic granules of eosinophils include many membrane-bound, large, dense, spherical, crystalloid-containing granules; less numerous, large, dense, spherical, crystalloid-free granules (figure from [12] with permission). PanelD: neutrophil morphology visualized by electron microscopy. (Top left, top right) The cytosol of a resting cell is filled with vesicles, with primary granules (P) staining intensely dark with diaminobenzidine, while secondary (S) and tertiary (T) granules show more translucent staining. Secretory vesicles (SV) are near the Golgi complex (G). Few mitochondria (M) are observed. (Bottom left, bottom right) (figure from [13] under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)).
Figure 3. Graphical representation of Stages of granule trafficking during an NK cell mediated cytotoxic event against fungal pathogen C. neoformans.
Granule types and contents in various immune cells.
NK Cells | CD8+ T Cells | Mast Cells | Eosinophil | Neutrophil | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Types | Type 1 Granule (fully Formed) |
CytotoxicGranule |
Type 1 Granule |
Primary Granule: |
Primary Azurophilic Granule |
Content | In all granule types: |
In all granule types: |
No distinct difference in content between granule types but are: chymase, tryptase, mast cell carboxypeptidase A3 (CPA3), β-hexosaminidase, histamine, granzyme | Primary Granule: |
Primary Granule: |
Contents listed are an up-to-date comprehensive list of molecules necessary for cell death.
Table 2Pathways and modes of degranulation in various immune cells.
NK Cells | CD8+ T Cells | Mast Cells | Eosinophil | Neutrophil | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pathway | ERK2 ➔ JNK1 ➔ MTOC, granule polarization and cytotoxicity |
TCR ➔ LCK/ZAP70 |
Surface receptors (CCR1, TLR4, KIT, or FcεRI). G-protein, MyD88, Jak/STAT, ➔ Lck-phos ➔ LAT-phos ➔ PLCγ ➔ degranulation | CCR3 ➔ G-protein/Lyn, Fgr, Hck ➔ |
Microtubule assembly: selectins/integrins ➔ |
Mode | Cytotoxic degranulation through direct contact of target cells | Cytotoxic degranulation through direct contact of target cells | Anaphylactic/cytotoxic degranulation |
Piecemeal degranulation |
Cytotoxic degranulation |
The roles of microtubules, dyneins, kinesins, and SNAPs/SNAREs in granule trafficking in various immune cells.
NK Cells | CD8+ T Cells | Mast Cells | Eosinophil | Neutrophil | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Microtubules | Microtubules facilitate the delivery of lytic granules to the synaptic cleft between NK cells and target cells through microtubule associated motor proteins | Microtubules facilitate secretory granule dynamics and degranulation by microtubule protrusion formation and reorganization | Microtubules serve as scaffold for Kinesin and Dynein | Microtubule Reorganization facilitates granule release | Granules are recruited and mobilized by microtubules |
Dynein/Kinesin | Dynein mediates minus directed movement of granules to converge to MTOC |
Terminal transport of lytic granules is mediated by the kinesin-1/Slp3/Rab27a complex |
Kinesin-1 controls mast cell degranulation through PI3K-dependent recruitment to the granular Slp3/Rab27b complex |
Role of motor proteins are unknown | Kinesins are involved in granule-microtubule interactions and movement |
SNAPs/SNAREs | atypical Q-SNARE syntaxin 11/Sec/Munc (SM) family |
atypical Q-SNARE syntaxin 11/Sec/Munc (SM) family |
SNARE proteins function to mediate constitutive trafficking events through both endocytic and secretory pathways | Specific membrane docking of granules through interaction with plasma membrane t-SNARES, SNAP-23, and syntaxin-4 |
Two SNARE complexes, made up of syntaxin 4/SNAP-23/VAMP-1 and syntaxin 4/SNAP-23/VAMP-2, are involved in the exocytosis of specific and tertiary granules |
Classification of proteins found in granules.
Classification of Granule Proteins | Proteins |
---|---|
Cytolytic, Cell wall and Membrane disrupting/pore forming | Perforin, granulysin, defensins, LL-37, eosinophil cationic protein, major basic protein, bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein, azurocidin |
Peptidoglycanases | lysozyme |
Protease Inhibitors | Secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor (SLPI) |
Immune modifying/cytokines | IFN-γ, TNF-α, GM-CSF, VEGF IL-1a, IL-10, IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, IL-16, IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-21, IL-22, IL-25, IL-27 |
Oxidative agents | MPO, EPO |
Pro-apoptotic agents (serine proteases including tryptases and chymases) | Mast cell tryptase and chymases, CPA3, granzymes A, B, H, K, M, |
Chymotrypsin-like serine proteases | Neutrophil elastase, cathepsin G |
Iron binding proteins | Lactoferrin |
Extracellular matrix degrading Matrix Metalloproteinases/Gelatinases | MMP-8, MMP-9 |
Ribonucleases including Cationic proteins | ECP |
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2021 by the authors.
Abstract
Humans have developed complex immune systems that defend against invading microbes, including fungal pathogens. Many highly specialized cells of the immune system share the ability to store antimicrobial compounds in membrane bound organelles that can be immediately deployed to eradicate or inhibit growth of invading pathogens. These membrane-bound organelles consist of secretory vesicles or granules, which move to the surface of the cell, where they fuse with the plasma membrane to release their contents in the process of degranulation. Lymphocytes, macrophages, neutrophils, mast cells, eosinophils, and basophils all degranulate in fungal host defence. While anti-microbial secretory vesicles are shared among different immune cell types, information about each cell type has emerged independently leading to an uncoordinated and confusing classification of granules and incomplete description of the mechanism by which they are deployed. While there are important differences, there are many similarities in granule morphology, granule content, stimulus for degranulation, granule trafficking, and release of granules against fungal pathogens. In this review, we describe the similarities and differences in an attempt to translate knowledge from one immune cell to another that may facilitate further studies in the context of fungal host defence.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Department of Microbiology Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Cumming School of Medicine, University Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada;