1. Introduction
Palm trees represent a family of perennial lianas and consist of many diverse species worldwide, with the fossil record indicating around 65 million years of evolutionary history [1]. Microfungi on palms have been studied, but only a few have been analyzed using morphology and DNA sequence data. Several fungal species are currently unknown to science, with the total number estimated at somewhere between 2.2 and 3.8 million [2]. Thus, palms are a particularly interesting plant family for studying microfungi species unknown to science.
The subclass Xylariomycetidae has recently been updated to contain three orders (Amphisphaeriales, Delonicicolales, and Xylariales) and 35 families [3]. Recently, the family Induratiaceae was introduced in this subclass by Samarakoon et al. [4] with an updated phylogeny of Xylariales. Cainiaceae is a family of particular interest, as all members in this family tend to be found on monocotyledons, the majority of which are grasses [5]. In previous studies, Cainiaceae was accepted in the Xylariales [3,6]. Later, Hongsanan et al. [7], and Wijayawardene et al. [8] assigned Cainiaceae to the Xylariomycetidae as an incertae sedis family.
The Xylariales is one of the largest orders and includes 15 families, 160 genera, and 52 genera incertae sedis [3]. Family Cainiaceae was introduced by Krug [9] to include species of Cainia with unique apical rings in the asci that consist of a series of rings and ascospores with longitudinal germ slits. An asexual morph of Cainiaceae was coelomycetous with black, scattered, immersed pycnidial conidiomata; hyaline, denticulate, sympodially proliferating conidiophores; hyaline, filiform, branched or simple, septate conidiogenous cells with one to three phialides; and hyaline, elongate fusiform, falcate to lunate, unicellular or septate conidia, with pointed ends [10]. At present, seven genera have been accepted into this family (Alishanica, Amphibambusa, Arecophila, Atrotorquata, Cainia, Longiappendispora, and Seynesia) [3,11].
Since 2014, fungal research in Thailand has revealed a high diversity of novel species [12,13,14]. In this study, we found fungal species unknown to science from Thailand. The phylogeny results show that Endocalyx grouped within Cainiaceae, and so we transferred Endocalyx from Apiosporaceae (Amphisphaeriales) to Cainiaceae (Xylariales) based on both morphology and multigene phylogeny. We also introduce the new species Endocalyx metroxyli, collected from the economically important oil palm host (Elaeis guineensis). Lastly, we introduce the new genus Haploanthostomella associated with true sago palm (Metroxylon sagu).
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Collection, Isolation, and Identification
Saprobic fungi growing on dead leaves, petioles and rachis of Elaeis guineensis and Metroxylon sagu were collected in Krabi and Surat Thani Provinces of Thailand, placed in ziplock bags and brought to the mycology laboratory at the Center of Excellence in Fungal Research, and morphological characteristics were observed. Specimens were examined following the methods provided by Konta et al. [15]. Single spore isolates were obtained following the method of Senanayake et al. [16], using malt extract agar (MEA) and incubating at 25–28 °C overnight. Germinating conidia were transferred to new MEA media and pure cultures were kept at 25–28 °C. Specimens and cultures were deposited in the herbarium of Mae Fah Luang University (MFLU) and Mae Fah Luang University Culture Collection (MFLUCC), Chiang Rai, Thailand, respectively. Faces of Fungi and Index Fungorum numbers were registered as outlined in Jayasiri et al. [17] and Index Fungorum [18].
2.2. DNA Extraction and Amplification (PCR)
Genomic DNA was extracted from fruiting bodies of Haploanthostomella elaeidis and fungal mycelium of Endocalyx metroxyli. DNA extraction and amplification were followed Dissanayake et al. [19]. Konta et al.’s method [16] was followed for PCR amplification of ITS, LSU, SSU, tef1-α and rpb2, while O’Donnell and Cigelnik’s method [20] was followed for PCR amplification of the tub2 region. Amplification was done using the primers ITS5 and ITS4 for the internal transcribed spacer regions and intervening 5.8S rDNA (ITS), the primers LR5 and LR0R for the large subunit (LSU) rRNA gene, the primer pair fRPB2-5f and fRPB2-7cR for the RNA polymerase II second largest subunit (rpb2) gene, and the primers T1 and T22 for the partial gene β-tubulin (tub2). PCR amplifications were performed using 1× PCR buffer with 8.5 μL ddH2O, 12.5 μL 2× Easy Taq PCR SuperMix (mixture of Easy Taq TM DNA Polymerase, dNTPs and optimized buffer (Beijing Trans Gen Biotech Co., Beijing, China)), 2 μL of DNA template, and 1 μL each of forward and reverse primers (10 pM) in a final volume of 25 μL. The cycle conditions in the initiation step were started at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles at 95 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 50 s, 72 °C for 30 s (for ITS, LSU); 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles at 95 °C for 1 min, 54 °C for 2 min, 72 °C for 1:5 min (for rpb2); 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles at 94 °C for 1 min, 52 °C for 1 min, 72 °C for 1:5 min (for tub2); a final elongation step at 72 °C for 10 min and a final hold at 4 °C were done as the last steps. Purification and sequencing were performed by Sangon Biotech Co., Shanghai, China. Consensus sequences were computed using SeqMan software, and new sequences generated in this study were deposited in GenBank (Table 1).
2.3. Phylogenetic Analyses
The consensus sequences were put through a BLAST search in the NCBI GenBank nucleotide database to search for the fungal sequences of closest relatives that have been deposited in the NCBI database. Dissanayake et al.’s study [19] was followed for the phylogenetic analyses. Voglmayr and Beenken’s study [79] was used as a reference of the dataset. Both individual and combined ITS, LSU, rpb2, and tub2 nucleotide sequences were analyzed. A total of 151 taxa were used for the phylogenetic analyses in order to find the taxonomic placement of each species. Three genera viz. Delonicicola, Furfurella (Delonicicolaceae), and Leptosillia (Leptosilliaceae) in Delonicicolales were used as the outgroup taxa.
The MAFFT online program was used to obtain initial alignments for each locus [94]. Alignments were manually edited and single gene sequence data sets were combined using MEGA7 [95]. The Alignment Transformation Environment online program was used to convert the file format [96]. MrModeltest [97] was used to find the best model for maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian analyses (BYPP). The six simultaneous Markov chains were run for 20,000,000 generations and trees were sampled every 1000th generation. Bayesian posterior probabilities from MCMC were evaluated with a final average standard deviation of the split frequency of <0.01. Bootstrap values for ML equal to or greater than 50% and BYPP equal to or greater than 0.90 are given at the nodes (Figure 1). Fig Tree v1.4.0 was used to configure the phylogenetic trees [98] and edited using Microsoft Office PowerPoint 2010 and Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Adobe Systems Incorporated, 345 Park Avenue, San Jose, CA, USA).
3. Results
3.1. Morphology and Phylogeny
The combined dataset comprised 151 taxa from selected taxa in Amphisphaeriales, Delonicicolales, and Xylariales (Table 1). The RAxML analyses of the combined dataset yielded the best-scoring tree (Figure 1) with a final ML optimization likelihood value of −126584.196783. The matrix had 4598 distinct alignment patterns, with 65.07% undetermined characters or gaps. Estimated base frequencies were: A = 0.243574, C = 0.257762, G = 0.258457, T = 0.240207; substitution rates AC = 1.296272, AG = 3.089851, AT = 1.400263, CG = 1.060328, CT = 9.900102, GT = 1.000000; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.443932. Tree-Length = 25.372161. Bayesian analysis resulted in a tree with similar topology and clades as the ML tree. Phylogenetic analyses of the combined ITS, LSU, rpb2, and tub2 loci show two novel taxa within the monospecific genus Haploanthostomella (type species Haploanthostomella elaeidis; Xylariales incertae sedis) and the novel taxa Endocalyx metroxyli, with the genus Endocalyx being placed in Cainiaceae.
3.1.1. Haploanthostomella Konta & K.D. Hyde. gen. nov.
Index Fungorum number: IF557876; Facesoffungi number: FoF09173
Etymology: “haplos” (απλός) in Greek means single; Anthostomella refers to its morphological similarity to Anthostomella.
Saprobic on dead leaves and rachis in terrestrial habitats. Sexual morph: Ascomata immersed in the host epidermis, beneath a clypeus, visible as slightly raised blackened areas, dark brown to black, coriaceous, solitary or aggregated into clusters, scattered, with an ostiolar canal. Peridial wall thick, comprised of several layers of cells, outwardly comprising dark brown cells of textura prismatica and inwardly comprising hyaline cells of textura angularis. Paraphyses septate, tapering hyphae-like, hyaline. Asci eight-spored, unitunicate, clavate to cylindric, short pedicellate, with J-, apical ring. Ascospores uni–biseriate into the asci, unicellular, obovoid, fusoid, hyaline or brown to dark brown, verrucose with a mucilaginous cap at apex. Germ slit straight, less than spore-length. Asexual morph: Not observed.
Type species: Haploanthostomella elaeidis Konta & K.D. Hyde.
Notes: Anthostomella species were proven to be polyphyletic, and it is of no surprise that a new genus with anthostomella-like characteristics was discovered in this study [99]. Phylogenetic analyses based on a single dataset of ITS (supporting information section) and combined sequence data indicated that Haploanthostomella belongs to Xylariales genera incertae sedis, separating well from other genera but with low bootstrap values (Figure 1). According to the phylogenetic tree (Figure 1), seven genera (Ceratocladium, Circinotrichum, Gyrothrix, Idriella, Neoanthostomella, Virgaria and Xenoanthostomella) are closely related to our new genus, but morphological characteristics of these genera are different. The genera Neoanthostomella, Virgaria, and Xenoanthostomella were compared morphologically since they are similar to our new taxon. Haploanthostomella differs from Virgaria, Neoanthostomella, and Xenoanthostomella in having a J- apical ring, fusoid-obovoid ascospores, and verrucose with a mucilaginous cap at the apex, while Virgaria has asci with a J+ apical ring and smooth-walled elliposidal ascospores lacking of a mucilaginous sheath; Neoanthostomella smooth-walled elliposidal ascospores surrounded by a thick mucilaginous sheath; Xenoanthostomella has unilocular ascoma, and ascospores lacking germ slits and mucilaginous sheaths [13,72,89]. Therefore, Haploanthostomella is described here as a new genus based on phylogeny coupled with morphology. In addition, we provide a key to genera with Anthostomella-like characteristics.
3.1.2. Haploanthostomella elaeidis Konta & K.D. Hyde., sp. nov.
Index Fungorum number: IF557877, Facesoffungi number: FoF09174 (Figure 2)
Etymology: Referring to the genus of palm trees Elaeis Jacq.
Holotype: MFLU 20-0522.
Saprobic on dead leaves and rachis of Elaeis guineensis. Sexual morph: Ascomata 160–280 × 130–350 μm (x¯ = 220 × 240 μm, n = 20), immersed in the host epidermis, beneath a clypeus, visible as slightly raised blackened areas, dark brown to black, coriaceous, solitary or aggregated into clusters, scattered, with an ostiolar canal. Peridial wall 13–45 μm wide, thick, comprising several layers of cells, outwardly comprising dark brown cells of textura irregularis and inwardly comprising hyaline cells of textura prismatica, 7–20 μm wide. Paraphyses 1.5–4.5 μm wide, septate, hyphae-like, hyaline. Asci 50–90 × 10–15 μm (x¯ = 70 × 12 μm, n = 40), 8-spored, unitunicate, clavate to cylindric, short pedicellate, with J- apical ring. Ascospores 10–18 × 5–8 μm (x¯ = 14 × 6 μm, n = 100), uni–biseriate into the asci, unicellular, obovoid, fusoid, hyaline to light brown when immature and brown to dark brown when mature, mostly one, rarely two-guttulate, cell wall verrucose, with a mucilaginous cap at the apex. Germslit 3–6 μm length (x¯ = 5 μm, n = 50), straight, less than spore-length. Asexual morph: Not observed.
Material examined: THAILAND, Surat Thani Province, on dead leaves and rachis of Elaeis guineensis Jacq. (Arecaceae) on the ground, 21 July 2017, Sirinapa Konta, SRWD12 (MFLU 20-0522, holotype).
Notes: A BLAST search of H. elaeidis ITS sequence shows 83.87% similarity with Gyrothrix oleae (CPC 37069); LSU sequence shows 95.95% similarity with Gyrothrix eucalypti (CPC 36066); and rpb2 sequence shows 80.95% similarity with Lopadostoma meridionale (LG). Only the sexual morph of H. elaeidis was found in nature, and we could not obtain a pure culture from fresh samples. Therefore, the morphological characteristics of H. elaeidis were not compared with Ceratocladium, Circinotrichum, Gyrothrix, and Idriella, as they only had asexual morphs found in nature. Hence, the morphological features of H. elaeidis were only compared with Neoanthostomella, Virgaria, and Xenoanthostomella, as they have sexual morphs.
Key to genera related to Anthostomella-like genera | |
1. Hyaline ascospores | Alloanthostomella |
1. Brown ascospores | 2 |
2. Asci with a J- apical ring | 3 |
2. Asci with or without J+ apical ring | 5 |
3. Ascospores with or without germ slit | 4 |
3. Ascospores with germ slit | Xenoanthostomella |
4. Ascospores with a germ slit and the length less than spore length with a mucilaginous cap at the apex | Haploanthostomella |
4. Ascospores with or without germ slit, with mucilaginous sheath | Neoanthostomella |
5. Asci with a J+ apical ring, ascospores with germ slit, with or without mucilaginous sheath | 6 |
5. Asci with J+ or J- apical ring, ascospores with or without germ slit (straight or spiral), and also with or without appendages or mucilaginous sheath | Anthostomella |
6. Ascospores with germ slit less than spore length, with or without mucilaginous sheath | 7 |
6. Ascospores with germ slit extending over full length with mucilaginous sheath | Pseudoanthostomella |
7. Ellipsoid ascospores without mucilaginous sheath | Virgaria |
7. Inequilaterally oblong-ellipsoidal ascospores with mucilaginous sheath | Anthostomelloides |
3.1.3. Endocalyx Berk. & Broome, J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 15(1): 84 (1876) [1877]
Index Fungorum number: IF8158; Facesoffungi number: FoF09175
Saprobic on various plants. Colonies on host plant, pustules nearly flat or raised, circular, discolored, dark brown to black, at last bursting, the conidiomata developing. Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Conidiomata scattered, erect, cupulate to cylindrical; peridial hyphae enclosing the inner conidial mass, nonsporiferous, brown to yellowish brown; some species consisting of two parts of conidioma: (1) a basal cylinder covering a central column, rough-walled, carbonaceous, composed of black hyphae which are sometimes branched and are adherent to one another; (2) a slender central column, synnematous, expanding radially apically, high, enclosed by the peridial hyphae which are nonsporiferous, orange-yellow to lemon-yellow. Peridial wall thick, comprising dark brown, thick-walled cells of textura angularis. Conidiophores thread-like, septate, with or without short pegs bearing the conidia, meristematic at the base, colorless basally and gradually turning brown apically, 1–2 µm wide; peridium thick, comprising dark brown, thick-walled cells of textura angularis. Conidiogenous cells holoblastic, integrated, determinate. Conidia solitary, unicellular, flattened, round, oval or slightly polygonal in face view, at first pale, dark brown to fuscous black at maturity, with or without guttules, often with a longitudinal hyaline straight germ slit extending the full-length (adapted from [99,100,101]).
Type species: Endocalyx thwaitesii Berk. & Broome
Notes: Endocalyx is a coelomycetous genus in Cainiaceae with E. cinctus collected from Japan E. metroxyli sp. nov. collected from Thailand. Phylogenetic analyses of a single dataset of ITS (supporting information section) and phylogenetic analyses of a combined dataset of ITS, LSU, rpb2, and tub2 regions (Figure 1) confirm the placement of Endocalyx within Cainiaceae. ITS analyses showed that Endocalyx is closely related to Amphibambusa and Atrotorquata (supporting information section), while Figure 1 shows that Endocalyx formed a basal clade to other cainiaceous genera (Alishanica, Amphibambusa, Arecophila, Atrotorquata, Cainia, Longiappendispora, and Seynesia) with high bootstrap support. Morphologically, Endocalyx has been revised and described only as an asexual morph of the genus [100,101], while all genera in Cainiaceae have been described in their sexual morphs, except the type genus Cainia, for which both asexual and sexual morphs have been described. We could not compare the morphology of Endocalyx to Arecophila, Seynesia, and Amphibambusa (sister species in Figure 1). Therefore, Cainia was used for morphological comparisons; Endocalyx differs from Cainia in having erect conidiomata and also the ostiole opening surrounded by yellow hyphae, ellipsoid-globose conidia, unicellular with brown to dark brown color, and a germ slit. Cainia has immersed conidiomata, conidiogenous cells with one to three phialides, and elongate fusiform conidia, unicellular or septate, hyaline, with pointed ends [100,101,102].
Recently, Longiappendispora was introduced under Cainiaceae, with seven genera in total included in the family by Mapook et al. [11]. In our study, detailed molecular analyses were done for Endocalyx and its placement in Cainiaceae (Xyalriales) was confirmed. Previously, Endocalyx was classified in Apiosporaceae (Xylariales, Sordariomycetes) based on morphological evidence. As the first detailed molecular data of Endocalyx cinctus have been made available from a Japan laboratory [32], their current placement is supported (Figure 1). However, there are no recent publications referring to the molecular data of this genus yet. Thus, in this study, we present the placement of Endocalyx based on multigene phylogenetic analyses with recent sequence data from the Japan collection as well as the Thailand collection. In addition, we accept eight genera in Cainiaceae (Alishanica, Amphibambusa, Arecophila, Atrotorquata, Cainia, Endocalyx, Longiappendispora, and Seynesia), and seven species by including our new species in the genus Endocalyx (Table 2). In addition, we provide a key for the members of Cainiaceae.
3.1.4. Endocalyx metroxyli Konta & K.D. Hyde. sp. nov.
Index Fungorum number: IF558116, Facesoffungi number: FoF09176 (Figure 3)
Etymology: Refers to the name of the host genus, Metroxylon.
Holotype: MFLU 15-1454.
Saprobic on dead petiole of Metroxylon sagu. Colonies on host plant, pustules. Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Conidiomata 340–660 μm wide, in vertical section 495–820 × 325–485 µm, acervulus, solitary, semi-immersed to immersed in the host epidermis, beneath a clypeus, visible as slightly raised and blackened, black, carbonaceous, fragile, with an ostiolar canal. Ostiolar opening surrounded by a yellow margin. Peridial wall 34–80 μm wide, thick, comprising dark brown cells of textura angularis. Conidiomata not observed with a basal cylinder covering a central column or a slender central column in our collection. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cell, hyaline to pale-brown, unbranched, smooth. Conidia 13–16 × 7–10 µm (x¯ = 13 × 10 µm, n = 30), unicellular, ellipsoid-globose, brown to dark brown, with short pegs bearing conidia, with germ slit, smooth-walled.
Culture characteristics: Colonies on MEA, at first white, raised, effuse, velvety to hairy, circular, smooth at the margin, white from above, pale-brown from below.
Material examined: Thailand, Krabi Province, on dead petiole of Metroxylon sagu Rottb. on the ground (Arecaceae), 8 December 2014, Sirinapa Konta KBR04h2 (MFLU 15-1454, holotype); ex-type living culture, MFLUCC 15-0723A; ibid. MFLUCC 15-0723B, MFLUCC 15-0723C.
Additional sequence data: SSU: MT929310, MT929311, tef1-α: MT928152, MT928153.
Notes: Endocalyx metroxyli is phylogenetically well supported and is placed in Cainiaceae (Figure 1). Endocalyx metroxyli is closely related to E. cinctus with high bootstrap support but is distinct in morphological characteristics. A BLAST search of E. metroxyli ITS sequence shows 83.10% similarity with Requienella seminuda (CBS 140502) (CPC 37069), LSU sequence shows 96.14% similarity with Entosordaria quercina (RQ), tub2 sequence shows 88.94% similarity with Daldinia dennisii var. dennisii, SSU sequence shows 97.92% similarity with Xenoanthostomella chromolaenae (MFLUCC 17-1484), and tef1-α sequence shows 89.39% similarity with Barrmaelia macrospor (BM).
Endocalyx metroxyli is morphologically similar to E. melanoxanthus. However, Endocalyx metroxyli does not have erect conidiomata developing from the pustules, as was mentioned by Petch [100], Okada and Tubaki [101], and Vitoria et al. [102,131]. In this study, we found only a black raised pustule structure with ostiole surrounded by a yellow hyphae ring, and hyaline conidiophore, unicellular, dark brown conidia with a longitudinal germ slit. Endocalyx melanoxanthus was collected and described from palm hosts (Arecaceae), and a few collections were collected from other host plants (Table 2). According to Species Fungorum [134], E. melanoxanthus var. Grossus (G. Okada & Tubaki) and E. melanoxanthus var. melanoxanthus (Berk. & Broome) are considered as E. melanoxanthus, even though they have several different characteristics.
Endocalyx metroxyli is morphologically similar to E. melanoxanthus var. melanoxanthus, in having black raised pustules surrounded by yellow hyphae and smooth-walled conidia with no significant size differences [100,101,102]. However, our new taxon lacks cupulate or cylindrical conidiomata [101,102]. On the other hand, E. metroxyli differs from E. melanoxanthus var. grossus by lacking the production of ornamented conidia [100,101].
Keys to genera of Cainiaceae | |
1. Asexual morph | |
1.1 Coelomycetous; 1–3 phialides conidiogenous cells, and elongate fusiform conidia with unicellular or septate, with pointed ends | Cainia |
1.1 Coelomycetous; conidiomata with ostiolar opening surrounded by yellow, with unicellular conidia, ellipsoid-globose, pale to dark brown to black, with a straight germ slit extending the full-length | Endocalyx |
2. Sexual morph | |
2.1 Cylindrical-clavate asci, ascospores with 1-septate | (2.2) |
2.1 Cylindrical, or cylindrical to elongate cylindrical asci, ascospores with 1-septate | (2.3) |
2.2 Ellipsoidal ascospores, with brown, and sheath | Cainia |
2.2 Ellipsoidal to fusiform ascospores, with brown, and sheath | Atrotorquata |
2.3 Ellipsoid to broadly fusiform ascospores, longitudinal striations, bristle-like polar appendages from both ends, without a gelatinous sheath | Longiappendispora |
2.3 Fusiform to broad-fusiform ascospores with pointed at both ends, striation wall, and sheath | Amphibambusa |
2.3 Ellipsoidal or oblong ascospores | (2.4) |
2.4 Oblong ascospores with cap-like appendage, germ slits | Seynesia |
2.4 Ellipsoidal ascospores | (2.5) |
2.5 Ascospores with striation wall, brown, and sheath | Alishanica |
2.5 Ascospores with striate or verrucose wall, and subhyaline to brown | Arecophila |
4. Discussion
Based on phylogeny and morphological characteristics, the new monotypic genus Haploanthostomella (type species: Haploanthostomella elaeidis) and the new species Endocalyx metroxyli have been established. The former new species was isolated from a dead rachis of Elaeis guineensis, and the latter from a dead petiole of Metroxylon sagu (Arecaceae) in Thailand. Phylogenetic analyses of combined datasets together with morphological characteristics revealed that Haploanthostomella belongs to Xylariales incertae sedis, while Endocalyx belongs to the Cainiaceae (Xylariales).
Based on morphological features, Endocalyx was assigned to Apiosporaceae (Amphisphaeriales, Sordariomycetes), together with four other genera, viz. Appendicospora, Arthrinium, Dictyoarthrinium, and Nigrospora [3,8]. Later, Dictyoarthrinium was transferred to Didymosphaeriaceae (Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes) [135]. According to our phylogenetic analyses (Figure 1), Arthrinium and Nigrospora should be accepted under the Apiosporaceae, while Appendicospora did not clade to this family (supporting information section), and Endocalyx fits well within the Cainiaceae.
Interestingly, four out of seven species in the genus Endocalyx (E. melanoxanthus, E. cinctus, E. indumentum, and E. thwaitesii) were collected from palm hosts (Table 2). Endocalyx metroxyli is similar to other species by having dark brown conidia with a full-length germ slit, it but differs from other species by not having conidiomata produced from the pustulate and no thread-like structure of conidiophores. Morphological characteristics of species in the genus are mostly flat or raised pustules, capsule or slender conidiomata with or without branches at the apex, and brown to dark brown conidia with smooth walls (E. amarkantakensis, E. collantesis, E. indumentum, E. melanoxanthus, E. melanoxanthus var. melanoxanthus), while some species are verrucose-walled (E. cinctus, E. indumentum, E. melanoxanthus var. grossus, E. thwaitesii). We referred to previous publications for morphological comparisons to the taxa in this study, as we did not observe all holotype specimens [100,101,102].
According to the literature, there are also strains derived from another two species and two varieties. Excluding E. cinctus, no sequence data are available for generic types of Endocalyx and other species, and their morphology and host substrates are closely related to our novel taxon. Endocalyx species have been reported in several countries, especially in tropical and subtropical regions. Furthermore, palm trees (Arecaceae) have most commonly been reported as the host, while several species have been presented from other hosts (Table 2).
The phylogenetic placement of many groups within the Xylariales remains unclear (e.g., Anthostomelloides, Calceomyces, Circinotrichum, Fasciatispora (only F. petrakii), Gyrothyrix, Melanographium, Neoanthostomella, Pseudoanthostomella, and Xenoanthostomella, Figure 1). Thus, it is necessary to collect and analyze more fungal specimens from Xylariales using multigene phylogeny (with protein coding genes) and morphology to resolve their taxonomical placement and delimitation.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, S.K.; Formal analysis, S.K.; Funding acquisition, K.D.H. and S.T.; Methodology, S.K.; Resources, S.C.K., J.X. and S.T.; Supervision, K.D.H. and P.D.E.; Writing—original draft, S.K., S.C.K., M.C.S., S.T.A., L.A.P.D. and S.T.; Writing—review and editing, K.D.H., S.C.K., S.T. and S.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
Saowaluck Tibpromma would like to thank the International Postdoctoral Exchange Fellowship Program (number Y9180822S1), CAS President’s International Fellowship Initiative (PIFI) (number 2020PC0009), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, and the Yunnan Human Resources, and Social Security Department Foundation for funding her postdoctoral research. Samantha C. Kaunarathna thanks CAS President’s International Fellowship Initiative (PIFI) for funding his postdoctoral research (No. 2018PC0006) and the National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) for funding this work under the project code 31851110759. Kevin D. Hyde thanks the Thailand Research Funds for the grant “Impact of Climate Change on Fungal Diversity and Biogeography in the Greater Mekong Subregion (RDG6130001)”. This work was partly supported by Chiang Mai University.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Acknowledgments
Sirinapa Konta is grateful to Paul Kirk, Shaun Pennycook, Saranyaphat Boonmee, and Sirilak Radbouchoom for their valuable suggestions and help.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures and Tables
Figure 1. Maximum likelihood majority rule consensus tree for the analyses of selected Xylariomycetidae isolates based on a dataset of combined ITS, LSU, rpb2, and tub2 nucleotide sequence. Bootstrap support values for maximum likelihood (ML) equal to or higher than 50% are given above each branch. Bayesian posterior probabilities (BYPP) equal to or greater than 0.90 are given at the nodes. Novel taxa are in blue bold and ex-type strains are in black bold. The tree is rooted to Delonicicolaceae and Leptosilliaceae (Delonicicolales). The asterisks represent unstable species.
Figure 2. Haploanthostomella elaeidis (MFLU 20-0522, holotype). (A) Substrate. (B,C) Appearance of ascomata on the host surface. (D) Sections of ascomata. (E) Peridium. (F) Hamathecium. (G) Septa of paraphyses show in red arrows. (H,I–K) Asci. (L) J- apical ring in Melzer’s reagent. (M,N,P–R) Ascospores with mucilaginous cap (red arrows in M, Q, R) and germ slit (red arrows in P). (O) An ascospore with verrucose wall. Scale bars: B = 1000 μm, C = 200 μm, D = 500 μm, E, G, L = 20 μm, F, H–K = 50 μm, M–P = 10 μm, Q–R = 5 μm.
Figure 3. Endocalyx metroxyli (MFLU 15-1454, holotype). (A) Forest in Krabi Province. (B) Palm samples. (C–E) Appearance of conidiomata on host. (F) Vertical cut of a conidioma. (G–H) Vertical section of a conidioma. (I) Section of peridium. (J) Group of conidia. (K) Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cell with conidium. (L–S) Conidia (P–R, Conidia with conidiogenous cells). (T) Germ slit (red arrow). (U) Germinated conidia. (V) Colonies on MEA media. Scale bars: B = 2 cm, C = 500 μm, D–H = 200 μm, I, J = 20 μm, L–T = 5 μm, U = 10 μm.
Names, strain numbers and corresponding GenBank accession numbers of the taxa used in phylogenetic analyses, the ex-type strains are in bold.
Order | Family | Species | Strain No. | GenBank Accession No. | References | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITS | LSU | rpb2 | tub2 | |||||
Amphisphaeriales | Apiosporaceae | Arthrinium balearicum | AP24118 | MK014869 | MK014836 | - | MK017946 | [21] |
Amphisphaeriales | Apiosporaceae | Arthrinium caricicola | CBS 145127 | MK014871 | MK014838 | - | MK017948 | [21] |
Amphisphaeriales | Apiosporaceae | Arthrinium hydei | CBS 114990 | KF144890 | KF144936 | - | KF144982 | [22] |
Amphisphaeriales | Apiosporaceae | Arthrinium phragmitis | CBS 135458 | KF144909 | KF144956 | - | KF145001 | [22] |
Amphisphaeriales | Apiosporaceae | Arthrinium pseudospegazzinii | CBS 102052 | KF144911 | KF144958 | - | KF145002 | [22] |
Amphisphaeriales | Apiosporaceae | Nigrospora aurantiaca | CGMCC 3.18130 | NR_153477 | NG_069394 | - | KY019465 | [23] |
Amphisphaeriales | Apiosporaceae | Nigrospora brasiliensis | CMM 1214 | KY569629 | - | - | MK720816 | [24] |
Amphisphaeriales | Apiosporaceae | Nigrospora zimmermanii | CBS 290.62 | KY385309 | - | KY806276 | KY385317 | [23] |
Amphisphaeriales | Beltraniaceae | Beltrania rhombica | CBS 123.58 = IMI 072432 | MH553990 | MH554209 | MH554899 | MH704631 | [25] |
Amphisphaeriales | Beltraniaceae | Beltraniella endiandrae | CBS 137976 | KJ869128 | KJ869185 | - | - | [26] |
Amphisphaeriales | Beltraniaceae | Beltraniopsis neolitseae | CBS 137974 | KJ869126 | KJ869183 | - | - | [26] |
Amphisphaeriales | Beltraniaceae | Arecophila bambusae | HKUCC 4794 | - | AF452038 | - | - | [27] |
Xylariales | Cainiaceae | Alishanica miscanthii | FU31025 | MK503821 | MK503827 | - | - | [3] |
Xylariales | Cainiaceae | Amphibambusa bambusicola | MFLUCC 11-0617 | KP744433 | KP744474 | - | - | [28] |
Xylariales | Cainiaceae | Atrotorquata lineata | HKUCC 3263 | AF009807 | - | - | - | Unpublished |
Xylariales | Cainiaceae | Cainia anthoxanthis | MFLUCC 15-0539 | KR092787 | KR092777 | - | - | [5] |
Xylariales | Cainiaceae | Cainia desmazieri | CAI | KT949896 | KT949896 | - | - | [29] |
Xylariales | Cainiaceae | Cainia globosa | MFLUCC 13-0663 | KX822127 | KX822123 | - | - | [30] |
Xylariales | Cainiaceae | Cainia graminis | CBS 136.62 | KR092793 | AF431949 | - | - | [5,31] |
Xylariales | Cainiaceae | Longiappendispora chromolaenae | MFLUCC 17-1485 | MT214370 | MT214464 | - | - | [11] |
Xylariales | Cainiaceae | Endocalyx cinctus | JCM 7946 | LC228648 | LC228704 | - | - | [32] |
Xylariales | Cainiaceae | Endocalyx metroxyli | MFLUCC 15-0723A | MT929162 | MT929313 | - | - | This study |
Xylariales | Cainiaceae | Endocalyx metroxyli | MFLUCC 15-0723B | MT929163 | MT929314 | - | MT928155 | This study |
Xylariales | Cainiaceae | Endocalyx metroxyli | MFLUCC 15-0723C | - | MT929315 | - | - | This study |
Xylariales | Cainiaceae | Seynesia erumpens | SMH 1291 | - | AF279410 | - | - | [33] |
Xylariales | Clypeosphaeriaceae | Clypeosphaeria mamillana | CBS 140735 | KT949897 | KT949897 | MF489001 | MH704637 | [29,34] |
Xylariales | Coniocessiaceae | Coniocessia anandra | Co108 | GU553338 | GU553349 | - | - | [35] |
Xylariales | Coniocessiaceae | Coniocessia cruciformis | Co116 | GU553336 | GU553347 | - | - | [35] |
Xylariales | Coniocessiaceae | Coniocessia maxima | Co117 | GU553332 | GU553344 | - | - | [35] |
Xylariales | Coniocessiaceae | Coniocessia minima | Co111 | GU553334 | GU553345 | - | - | [35] |
Xylariales | Coniocessiaceae | Coniocessia nodulisporioides | CBS 281.77T | - | AJ875224 | - | - | [36] |
Xylariales | Coniocessiaceae | Paraxylaria rosacearum | TASM 6132 | MG828941 | MG829050 | - | - | [37] |
Xylariales | Diatrypaceae | Allocryptovalsa polyspora | MFLUCC 17-0364 | MF959500 | MF959503 | - | MG334556 | [38] |
Xylariales | Diatrypaceae | Allodiatrype arengae | MFLUCC 15-0713 | MN308411 | MN308402 | MN542886 | MN340297 | [39] |
Xylariales | Diatrypaceae | Cryptovalsa rabenhorstii | CreI = CBS 125574 | KC774567 | KC774567 | - | - | [40] |
Xylariales | Diatrypaceae | Diatrype disciformis | CBS 197.49 | - | DQ470964 | DQ470915 | - | [41] |
Xylariales | Diatrypaceae | Diatrypella verruciformis | UCROK1467 | JX144793 | - | - | JX174093 | [42] |
Xylariales | Diatrypaceae | Eutypa lata | CBS 208.87 | DQ006927 | MH873755 | - | DQ006969 | [43,44] |
Xylariales | Diatrypaceae | Eutypella caricae | EL5C | AJ302460 | - | - | - | [45] |
Xylariales | Diatrypaceae | Halodiatrype salinicola | MFLUCC 15-1277 | KX573915 | - | - | KX573932 | [46] |
Xylariales | Diatrypaceae | Monosporascus cannonballus | CMM3646 | JX971617 | - | - | - | Unpublished |
Xylariales | Diatrypaceae | Neoeutypella baoshanensis | EL51C, CBS 274.87 | AJ302460 | - | - | - | [45] |
Xylariales | Diatrypaceae | Pedumispora rhizophorae | BCC44877 | KJ888853 | KJ888850 | - | - | [47] |
Xylariales | Diatrypaceae | Peroneutypa longiasca | MFLUCC 17-0371 | MF959502 | MF959505 | - | MG334558 | [38] |
Xylariales | Fasciatisporaceae | Fasciatispora arengae | MFLUCC 15-0326a | MK120275 | MK120300 | MK890794 | MK890793 | [48] |
Xylariales | Fasciatisporaceae | Fasciatispora calami | MFLUCC 15-0294 | - | MF459055 | - | MF459056 | [49] |
Xylariales | Fasciatisporaceae | Fasciatispora cocoes | MFLUCC 18-1445 | MN482680 | MN482675 | MN481517 | MN505154 | [13] |
Xylariales | Fasciatisporaceae | Fasciatispora nypae | MFLUCC 11-0382 | - | KP744484 | - | - | [28] |
Xylariales | Fasciatisporaceae | Fasciatispora petrakii | - | AY083828 | - | - | Unpublished | |
Xylariales | Graphostromataceae | Biscogniauxia nummularia | MUCL 51395 | KY610382 | KY610427 | KY624236 | KX271241 | [50] |
Xylariales | Graphostromataceae | Camillea obularia | ATCC 28093 | KY610384 | KY610429 | KY624238 | KX271243 | [50] |
Xylariales | Graphostromataceae | Graphostroma platystomum | CBS 270.87 | JX658535 | DQ836906 | KY624296 | HG934108 | [50,51,52,53] |
Xylariales | Graphostromataceae | Obolarina dryophila | MUCL 49882 | GQ428316 | GQ428316 | KY624284 | GQ428322 | [50,54] |
Xylariales | Hansfordiaceae | Hansfordia pulvinate | CBS 194.56 | MK442585 | MH869122 | KU684307 | - | [24] |
Xylariales | Hansfordiaceae | Hansfordia pulvinate | CBS 144422 | MK442587 | MK442527 | - | - | [24] |
Xylariales | Hypoxylaceae | Annulohypoxylon truncatum | CBS 140778 | KY610419 | KY610419 | KY624277 | KX376352 | [50,55] |
Xylariales | Hypoxylaceae | Anthocanalis sparti | MFLUCC 14-0010 | KP297394 | KP340536 | KP340522 | KP406605 | [54] |
Xylariales | Hypoxylaceae | Anthostoma decipiens | CD = CBS 133221 | KC774565 | KC774565 | - | - | [40] |
Xylariales | Hypoxylaceae | Daldinia concentrica | CBS 113277 | AY616683 | KY610434 | KY624243 | KC977274 | [50,56,57] |
Xylariales | Hypoxylaceae | Durotheca depressa | BCC28073 | - | - | - | GQ160492 | [58] |
Xylariales | Hypoxylaceae | Entonaema liquescens | ATCC 46302 | KY610389 | KY610443 | KY624253 | KX271248 | [50] |
Xylariales | Hypoxylaceae | Hypomontagnella monticulosa | MUCL 54604 | KY610404 | KY610487 | KY624305 | KX271273 | [50] |
Xylariales | Hypoxylaceae | Hypoxylon fragiforme | MUCL 51264 | KC477229 | KM186295 | KM186296 | KX271282 | [50,59,60] |
Xylariales | Hypoxylaceae | Jackrogersella multiformis | CBS 119016 | KC477234 | KY610473 | KY624290 | KX271262 | [50,55,57] |
Xylariales | Hypoxylaceae | Pyrenomyxa morganii | CBS 116990T | AM749920 | - | - | - | [61] |
Xylariales | Hypoxylaceae | Pyrenomyxa picea | ILLS 58257 | - | EF562506 | - | - | [62] |
Xylariales | Hypoxylaceae | Pyrenopolyporus hunteri | MUCL 52673 | KY610421 | KY610472 | KY624309 | KU159530 | [50,55] |
Xylariales | Hypoxylaceae | Rhopalostroma indicum | CBS 113035 | MH862909 | MH874483 | - | - | [44] |
Xylariales | Hypoxylaceae | Thamnomyces dendroidea | CBS 123578 | FN428831 | KY610467 | KY624232 | KY624313 | [50,63] |
Xylariales | Hypoxylaceae | Thuemenella cubispora | CBS 119807 | JX658531 | EF562508 | - | - | [62] |
Xylariales | Hypoxylaceae | Phylacia sagrana | CBS 119992 | AM749919 | - | - | - | [61] |
Xylariales | Hypoxylaceae | Pyrenopolyporus symphyon | TBRC:8873 | MH938529 | MH938538 | MK165428 | MK165419 | [64] |
Xylariales | Induratiaceae | Emarcea castanopsidicola | CBS 117105 | MK762710 | MK762717 | MK791285 | MK776962 | [64] |
Xylariales | Induratiaceae | Emarcea eucalyptigena | CBS 139908 | MK762711 | MK762718 | MK791286 | MK776963 | [64] |
Xylariales | Induratiaceae | Induratia fengyangensis | CGMCC 2862 | HM034856 | HM034859 | HM034849 | HM034843 | [65] |
Xylariales | Induratiaceae | Induratia thailandica | MFLUCC 17-2669 | MK762707 | MK762714 | MK791283 | MK776960 | [64] |
Xylariales | Lopadostomataceae | Creosphaeria sassafras | STMA 14087 | KY610411 | KY610468 | KY624265 | KX271258 | [50] |
Xylariales | Lopadostomataceae | Lopadostoma turgidum | CBS 133207 | KC774618 | KC774618 | KC774563 | MF489024 | [29,40] |
Xylariales | Microdochiaceae | Idriella lunata | MUCL 4103 | KC775734 | KC775709 | - | - | [66] |
Xylariales | Microdochiaceae | Idriella lunata | CBS 204.56 | KP859044 | KP858981 | - | - | [67] |
Xylariales | Microdochiaceae | Microdochium phragmitis | CBS 423.78 | KP859012 | KP858948 | KP859121 | KP859076 | [67] |
Xylariales | Polystigmataceae | Polystigma fulvum | MFLU 18-0261 | MK429738 | MK429727 | - | - | [68] |
Xylariales | Polystigmataceae | Polystigma rubrum | MFLU 15-3091 | KY594023 | MF981079 | - | - | [68] |
Xylariales | Requienellaceae | Acrocordiella occulta | RS9 | KT949893 | KT949893 | - | - | [29] |
Xylariales | Requienellaceae | Acrocordiella omanensis | SQUCC 15091 | MG584568 | MG584570 | - | - | [69] |
Xylariales | Requienellaceae | Requienella fraxini | RS2 | KT949909 | KT949909 | - | - | [29] |
Xylariales | Requienellaceae | Requienella seminuda | RS12 = CBS 140502 | KT949912 | KT949912 | MK523300 | - | [29,64] |
Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Abieticola koreana | EML-F0010-1 | JN977612 | JQ014618 | KP792128 | KP792126 | [70] |
Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Amphirosellinia nigrospora | HAST 91092308 | GU322457 | - | GQ848340 | GQ495951 | [71] |
Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Anthostomella formosa | MFLUCC 14-0170 | KP297403 | KP340544 | KP340531 | KP406614 | [59] |
Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Anthostomella helicofissa | MFLUCC 14-0173 | KP297406 | KP340547 | KP340534 | KP406617 | [59] |
Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Anthostomella obesa | MFLUCC 14-0171 | KP297405 | KP340546 | KP340533 | KP406616 | [59] |
Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Anthostomella pseudobambusicola | MFLUCC 15-0192 | KU940153 | KU863141 | - | - | [72] |
Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Anthostomelloides brabeji | CBS 110128 | EU552098 | EU552098 | - | - | [73] |
Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Anthostomelloides forlicesenica | MFLUCC 14-0558 | KP297397 | KP340539 | - | KP406608 | [66] |
Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Anthostomelloides krabiensis | MFLUCC 15-0678 | KX305927 | KX305928 | KX305929 | - | [30] |
Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Anthostomelloides leucospermi | CBS:110126 | EU552100 | - | - | - | [73] |
Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Anthostomelloides proteae | CBS 110127 | EU552101 | - | - | - | [73] |
Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Astrocystis mirabilis | 94070803 HAST | GU322448 | - | GQ844835 | GQ495941 | [71] |
Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Brunneiperidium gracilentum | MFLUCC 14-0011 Ex-type | KP297400 | KP340542 | KP340528 | KP406611 | [66] |
Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Collodiscula japonica | CBS 124266 | JF440974 | JF440974 | KY624273 | KY624316 | [50,74] |
Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Coniolariella gamsii | Co27IRAN 842C, CBS114379 (T) | GU553325 | GU553329 | - | - | [35] |
Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Entalbostroma erumpens | ICMP 21152 | KX258206 | - | KX258204 | KX258205 | [75] |
Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Entoleuca mammata | J.D.R. 100 | GU300072 | - | GQ844782 | GQ470230 | [71] |
Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Euepixylon sphaeriostomum | J.D.R. 261 | GU292821 | - | GQ844774 | GQ470224 | [71] |
Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Halorosellinia oceanica | SGLAf82 | EU715635 | - | - | - | [76] |
Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Hypocopra rostrata | NRRL 66178 | KM067909 | - | - | - | [77] |
Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Hypocreodendron sanguineum | J.D.R. 169 | GU322433 | - | GQ844819 | GQ487710 | [71] |
Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Kretzschmaria clavus | YMJ 114 | EF026126 | - | GQ844789 | EF025611 | [71,78] |
Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Linosporopsis ischnotheca | LIF1 = CBS 145761 | MN818952 | MN818952 | MN820708 | MN820715 | [79] |
Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Lunatiannulus irregularis | MFLUCC 14-0014 | KP297398 | KP340540 | KP340526 | KP406609 | [57] |
Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Nemania serpens | CBS 679.86 | KU683765 | - | KU684284 | KU684188 | [80] |
Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Neoxylaria arengae | MFLUCC 15-0292 | MT496747 | - | MT502418 | - | [81] |
Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Podosordaria mexicana | WSP 176 | GU324762 | - | GQ853039 | GQ844840 | [71] |
Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Poronia punctata | CBS 656.78 | KT281904 | KY610496 | KY624278 | KX271281 | [5,50] |
Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Rosellinia aquila | MUCL 51703 | KY610392 | KY610460 | KY624285 | KX271253 | [50] |
Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Rostrohypoxylon terebratum | CBS 119137 | DQ631943 | DQ840069 | DQ631954 | DQ840097 | [82,83] |
Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Ruwenzoria pseudoannulata | MUCL 51394 | KY610406 | KY610494 | KY624286 | KX271278 | [50] |
Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Sarcoxylon compunctum | CBS 359.61 | KT281903 | KY610462 | KY624230 | KX271255 | [5,50] |
Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Stilbohypoxylon elaeicola | Y.M.J. 173 | EF026148 | - | GQ844826 | EF025616 | [71] |
Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Stilbohypoxylon elaeidis | MFLUCC 15-0295a | MT496745 | MT496755 | MT502416 | MT502420 | [81] |
Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Stilbohypoxylon quisquiliarum | Y.M.J. 172 | EF026119 | - | GQ853020 | EF025605 | [71] |
Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Vamsapriya bambusicola | MFLUCC 11-0477 | KM462835 | KM462836 | KM462834 | KM462833 | [84] |
Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Vamsapriya breviconidiophora | MFLUCC 14-0436 | MF621584 | MF621588 | - | - | [39] |
Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Vamsapriya indica | MFLUCC 12-0544 | KM462839 | KM462840 | KM462841 | KM462838 | [84] |
Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Vamsapriya khunkonensis | MFLUCC 11-0475 | KM462830 | KM462831 | KM462829 | KM462828 | [84] |
Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Vamsapriya yunnana | KUMCC 18-0008 | MG833874 | MG833873 | MG833875 | - | [85] |
Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Virgaria boninensis | JCM 18624 | AB740956 | AB740960 | - | - | [86] |
Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Virgaria nigra | CBS 128006 | MH864744 | MH876180 | - | - | [44] |
Xylariales | Xylariaceae | Xylaria hypoxylon | CBS 122620 | KY610407 | KY610495 | KY624231 | KX271279 | [50,87] |
Sordariomycetes genera |
Xylariales genera incertae sedis | Melanographium phoenicis | MFLUCC 18-1481 | MN482677 | MN482678 | - | - | [13] |
Sordariomycetes genera |
Xylariales genera incertae sedis | Ceratocladium microspermum | CBS126092 | MH864077 | MH875534 | - | - | [44] |
Xylariales | Xylariales genera incertae sedis | Ascotricha chartarum | CBS 234.97 | KF893284 | - | - | KF893271 | [88] |
Xylariales | Xylariales genera incertae sedis | Ascotricha longipila | OUCMBI110118 (T) | KC503896 | - | - | KF893265 | [88] |
Xylariales | Xylariales genera incertae sedis | Ascotricha lusitanica | CBS 462.70 (IT) | KF893289 | - | - | KF893275 | [88] |
Xylariales | Xylariales genera incertae sedis | Ascotricha parvispora | OUCMBI110001 (T) | JX014298 | - | - | KF893267 | [88] |
Xylariales | Xylariales genera incertae sedis | Ascotricha sinuosa | OUCMBI101190 (T) | JX014299 | - | - | KF893266 | [88] |
Xylariales | Xylariales genera incertae sedis | Alloanthostomella rubicola | MFLUCC 14-0175 | KP297407 | KP340548 | KP340535 | KP406618 | [89] |
Xylariales | Xylariales genera incertae sedis | Circinotrichum cycadis | CPC 17285 | KJ869121 | KJ869178 | - | - | [26] |
Xylariales | Xylariales genera incertae sedis | Circinotrichum maculiforme | CPC 24566 | KR611874 | KR611895 | - | - | [90] |
Xylariales | Xylariales genera incertae sedis | Circinotrichum papakurae | CBS 101373 | KR611876 | KR611897 | - | - | [90] |
Xylariales | Xylariales genera incertae sedis | Circinotrichum sinense | KY994106 | KY994107 | - | - | [91] | |
Xylariales | Xylariales genera incertae sedis | Gyrothrix eucalypti | CPC 36066 | MN562109 | MN567617 | - | - | [92] |
Xylariales | Xylariales genera incertae sedis | Gyrothrix inops | BE108 | KC775746 | KC775721 | - | - | [66] |
Xylariales | Xylariales genera incertae sedis | Gyrothrix oleae | CPC 37069 | MN562136 | MN567643 | - | - | [92] |
Xylariales | Xylariales genera incertae sedis | Gyrothrix ramosa | MUCL54061 | KC775747 | KC775722 | - | - | [66] |
Xylariales | Xylariales genera incertae sedis | Haploanthostomella elaeidis | MFLU 20-0522 | MT929161 | MT929312 | MT928154 | - | This study |
Xylariales | Xylariales genera incertae sedis | Neoanthostomella pseudostromatica | MFLUCC 11-0610 | KU940158 | KU863146 | - | - | [72] |
Xylariales | Xylariales genera incertae sedis | Neoanthostomella viticola | MFLUCC 16-0243 | KX505957 | KX505958 | KX789496 | KX789495 | [89] |
Xylariales | Xylariales genera incertae sedis | Pseudoanthostomella conorum | CBS 119333 | EU552099 | - | - | - | [73] |
Xylariales | Xylariales genera incertae sedis | Pseudoanthostomella delitescens | MFLUCC 16-0477 | KX533451 | KX533452 | KX789491 | KX789490 | [89] |
Xylariales | Xylariales genera incertae sedis | Pseudoanthostomella pini-nigrae | MFLUCC 16-0478 | KX533453 | KX533454 | KX789492 | - | [89] |
Xylariales | Xylariales genera incertae sedis | Pseudoanthostomella sepelibilis | AY908989 | AY875645 | - | - | Unpublished | |
Xylariales | Xylariales genera incertae sedis | Xenoanthostomella chromolaenae | MFLUCC 17-1484 | MN638863 | MN638848 | - | - | [3] |
Xylariales | Zygosporiaceae | Zygosporium oscheoides | MFLUCC 14-0402 | MF621585 | MF621589 | - | - | [93] |
Xylariales | Zygosporiaceae | Zygosporium minus | HKAS99625 | MF621586 | MF621590 | - | - | [93] |
Host and locality information of Endocalyx reported worldwide based on the records of Species Fungorum 2021.
No. | Species | Host | Country | Reference | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eudicots | Monocots | ||||
1 | Endocalyx amarkantakensis | Shorea robusta (Dipterocarpaceae) | India (Holotype) | [103] | |
2 | E. cinctus * | Livistona chinensis var. boninensis (Arecaceae; solitary palm) | Japan | [104] | |
Oncosperma fasciculatum (Arecaceae; clustering, rarely solitary palm) | Japan | [101] | |||
Oncosperma sp. (Arecaceae; clustering, rarely solitary palm) | Sri Lanka |
[100] | |||
Phoenix canariensis (Arecaceae; solitary palm) | Japan | [101] | |||
Phoenix hanceana (Arecaceae; solitary palm) | Hong Kong | [105] | |||
Trachycarpus fortunei (Arecaceae; solitary palm) | Japan | [101] | |||
3 | E. collantesis | Smilax sp. (Smilacaceae) | Cuba (Holotype) | [106] | |
4 | E. indicus | twigs of woody | India (Holotype) | [107] | |
5 | E. indumentum | Livistona chinensis var. boninensis (Arecaceae; solitary palm) | Japan (Holotype) | [101,104] | |
Phoenix canariensis (Arecaceae; solitary palm) | Japan | [104] | |||
6 | E. melanoxanthus | Acrocomia mexicana (Arecaceae) | Mexico | [108] | |
Archontophoenix alexandrae (Arecaceae; solitary palm) | Australia | [109] | |||
Hong Kong | [105,109] | ||||
Malaysia | [109] | ||||
Singapore | [109] | ||||
Arecaceae | Mexico | [108] | |||
Arenga engleri (Arecaceae; clustering palm) | Hong Kong | [105] | |||
Japan | [104] | ||||
Dypsis lutescens (=Chrysalidocarpus lutescens) (Arecaceae; clustering palm) | Japan | [104] | |||
Caryota urens (Arecaceae; solitary palm) | Sri Lanka (Holotype) | [100] | |||
Cocos nucifera (Arecaceae; solitary palm) | Australia | [109] | |||
Ghana | [110] | ||||
Hawaii | [111,112] | ||||
Japan | [104] | ||||
Malaysia | [109,113] | ||||
Papua New Guinea | [114] | ||||
Seychelles | [109] | ||||
Singapore | [109] | ||||
Coffea arabica (Rubiaceae) | Venezuela | [115] | |||
Dracaena fragrans (Asparagaceae) | Cuba | [116] | |||
Venezuela | [115] | ||||
Elaeis guineensis (Arecaceae; solitary palm) | Ghana | [110] | |||
Myanmar | [117] | ||||
Sierra Leone | [113] | ||||
Elaeis sp. (Arecaceae; solitary palm) | Japan | [104] | |||
Licuala longicalycata (Arecaceae; solitary palm) | Thailand | [118] | |||
Livistona chinensis (Arecaceae; solitary palm) | Hong Kong | [105] | |||
Livistona chinensis var. boninensis (Arecaceae; solitary palm) | Japan | [104] | |||
Livistona rotundifolia (Arecaceae; solitary palm) | Taiwan | [119] | |||
Livistona speciosa (Arecaceae; solitary palm) | Myanmar | [117] | |||
Nannorrhops ritchieana (Arecaceae; clustering palm) | Pakistan | [120] | |||
Phoenix canariensis (Arecaceae; solitary palm) | Japan | [104] | |||
Phoenix hanceana (Arecaceae; solitary palm) | Hong Kong | [105,121] | |||
Phoenix reclinata (Arecaceae; solitary palm) | Ghana | [110] | |||
Phoenix roebelenii (Arecaceae; solitary palm) | Japan | [104] | |||
Phoenix roebelenii-senegalensis (Arecaceae; solitary palm) | Japan | [104] | |||
Ravenala madagascariensis (Strelitziaceae) | Japan | [104] | |||
Taiwan | [119] | ||||
Ripogonum scandens (Ripogonaceae) | New Zealand | [122] | |||
Roystonea borinquena (Arecaceae; solitary palm) | USA (Florida) | [123] | |||
Roystonea regia (Arecaceae; solitary palm) | Cuba | [124,125,126,127] | |||
Sabal palmetto (Arecaceae; solitary palm) | USA (Florida) | [128] | |||
Serenoa serrulata (Arecaceae; clustering and solitary palm) | USA (Florida) | [129] | |||
Smilax sp. (Smilacaceae) | USA (Florida) | [128] | |||
Trachycarpus fortunei (Arecaceae; solitary palm) | China | [109] | |||
unknown, palm | Australia | [109] | |||
China | [109] | ||||
Hong Kong | [109] | ||||
Malaysia | [109] | ||||
Seychelles | [109] | ||||
Singapore | [109] | ||||
Wodyetia bifurcata (Arecaceae; solitary palm) | Florida | [123] | |||
E. melanoxanthus |
Trachycarpus fortunei (Arecaceae; solitary palm) | Japan | [101] | ||
E. melanoxanthus |
Acrocomia intumescens (Arecaceae; solitary palm) | Brazil | [102] | ||
Butia yatay (Arecaceae; solitary palm) | Argentina | [130] | |||
Cocos nucifera (Arecaceae; solitary palm) | Ghana | [101] | |||
Euterpe edulis (Arecaceae; solitary, or rarely clustering palm (growing in dense tufts or clumps) and then with few stems) | Argentina | [130] | |||
Brazil | [102] | ||||
Euterpe oleracea (Arecaceae; clustering palm) | Brazil | [102] | |||
Livistona chinensis var. boninensis (Arecaceae; solitary palm) | Japan | [101] | |||
Livistona chinensis var. subglobosa (Arecaceae; solitary palm) | Japan | [101] | |||
Phoenix canariensis (Arecaceae; solitary palm) | Japan | [101] | |||
Phoenix roebelenii (Arecaceae; solitary palm) | Japan | [101] | |||
Satakentia liukiuensis (Arecaceae; solitary palm) | Japan | [101] | |||
Syagrus coronata (Arecaceae; solitary palm) | Brazil | [131] | |||
Syagrus romanzoffiana (Arecaceae; solitary palm) | Argentina | [130] | |||
Trachycarpus fortunei (Arecaceae; solitary palm) | Japan | [101] | |||
Washingtonia robusta (Arecaceae; solitary palm) | Japan | [101] | |||
7 | E. thwaitesii (Type species) | Cissus oreophila (Vitaceae) | Ghana | [132] | |
Cissus sp. (Vitaceae) | Ghana | [133] | |||
Sri Lanka | [133] | ||||
Oncosperma sp. (Arecaceae; clustering, rarely solitary palm) | Ghana | [133] | |||
Sri Lanka (Holotype) | [133] |
* Have molecular data.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2021 by the authors.
Abstract
During our investigation of palm fungi in Thailand, two interesting taxa from Elaeis guineensis and Metroxylon sagu (Arecaceae) were collected. Based on phylogenetic analyses of a combined dataset of ITS, LSU, rpb2, and tub2 nucleotide sequences as well as unique morphological characteristics, we introduce the new genus Haploanthostomella within Xylariales, and a new species Endocalyx metroxyli. Additionally, in our study, the genus Endocalyx is transferred to the family Cainiaceae based on its brown conidia and molecular phylogenetic evidence.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 CAS Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China;
2 Center of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand;
3 School of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand;
4 CAS Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China;
5 CAS Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China;
6 Guangxi Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Conservation, College of Forestry, Guangxi University, Daxuedonglu 100, Nanning 530004, China;
7 Research Center of Microbial Diversity and Sustainable Utilization, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand;