Abstract

The Paris Agreement does not only stipulate to limit the global average temperature increase to well below 2 °C, it also calls for ‘making finance flows consistent with a pathway towards low greenhouse gas emissions’. Consequently, there is an urgent need to understand the implications of climate targets for energy systems and quantify the associated investment requirements in the coming decade. A meaningful analysis must however consider the near-term mitigation requirements to avoid the overshoot of a temperature goal. It must also include the recently observed fast technological progress in key mitigation options. Here, we use a new and unique scenario ensemble that limit peak warming by construction and that stems from seven up-to-date integrated assessment models. This allows us to study the near-term implications of different limits to peak temperature increase under a consistent and up-to-date set of assumptions. We find that ambitious immediate action allows for limiting median warming outcomes to well below 2 °C in all models. By contrast, current nationally determined contributions for 2030 would add around 0.2 °C of peak warming, leading to an unavoidable transgression of 1.5 °C in all models, and 2 °C in some. In contrast to the incremental changes as foreseen by current plans, ambitious peak warming targets require decisive emission cuts until 2030, with the most substantial contribution to decarbonization coming from the power sector. Therefore, investments into low-carbon power generation need to increase beyond current levels to meet the Paris goals, especially for solar and wind technologies and related system enhancements for electricity transmission, distribution and storage. Estimates on absolute investment levels, up-scaling of other low-carbon power generation technologies and investment shares in less ambitious scenarios vary considerably across models. In scenarios limiting peak warming to below 2 °C, while coal is phased out quickly, oil and gas are still being used significantly until 2030, albeit at lower than current levels. This requires continued investments into existing oil and gas infrastructure, but investments into new fields in such scenarios might not be needed. The results show that credible and effective policy action is essential for ensuring efficient allocation of investments aligned with medium-term climate targets.

Details

Title
Energy system developments and investments in the decisive decade for the Paris Agreement goals
Author
Bertram, Christoph 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Riahi, Keywan 2   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Hilaire, Jérôme 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Bosetti, Valentina 3   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Drouet, Laurent 4   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Fricko, Oliver 5   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Malik, Aman 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Larissa Pupo Nogueira 6   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; van der Zwaan, Bob 7   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Bas van Ruijven 5   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Detlef van Vuuren 8   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Weitzel, Matthias 9   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Francesco Dalla Longa 6 ; de Boer, Harmen-Sytze 10 ; Emmerling, Johannes 4   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Fosse, Florian 9   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Fragkiadakis, Kostas 11 ; Harmsen, Mathijs 8   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Keramidas, Kimon 9   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Kishimoto, Paul Natsuo 5   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Kriegler, Elmar 12   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Krey, Volker 5   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Paroussos, Leonidas 11 ; Saygin, Deger 13 ; Vrontisi, Zoi 11 ; Luderer, Gunnar 14   VIAFID ORCID Logo 

 Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Member of the Leibniz Association, Potsdam, Germany 
 International Institute for Advanced Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria; Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria 
 RFF-CMCC European Institute on Economics and the Environment (EIEE), Centro Euro-Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici, Milan, Italy; Bocconi University, Milan, Italy 
 RFF-CMCC European Institute on Economics and the Environment (EIEE), Centro Euro-Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici, Milan, Italy 
 International Institute for Advanced Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria 
 TNO Energy Transition, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 
 TNO Energy Transition, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; John Hopkins University, School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS), Bologna, Italy 
 PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague, The Netherlands; Copernicus Institute for Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands 
 European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Seville, Spain 
10  PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague, The Netherlands 
11  E3 Modelling, Athens, Greece 
12  Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Member of the Leibniz Association, Potsdam, Germany; Universität Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany 
13  SHURA Energy Transition Center, Istanbul, Turkey; Sabanci University, Istanbul, Turkey 
14  Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Member of the Leibniz Association, Potsdam, Germany; Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany 
Publication year
2021
Publication date
Jul 2021
Publisher
IOP Publishing
e-ISSN
17489326
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2546094670
Copyright
© 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.