Clinical phenotype features and genetic etiologies of 38 children with progressive myoclonic epilepsy

Abstract

Background

Progressive myoclonic epilepsy (PME) is a group of neurodegenerative diseases with genetic heterogeneity and phenotypic similarities, and many cases remain unknown of the genetic causes. This study is aim to summarize the clinical features and study the genetic causes of PME patients.

Methods

Sanger sequencing of the target gene, Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) panels of epilepsy, trio-based Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) and detection of cytosine-adenine-guanine (CAG) repeat number were used to investigate the genetic causes of PME patients.

Results

Thirty-eight children with PME whose seizure onset age ranged from 3 months to 12 years were collected from February 2012 to November 2019 in three hospitals in Beijing, China. The seizure types included myoclonic seizures (n = 38), focal seizures (n = 19), generalized tonic-clonie seizure (GTCS) (n = 13), absence seizures (n = 4), atonic seizures (n = 3), epileptic spasms (n = 2) and tonic seizures (n = 1). Twenty-seven cases were sporadic and 11 had family members affected. Established PME-related genes were identified in 30 out of 38 (78.9%) patients who had either recessively inherited or de novo heterozygous mutations. Among these 30 cases, there were 12 cases (31.6%) of neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses (the causing gene contains TPP1, PPT1, CLN5, CLN6 and MFSD8), two cases of sialidosis (the causing gene is NEU1), two cases of neuronopathic Gaucher disease (the causing gene is GBA), one case of spinal muscular atrophy-progressive myoclonic epilepsy (the causing gene is ASAH1), four cases of KCNC1 mutation-related PME, four cases of KCTD7 mutation-related PME, two cases of TBC1D24 mutation-related PME, one case of GOSR2 related PME, and two of dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy (the causing gene is ATN1). In total, 13 PME genes were identified in our cohort. The etiology was not clear in eight patients.

Conclusion

PME is a group of clinically and genetically heterogeneous diseases. Genetic diagnosis was clear in 78.9% of PME patients. Various of genetic testing methods could increase the rate of genetic diagnosis. Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses (NCL) is the most common etiology of PME in children. Nearly one third PME children were diagnosed with NCL. GOSR2 related PME was in our cohort in Asia for the first time.

Background

Progressive myoclonic epilepsy (PME) is a group of regressive neurologic diseases. The clinical features of PME include myoclonus, multiple seizure types, progressive neurological regression, and cerebral and/or cerebellar atrophy [1, 2]. Some PME cases had distinguishing biomarkers, such as lysosomal enzyme tripeptidyl peptidase (TPP1) enzyme or lysosomal palmitoyl protein thioesterase (PPT1) for neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses (NCL) and characteristic clinical feature, such as cherry red spot in the maculae for Sialidosis, which could help us to make accurate disease diagnosis and to choose appropriate genetic tests. However, in most cases, there are a lack of distinguishing clinical features or biomarkers. Consequently, many cases remain unknown of the genetic causes. With the clinical application of the next generation sequencing (NGS), more and more PME related genes were identified [3,4,5,6,7,8]. We have summarized the genetic and clinical features of 26 PME patients in preliminary work [9].

This study is aim to summarize the clinical features of 38 children who were diagnosed with PME, and to identify the causes by choosing appropriate genetic testing methods. The PME patients were collected from three hospitals (Peking University First Hospital, Xuanwu Hospital and Beijing Children’s Hospital) in Beijing China from February 2012 to November 2019.

Materials and methods

PME is characterised by myoclonic seizures, tonic-clonic seizures, and progressive neurological deterioration, typically with cerebellar signs and dementia [10]. The patients included in this study met the following criteria [11]: (1) Myoclonic seizures, with or without generalized convulsive seizures; (2) Mental and/or motor development delay or regression, and the patients could have or not have the features as (3) Cerebellar ataxia; (4) Cerebral and/or cerebellar atrophy.

The clinical data and peripheral blood DNA from children with PME and their parents and other family members were collected. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking University First Hospital. Parental written informed consent was obtained for all children enrolled in this study.

Sanger sequencing of the target genes was conducted in children who had specific clinical feature or biochemical results. For example, the sanger sequencing for TPP1 would be done when tripeptidyl peptidase 1 activity deficiency was found, NEU1 would be tested when cherry red spot in the maculae was observed, and GBA would be tested when deficiency of the lysosomal enzyme, glucocerebrosidase was found. NGS panels of epilepsy and trio-based Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) were performed in children without distinguish biomarkers. Two families had clinical features of Dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy (DRPLA), then the probands and affected family members received the detection of cytosine-adenine-guanine (CAG) repeat number.

Results

Thirty-eight patients diagnosed with PME were enrolled in this study. In the 38 patients, the onset symptoms were seizures in 30 patients, mental and/or motor developmental regression in seven patients, and thrombocytopenia and spleen enlarged in one patient. The seizure onset age ranged from 3 months to 12 years. Seizures were captured in 20 patients during electroencephalogram (EEG) recording, which including myoclonic seizures (n = 16), focal seizures (n = 3), GTCS (n = 1), absence seizures (n = 3), atonic seizures (n = 2), epileptic spasm (n = 2) and tonic seizure (n = 1). Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was abnormal in 26 patients. Four patients had cerebral atrophy, 14 patients had cerebral and cerebellar atrophy, six patients had cerebellar atrophy, and two patients had brain atrophy with abnormal signals in cerebellar. Brain MRI was normal in 12 patients.

Among the 38 patients, 27 were sporadic, 11 were from families with pedigrees suggestive of either dominant or recessive inheritance. The pedigrees of 11 families were shown in Fig. 1. The clinical details of the 38 patients were shown in Table 1. Recessively inherited or a de novo heterozygous mutations in established PME genes were identified in 30 patients (78.9%, 30/38). The gene testing results of the 30 patients were showed in Fig. 2. The genetic causes remained unknown in eight children. All variants and the pathogenic analysis are listed in Table 2.

Fig. 1 The 11 family pedigrees of proband and other affected members. SMA-PME: spinal muscular atrophy-progressive myoclonic epilepsy; PME: progressive myoclonic epilepsy; DRPLA: dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy; TPP1: lysosomal enzyme tripeptidy l peptidase; EEG: electroencephalogram

Case ID, Age at last follow-up, Gender	Onset symptom	Age at disease onset	Age at seizure onset	Seizure type	Mental and motor development (regression age)	Cerebellar ataxia	Loss of vision	Brain MRI	Diagnosis of disease
P1, 3y5m, M	Mental and motor developmental regression	7 m	3y4 m	MS, FS	Regression (1y4 m)	Yes	Yes	Cerebral atrophy	CLN1 disease
P2, 2y8m, F	Mental and motor developmental regression	1y5m	2y5m	MS	Regression (1y5m)	Yes	No	Cerebral and cerebellar atrophy	CLN1 disease
P3, 4y2m, M	Seizure	3y6 m	3y6 m	MS, FS	Regression (4y)	Yes	No	Cerebellar atrophy	CLN2 disease
P4, 4y5m, F	Seizure	2y6 m	2y6 m	MS, FS	Regression (3y)	Yes	No	Cerebral and cerebellar atrophy	CLN2 disease
P5, 3y10m, F	Seizure	2y8m	2y8m	MS, GTCS	Regression (3y)	Yes	No	Cerebral and cerebellar atrophy	CLN2 disease
P6–1, 6y, F	Seizure	3y4 m	3y4 m	MS, FS	Regression (3y5m)	Yes	No	Cerebral and cerebellar atrophy	CLN2 disease
P6–2, 2y9m, F	/	/	/	No seizure	Normal	No	No	NA	/
P7, 4y5m, M,	Seizure	3y3 m	3y3 m	MS, FS	Regression (3y5m)	Yes	No	Cerebellar atrophy	CLN2 disease
P8, 4y5m, M	Seizure	2y9m	2y9m	GTCS, MS	Regression (4y)	Yes	No	Cerebral and cerebellar atrophy	CLN2 disease
P9, 3y4 m, F	Seizure	2y11m	2y11m	MS, FS, GTCS	Regression (3y)	Yes	No	Cerebral atrophy	CLN3 disease
P10, 6y, M	Mental developmental regression	5y7 m	5y11m	MS	Regression (5y7 m)	Yes	Yes	Cerebellar atrophy	CLN5 disease
P11, 7y6 m, M	Motor developmental regression	4y6 m	5y	MS, FS	Regression (4y6 m)	Yes	No	Cerebellar atrophy	CLN6 disease
P12, 11y10m, F	Seizure	7y8m	7y8m	MS, FS, GTCS	Regression (9y6 m)	Yes	Yes	Normal (11y10m)	CLN7 disease
P13–1, 6y9m, F	Seizure	2y6 m	2y6 m	MS, Abs, GTCS	Regression (3y)	NA	Yes	Cerebral and cerebellar atrophy	CLN7 disease
P13–2, 4y5m, M	Motor developmental regression	2y	4y	MS, Abs	Regression (2y)	NA	No	Cerebral and cerebellar atrophy	CLN7 disease
P13–3, 7y, M	Seizure	2y6 m	2y6 m	MS	Regression (3y)	NA	Yes	NA	CLN7 disease?
P14, 14y, F	Limb pain and motor developmental regression	12y	12y	MS, GTCS	Regression (12y)	Yes	Yes	Cerebellar atrophy	Sialidosis
P15–1, 13y9m, F	Limb pain and motor developmental regression	7y	13y	MS, GTCS	Motor regression (7y)	Yes	Yes	Cerebellar atrophy	Sialidosis
P15–2, 29y, M	Limb pain and motor developmental regression	10y	15y	MS	Motor regression (10y)	Yes	Yes	NA	Sialidosis
P16–1, 12y, F	Seizure	7y4 m	7y4 m	FS, MS, GTCS	Regression (10y)	Yes	No	Cerebral and cerebellar atrophy	Gaucher disease type-III
P16–2, 9y, M	Liver and spleen enlargement	NA	/	No seizure	Normal	No	No	NA	Gaucher disease type-I
P17–1, 13y, F	Thrombocytopenia and spleen enlargement	9y	12y	FS, MS	Delayed	No	No	Normal (12y)	Gaucher disease type-III
P17–2, 11y, M	EEG abnormality	8y	/	No seizure	Normal	No	No	NA	Gaucher disease type-I
P18–1, 6y, F	Motor developmental regression	1y2m	4y	MS, aAbs	Regression (1y2m)	Yes	No	Normal (4y)	SMA-PME
P18–2, 4y, M	Motor developmental regression	2y6 m	4y	MS	Regression (2y6 m)	Yes	No	NA	SMA-PME
P19, 3y5m, F	Seizure	3 m	3 m	MS, Abs, FS	Delayed	Yes	No	Normal (2y)	PME
P20, 8y3 m, F	Seizure	4 m	4 m	Ms	Delayed	Yes	No	Normal (8y)	PME
P21, 12y6 m, F	Seizure	11y9m	11y9m	MS, FS	Regression (11y)	Yes	No	Normal (12y)	PME
P22, 13y3 m, F	Seizure	10y	10y	MS, GTCS	Delayed	Yes	No	Normal (13y)	PME
P23, 10y6 m, F	Seizure	1y5m	1y5m	MS, AS, aAbs	Regression (1y7 m)	Yes	No	Normal (9y)	PME
P24, 3y, F	Seizure	2y1m	2y1m	MS, AS	Regression (2y3 m)	Yes	No	Normal (3y)	PME
P25–1, 3y8m, F	Seizure	2y	2y	MS	Regression (2y3 m)	Yes	No	Normal (2y)	PME
P25–2, 9y11m, M	Seizure	1y9m	1y9m	MS, AS, aAbs	Regression (3y5m)	Yes	No	Normal (2y)	PME
P26, 6y4 m, M	Seizure	2y	2y	MS, AS	Regression (2y5m)	Yes	No	Normal (6y)	PME
P27, 10y3 m, F	Seizure	7 m	7 m	MS, FS	Regression (9y)	Yes	No	Brain atrophy with abnormal signals in cerebellum	PME
P28, 5y, M	Seizure	3 m	3 m	MS, FS	Delayed	Yes	No	Brain atrophy with abnormal signals in cerebellum	PME
P29–1, 22y, F	Seizure	11y	11y	MS, GTCS	Regression (11y)	Yes	No	Cerebral and cerebellar atrophy	PME
P29–2, 13y, M	Seizure	8y	8y	MS, GTCS	Regression (8y)	Yes	No	Cerebral and cerebellar atrophy	PME
P30–1, 15y6 m, M	Seizure	6y7 m	6y7 m	MS, FS, GTCS	Regression (7y)	Yes	No	Cerebral and cerebellar atrophy	DRPLA
P30–2, 32y, M	Mental and motor developmental regression	30y	/	No seizure	Regression (30y)	Yes	No	Cerebral and cerebellar atrophy	/
P30–3, 18y, M	Seizure	10y	10y	NA	Regression (10y)	NA	NA	NA	DRPLA
P30–4, 60y, M	Mental and motor developmental regression	40y	/	No seizure	Regression (40y)	Yes	No	NA	/
P30–5, 52y, M	Mental and motor developmental regression	40y	/	No seizure	Regression (40y)	Yes	No	NA	/
P30–6, 60y, F	Mental and motor developmental regression	45y	/	No seizure	Regression (45y)	Yes	No	NA	/
P31–1, 9y8m, M	Seizure	3y	3y	MS, FS, GTCS	Regression (4y)	Yes	No	Cerebral and cerebellar atrophy	DRPLA
P31–2, 6y, M	Mental and motor developmental regression	2y	6y	MS, aAbs	Regression (2y)	Yes	No	NA	DRPLA
P31–3, 34y, M	Seizure	27y	27y	MS, FS	Regression (30y)	Yes	No	NA	DRPLA
P31–4, 40y, M	Mental and motor developmental regression	NA	30y	NA	Regression (NA)	NA	NA	NA	DRPLA
P31–5, 21y, F	Mental and motor developmental regression	NA	8y	NA	Regression (NA)	NA	NA	NA	DRPLA
P32–1, 16y, M	Seizure	11y	11y	MS, FS	Regression (11y)	Yes	No	Cerebral and cerebellar atrophy	PME
P32–2, 23y, F	Seizure	14y	14y	MS, FS	Regression (14y)	Yes	No	Cerebral and cerebellar atrophy	PME
P33, 3y2m, M	Seizure	6 m	6 m	MS, ES	Regression (1y11m)	Yes	NA	Cerebral and cerebellar atrophy	PME
P34, 9y3 m, F	Seizure	2y	2y	MS	Regression (6y)	Yes	No	Cerebral and cerebellar atrophy	PME
P35, 7y7 m, F	Seizure	6y7 m	6y7 m	MS, FS	Delayed	NA	No	Normal (7y)	PME
P36, 6y8m, M	Seizure	5y6 m	5y6 m	MS, GTCS	Delayed	Yes	No	Cerebral and cerebellar atrophy	PME
P37, 2y10m, M	Seizure	4 m	4 m	MS, FS	Delayed	No	Yes	Cerebral atrophy	PME
P38, 5y5m, F	Seizure	6 m	6 m	MS, TS, ES	Delayed	Yes	Yes	Cerebral atrophy	PME

1. MRI magnetic resonance imaging, y year, m month, M male, F female, EEG electroencephalograph, NA not available, MS myoclonic seizure, FS focal seizure, GTCS generalized tonic-clonic seizure, Abs Absence seizures, aAbs atypical Absence seizures, AS atonic seizure, TS tonic seizure, ES epileptic spasm, SMA-PME spinal muscular atrophy-progressive myoclonic epilepsy, PME progressive myoclonic epilepsy, DRPLA Dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy

Fig. 2 The gene testing results of 30 patients with established PME genes. PME: progressive myoclonic epilepsy; DRPLA: dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy; SMA-PME: spinal muscular atrophy-progressive myoclonic epilepsy; NCL: neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses

Case ID	Genetic testing method	Gene	OMIM/ literature inheritance pattern	Genotype	Ensembl transcript ID	Coding DNA change	Amino acid change	Origin	ACMG
P1	Trio-based WES	PPT1	reccessive	het	ENST00000433473	c.372_373insTG	p.Ala125TrpfsTer10	Maternal	Pathogenic
			reccessive	het	ENST00000433473	c.413C > T	p.Ser138Leu	Paternal	Likely pathogenic
P2	Trio-based WES	PPT1	reccessive	het	ENST00000433473	c.413C > T	p.Ser138Leu	Paternal	Likely pathogenic
			reccessive	het	ENST00000433473	c.713C > T	p.Pro238Leu	Maternal	Uncertain significance
P3	Sanger sequencing of TPP1	TPP1	reccessive	hom	ENST00000299427	c.177_180delAAGA [12]	p.Glu59AspfsTer21	Paternal and maternal	Pathogenic
P4	NGS panels of epilepsy	TPP1	reccessive	hom	ENST00000299427	c.515delG	p.Gly172AspfsTer11	Paternal and maternal	Pathogenic
P5	Trio-based WES	TPP1	reccessive	het	ENST00000299427	c.1424C > T [13]	p.Ser475Leu	Maternal	Likely pathogenic
			reccessive	het	ENST00000299427	c.1222_1224del	p.Ser408del	Paternal	Likely pathogenic
P6–1	Trio-based WES and qPCR	TPP1	reccessive	het	ENST00000299427	c.1613C > A	p.Ser538Tyr	Maternal	Likely pathogenic
			reccessive	het	ENST00000299427	1–3 exon deletion	/	Paternal	Pathogenic
P6–2	Sanger sequencing and qPCR	TPP1	reccessive	het	ENST00000299427	c.1613C > A	p.Ser538Tyr	Maternal	Likely pathogenic
			reccessive	het	ENST00000299427	1–3 exon deletion	/	Paternal	Pathogenic
P7	NGS panels of epilepsy	TPP1	reccessive	het	ENST00000299427	c.1424C > T [13]	p.S475L	Paternal	Likely pathogenic
			reccessive	het	ENST00000299427	c.177_180delAAGA [12]	p.Glu59AspfsTer21	Maternal	Pathogenic
P8	Trio-based WES	TPP1	reccessive	het	ENST00000299427	c.1622_1633del	p.Gly541_Pro544del	Maternal	Uncertain significance uncertain
			reccessive	het	ENST00000299427	c.1145 + 3_1145 + 4insGTACTCTAGGTAAGTAAGTACTCTAGGCTAGGTAAGTACTCTACCCTGCCTCCAGGTAGTACTCTAGGTAAGTAAGTACTCTAGGCTGGTA	/	Paternal	Uncertain significance
P9	Trio-based WES	CLN3	reccessive	het	ENST00000360019	c.946G > A	p.Ala316Thr	Paternal	Uncertain significance
			/	/	/	/	/	/	/
P10	Trio-based WES	CLN5	reccessive	hom	ENST00000377453	c.451 T > C	p.Trp151Arg	Paternal and maternal	Uncertain significance
P11	NGS panels of epilepsy	CLN6	reccessive	het	ENST00000249806	c.41delG	p.Gly14AlafsTer19	Maternal	Pathogenic
			reccessive	het	ENST00000249806	c.184C > T [14]	p.Arg62Cys	Paternal	Likely pathogenic
P12	Trio-based WES	MFSD8	reccessive	het	ENST00000296468	c.1351-1G > A	/	Maternal	Pathogenic
			reccessive	het	ENST00000296468	c.557 T > G	p.Phe186Cys	Paternal	Likely pathogenic
P13–1	NGS panels of epilepsy	MFSD8	reccessive	het	ENST00000296468	c.1351-1G > A	/	Paternal	Pathogenic
			reccessive	het	ENST00000296468	c.300 T > G	p.Tyr100Ter	Maternal	Pathogenic
P13–2	NGS panels of epilepsy	MFSD8	reccessive	het	ENST00000296468	c.1351-1G > A	/	Paternal	Pathogenic
			reccessive	het	ENST00000296468	c.300 T > G	p.Tyr100Ter	Maternal	Pathogenic
P13–3	Not done	NA	/	/	/	/	/	/	/
			/	/	/	/	/	/	/
P14	NGS panels of epilepsy	NEU1	reccessive	het	ENST00000375631	c.544 A > G [15]	p.Ser182Gly	Paternal	Pathogenic
			reccessive	het	ENST00000375631	c.239 C > T [16]	p.Pro80Leu	Maternal	Pathogenic
P15–1	Sanger sequencing of NEU1	NEU1	reccessive	het	ENST00000375631	c.544A > G [15]	p.Ser182Gly	Paternal	Pathogenic
			reccessive	het	ENST00000375631	c.239C > T [16]	p.Pro80Leu	Maternal	Pathogenic
P15–2	Sanger sequencing of NEU1	NEU1	reccessive	het	ENST00000375631	c.544A > G [15]	p.Ser182Gly	Paternal	Pathogenic
			reccessive	het	ENST00000375631	c.239C > T [16]	p.Pro80Leu	Maternal	Pathogenic
P16–1	Sanger sequencing of GBA	GBA	reccessive	het	ENST00000327247	c.680A > G [17]	p.Asn227Ser	Paternal	Pathogenic
			reccessive	het	ENST00000327247	c.1448 T > C [18]	p.Leu483Pro	Maternal	Pathogenic
			reccessive	het	ENST00000327247	c.1342G > C [19]	p.Asp448His	Maternal	Pathogenic
P16–2	Sanger sequencing of GBA	GBA	reccessive	het	ENST00000327247	c.680A > G [17]	p.Asn227Ser	Paternal	Pathogenic
			reccessive	het	ENST00000327247	c.1448 T > C [18]	p.Leu483Pro	Maternal	Pathogenic
			reccessive	het	ENST00000327247	c.1342G > C [19]	p.Asp448His	Maternal	Pathogenic
P17	Sanger sequencing of GBA	GBA	reccessive	het	ENST00000327247	c.907C > A	p.Leu303Ile	Paternal	Likely pathogenic
			reccessive	het	ENST00000327247	c.1265_1319del [20]	p.Leu422ProfsTer4	Maternal	Pathogenic
P18–1	NGS panels of epilepsy	ASAH1	reccessive	het	ENST00000381733	c.304_305insA [9]	p.Thr102AsnfsTer14	Paternal	Pathogenic
			reccessive	het	ENST00000381733	c.173C > T [9]	p.Thr58Met	Maternal	Likely pathogenic
P18–2	NGS panels of epilepsy	ASAH1	reccessive	het	ENST00000381733	c.304_305insA [9]	p.Thr102AsnfsTer14	Paternal	Pathogenic
			reccessive	het	ENST00000381733	c.173C > T [9]	p.Thr58Met	Maternal	Likely pathogenic
P19	Trio-based WES	KCNC1	dominant	het	ENST00000265969	c.1262C > T [9]	p.Ala421Val	De novo	Pathogenic
P20	Trio-based WES	KCNC1	dominant	het	ENST00000265969	c.1262C > T [9]	p.Ala421Val	De novo	Pathogenic
P21	Trio-based WES	KCNC1	dominant	het	ENST00000265969	c.959G > A [9]	p.Arg320His	De novo	Pathogenic
P22	Trio-based WES	KCNC1	dominant	het	ENST00000265969	c.959G > A [9]	p.Arg320His	De novo	Pathogenic
P23	NGS panels of epilepsy	KCTD7	reccessive	het	ENST00000275532	c.458G > A [21]	p.Arg153His	Paternal	Uncertain significance
			reccessive	het	ENST00000275532	c.533C > T [22]	p.Ala178Val	Maternal	Uncertain significance
P24	NGS panels of epilepsy	KCTD7	reccessive	het	ENST00000275532	c.184 T > G	p.Phe62Val	Paternal	Likely pathogenic
			reccessive	het	ENST00000275532	c.341G > A	p.Gly114Glu	Maternal	Likely pathogenic
P25–1	Trio-based WES	KCTD7	reccessive	het	ENST00000275532	c.440 T > C	p.Leu147Pro	Maternal	Likely pathogenic
			reccessive	het	ENST00000275532	c.520G > A	p.Ala174Thr	Paternal	Uncertain significance
P25–2	Trio-based WES	KCTD7	reccessive	het	ENST00000275532	c.440 T > C	p.Leu147Pro	Maternal	Likely pathogenic
			reccessive	het	ENST00000275532	c.520G > A	p.Ala174Thr	Paternal	Uncertain significance
P26	Trio-based WES	KCTD7	reccessive	het	ENST00000275532	c.384G > C	p.Glu128Asp	Paternal	Uncertain significance
			reccessive	het	ENST00000275532	c.845A > G	p.Tyr282Cys	Maternal	Uncertain significance
P27	NGS panels of epilepsy	TBC1D24	reccessive	het	ENST00000567020	c.241_252del [9]	p.81_84del	Paternal	Pathogenic
			reccessive	het	ENST00000567020	c.1153C > T [9]	p.Gln385Ter	Maternal	Pathogenic
P28	Trio-based WES	TBC1D24	reccessive	het	ENST00000567020	c.241_252del [9]	p.81_84del	Maternal	Pathogenic
			reccessive	het	ENST00000567020	c.139A > G [9]	p.Ser47Gly	De novo	Likely pathogenic
P29–1	Trio-based WES	GOSR2	reccessive	het	ENST00000225567	c.146delA [9]	p.Glu49AspfsTer25	Maternal	Pathogenic
			reccessive	het	ENST00000225567	c.478-16 T > A [9]	/	Paternal	Uncertain significance
P29–2	Trio-based WES	GOSR2	reccessive	het	ENST00000225567	c.146delA [9]	p.Glu49AspfsTer25	Maternal	Pathogenic
			reccessive	het	ENST00000225567	c.478-16 T > A [9]	/	Paternal	Uncertain significance
P30–1	Trio-based WES and detection of trinucleotide (CAG) repeat number	ATN1	dominant	het	/	CAG repeats was 70 [9]	/	Paternal	/
P30–2	Detection of trinucleotide (CAG) repeat number	ATN1	dominant	het	/	/	/	/	/
P30–3	Not done	NA	/	/	/	/	/	/	/
P31–1	Trio-based WES and detection of trinucleotide (CAG) repeat number	ATN1	dominant	het	/	CAG repeats was 73	/	Paternal	/
P31–2	Detection of trinucleotide (CAG) repeat number	ATN1	dominant	het	/	CAG repeats was 74	/	/	/
P31–3	Detection of trinucleotide (CAG) repeat number	ATN1	dominant	het	/	CAG repeats was 63	/	/	/
P31–4	Not done	NA	/	/	/	/	/	/	/
P31–5	Not done	NA	/	/	/	/	/	/	/
P32–1	Trio-based WES	Negative	/	/	/	/	/	/	/
P32–2	Trio-based WES	Negative	/	/	/	/	/	/	/
P33	Trio-based WES	Negative	/	/	/	/	/	/	/
P34	Trio-based WES	Negative	/	/	/	/	/	/	/
P35	Trio-based WES	Negative	/	/	/	/	/	/	/
P36	Trio-based WES	Negative	/	/	/	/	/	/	/
P37	Trio-based WES	Negative	/	/	/	/	/	/	/
P38	Trio-based WES	Negative	/	/	/	/	/	/	/

1. OMIM Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man, ACMG American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, WES whole exome sequencing, NGS next-generation sequencing, qPCR real-time quantitative PCR, NA not available, het heterozygosis, hom homozygosis

Mutations in well-recognized PME genes

Sixteen children had mutations in well-recognized PME genes. Seven genes were identified, including TPP1, PPT1, CLN5, CLN6, CLN7(MFSD8), NEU1 and GBA. One child (P9) was found with one variant in CLN3 inherited from her father.

Pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in NCL-associated genes were identified in 12 children whose clinical features were consistent with the diagnosis of NCL, including TPP1 in six children, PPT1 in two children, CLN5 in one child, CLN6 in one child, and MFSD8 (CLN7) in two children.

Six children accepted the test for specific lysosomal enzyme. Five children were found the lack of lysosomal enzyme TPP1 activity, and all of them had mutations in TPP1. Among the five children, one (P6–1) was found with a missense variant (p.Ser538Tyr) and 1 to 3 exons deletion in TTP1.The result was confirmed by Real-time Quantitative PCR (qPCR) (Fig. 3). Enzyme TPP1 activity was also very low in her younger sister (P6–2) who was found with the same genotype of P6–1. No clinical manifestations at the last follow-up (2 years of age) were observed in P6–2, and further follow-up was needed.

Fig. 3 Real-time quantitative PCR results of patient P6–1 and her parents. The qPCR results confirmed the deletion of exons 1–3 in TPP1 gene in patient P6–1 and her father as compared to a normal control

One child (P10) was found PPT1 enzyme deficiency, he was identified with homozygous missense CLN5 mutations (p.Trp151Arg) by trio-based WES. He had seizure onset at the age of 5 years and 7 months, recognition regression was also observed. EEG recordings showed generalized epileptiform discharges, and the brain MRI scans showed cerebellar atrophy.

One child (P9) was found with one variant in CLN3 inherited from her father by trio-based WES. The other variant or Copy number variations (CNVs) had not been found even after reanalyzing the sequencing data carefully. The genetic diagnosis of P9 was not clear. Maybe the whole genome sequencing could be used to find disease-causing genes. She had seizure onset at the age of 2 years and 11 months, the seizure types included myoclonic seizure, focal seizure and generalized tonic-clonic seizure (GTCS). Recognition regression was observed at 3 years old. EEG recordings showed generalized epileptiform discharges, and the brain MRI scans showed Cerebral atrophy.

Two unrelated children (P14 and P15–1) had the same compound heterozygous mutations in NEU1 (p.Ser182Gly and p.Pro80Leu). P14 had a cherry red spot in the maculae of both eyes and her genetic testing was conducted by NGS epilepsy panel. Another P15–1 had atrophy of the optic nerve in both eyes, and her elder brother (P15–2) had similar phenotype and the same genotype. According to the clinical manifestation, they were suspected of the diagnosis of sialidosis. Mutations of NEU1 were detected by sanger sequencing. Combining with the clinical phenotype and gene result, they were diagnosed with sialidosis.

Two children (P16–1 and P17–1) had mutations in GBA and deficiency of the lysosomal enzyme glucocerebrosidase, both of them had mental and motor development delay or regression and seizures, and they were diagnosed with neuronopathic Gaucher disease. P16–1 was found with three variants in GBA, the variant p.Asn227Ser was paternal, the variants p.Leu483Pro and p.Asp448His were maternal. The three variants are pathogenic or likely pathogenic according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines [23]. Her younger brother (P16–2) only had liver and spleen enlarged without neurologic manifestations, who had the same three variants in GBA. P16–2 was diagnosed with Gaucher disease type-I. P17–1 had compound heterozygous mutations in GBA, p.Leu303Ile and p.Leu422Profs*4. The younger brother (P17–2) was found with the same mutations in GBA, but he only had electroencephalograph abnormality at 8 years old. The last follow age of P17–2 was 11 years old, and he had no seizures or any other clinical symptoms. The further follow-up was needed.

Mutations in newly reported PME-related genes

Twelve children were found with newly reported PME-related gene mutations. Five genes were identified, including ASAH1, KCNC1, KCTD7, TBC1D24 and GOSR2.

One patient (P18–1) manifested with severe motor development regression at the age of 1 year and 2 months, followed by frequent myoclonic seizures at the age of 3 years and 9 months. She died of status epilepticus at the age of 6 years. Her younger brother (P18–2) had similar clinical manifestations. The genetic testing by NGS epilepsy panel showed that both of them had compound heterozygous mutations in ASAH1 (p.Thr102AsnfsTer14 and p.Thr58Met). Combined with the phenotype and genotype features, they were diagnosed with spinal muscular atrophy-progressive myoclonic epilepsy (SMA-PME).

Four children were found with de novo heterozygous mutations in KCNC1. The genetic testing of three were by trio-based WES, and one by NGS epilepsy panel. Two children (P21 and P22) had the same mutation p.Arg320His in KCNC1, which affected a highly conserved arginine residue in segment S4. This variant was reported to be a recurrent mutation [5, 24]. Two children (P19 and P20) were identified with the mutation p.Ala421Val in KCNC1, which was in the segment S6. What interesting is that we found the phenotypic differences were associated with different genotypes. The seizure onset age of two children with mutation p.Ala421Val were 3 and 4 months old respectively, and the seizure onset age of two children with mutation p.Arg320His were 11 years and 9 months and 10 years old respectively. The seizure onset age of children with the variant p.Ala421Val is much earlier than that of with the variant p.Arg320His. MRI scans were normal in four children with KCNC1 mutations, and the last follow-up age was ranged from 3 years and 5 months old to 13 years and 3 months old.

Four children (P23, P24, P25–1 and P26) were found with compound heterozygous mutations in KCTD7 by trio-based WES and NGS panel of epilepsy respectively. Their clinical phenotypes were similar, and the seizure onset age was between 1 year and 5 months to 2 years and 1 month old. Frequent myoclonic seizures and atonic seizures were common, and GTCS were rare. EEG recordings showed generalized epileptiform discharges with large number of discharges in Rolandic area in some cases. MRI scans were normal in four children, and the last follow-up age was ranged from 3 to 10 years and 6 months old. There were eight different variants in four children, and no recurrent variants were found. The elder brother (P25–2) of P25–1 had similar clinical manifestations and the same genotype (p.Leu147Pro and p.Ala174Thr).

Compound heterozygous mutations in TBC1D24 were identified in two children (P27 and P28) by trio-based WES and NGS panel of epilepsy respectively, they were p.81_84del in both children, p.Gln385Ter and p.Ser47Gly in one child each. Two patients exhibited similar clinical phenotypes. The seizure onset age was at 7 and 3 months respectively. The frequent multifocal myoclonus was prominent feature, which could last for several hours to 2 weeks and developed into epilepsia partialis continua (EPC). The EPC could be triggered by fever or infections and could be terminated by sleep or sedation drugs especially by chloral hydrate. The multifocal myoclonus and ictal scalp EEG data lacked clear correlation. Both of the two children were found with cerebral and cerebellar atrophy with abnormal signals in cerebellar, which have been described in our previous publication [25]. P27 was found to have sensorineural deafness at the age of 9 years after a severe EPC which last for 14 days, and her hearing was normal before this EPC.

One child (P29–1) was found with two novel variants in GOSR2 (p.Glu49AspfsTer25 and c.478-16 T > A) by trio-based WES. Her younger brother (P29–2) who had similar clinical phenotype harbored the same variants. The seizure onset age of them was 11 and 8 years old respectively. Seizure types included myoclonic seizures and GTCS. The motor development regression was prominent, and they could hardly walk steadily at the age of 13 and 9 years respectively. Their EEG recordings showed generalized epileptiform discharges. The brain MRI scans showed cerebral and cerebellar atrophy in both children. The frameshift variant p.Glu49AspfsTer25 was pathogenic according to ACMG guidelines. The splice-site variant c.478-16 T > A was uncertain significant according to ACMG guidelines.

Two dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy families

The patient P30–1 had seizures at the age of 6 years and 7 months, the seizure types included myoclonic seizures, focal seizures and GTCS. He had severe mental retardation and motor development regression. EEG recordings showed generalized epileptiform discharges. The brain MRI scans showed cerebral and cerebellar atrophy. There were six family members affected in family of P30–1. His father (P30–2), two uncles (P30–4 and P30–5) and grandmother (P30–6) were found to walk unsteadily with recognition regression at the age of 30 to 45 years, but they did not had seizures. His cousin (P30–3) had seizure attacks at the age of 10 years, and he died in sleep at the age of 18 years, which could be sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). Multiple family members had similar clinical manifestations suggested a genetic cause. However, the trio-based WES did not find any disease related gene mutations. Reanalyzed the family history and clinical phenotype, we observed anticipation, a phenomenon characterized by the earlier age of onset and more severe phenotype in successive generations in this family. In addition, the patient could be diagnosed with PME. Therefore, the patient was diagnosed with DRPLA.

DRPLA is an autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disorder caused by CAG triplet expansion in atrophin 1 (ATN1). Fragment analysis with laser induced fluorescence in capillary electrophoresis was performed for the CAG repeats of ATN1. Expanded CAG repeats of ATN1 were detected in probands and the affected family members. The CAG repeats number of proband (P30–1), his father (P30–2), one of the affected uncles (P30–5) were 70, 63 and 62, respectively. The CAG repeats number of his mother (family 30-II-14) and uncle (family 30-II-9) with normal phenotype were less than 20.

The family of P31–1 had clinical phenotypes similar to the family of P30–1. Five family members were affected in family of P31–1. The patient P31–1 had seizure onset at the age of 3 years, and he exhibited walking unsteadily with intelligence regression at the age of 8 years. The clinical details of his younger brother (P31–2), his father (P31–3), his grandfather (P31–4) and his aunt (P31–5) were shown in Table 1. Expanded CAG repeats of ATN1 were also detected in proband and the affected family members. The CAG repeats number of proband, his younger brother and his father were 73, 74 and 63 respectively, whereas the repeats number of his mother (family 31-III-4) and grandfather (family 31-II-3) with normal phenotype were less than 20 and 56 respectively.

The genetic causes remained unknown in seven children

The genetic causes remained unknown in seven children. The onset symptoms of the seven children were seizure attack, and the onset age ranged from 4 months to 11 years old. The seizure types included myoclonic seizures in seven children, focal seizures in three children, tonic seizure in one child, epileptic spasm in two children and GTCS in one child. All of the seven children had mental retardation and motor development regression. The EEG recordings showed generalized epileptiform discharges in seven children, focal epileptiform discharges in three children and hypsarrhythmia in two children. The brain MRI scans showed cerebral and cerebellar atrophy in four children, cerebral atrophy in two children. The brain MRI scan was normal in one child when she was 7 years old in the last follow up. Seven children were all diagnosed with PME according to the clinical features, EEG and MRI results. All seven children received trio-based WES, but none of them were found with disease causing mutations. Metabolic laboratory screening was also performed in seven children, and the results were normal.

Discussion

PME is a group of neurodegenerative diseases with genetic heterogeneity and phenotypic similarities. It is a challenge to make precise clinical diagnosis of specific forms of PME. However, detailed clinical information, history collection, necessary examination and laboratory test could help to make the final diagnosis. The proper genetical testing method may also assist in making precise etiological diagnosis.

More than 30 genes were reported to be related with PME [5, 10, 26]. It was difficult to sequence all the genes one by one. NGS technology enables massively parallel sequencing of multiple genes, which enables fast and comprehensive genetic analysis [27]. However, NGS does not reliably detect triplet repeat expansions, and CAG repeat number analysis was required when DRPLA was considered as the clinical diagnosis [28]. In this study, sanger sequencing of the target gene, NGS panels of epilepsy, trio-based WES and detection of CAG repeat number were used to investigate the genetic causes. Consequently, 78.9% (30/38) children reached genetic diagnosis, and 13 genes related to PME were identified in our study. Muona et al. exome-sequenced 84 unrelated PME patients of unknown cause and molecularly solved 31% cases [5]. The rate of genetic diagnosis of our study was higher than Muona et al., which suggested that various of genetic testing methods should be considered in order to improve the molecular diagnostics of PME.

DRPLA is an autosomal-dominant disorder, caused by unstable expansion of CAG repeats of ATN1 [10]. The expanded repeats are unstable and tend to expand further, which leads to earlier age onset and a more severe phenotype in successive generations. This phenomenon is known as anticipation [28]. Some individuals carried alleles of intermediate repeat length, which are not large enough to cause disease, but are large enough to be prone to further expansion in the next generation [29]. Schols et al. reported that the intermediate repeat ranged from 36 to 49 in DRPLA [28]. In our study, the grandfather (family 31-II-3) of P31–1 had normal clinical phenotype, however, his CAG repeats number in ATN1 was 56, which was larger than 50, and was transmitted to next generation with expanded copies. This suggested that the intermediate repeat could be longer than what it is supposed to be.

In our study, the child P10 was found lysosomal PPT1 deficiency. Homozygous missense mutations c.451 T > C (p.Trp151Arg) in CLN5 were identified using WES. This phenomenon suggested NCL proteins may share common functions or participate in the same biological pathway or process [30]. There are 13 known proteins of NCL family. Unfortunately, the precise functions of many NCL proteins are still unclear. PPT1/CLN1 is one of the lysosomal enzymes, and CLN5 is a soluble lysosomal protein [30, 31]. Lyly, et al. demonstrated a close relationship between CLN5 and PPT1/CLN1 proteins by showing the protein interactions between the two and significantly increased expression levels of Cln1 mRNA in the Cln5−/− mouse brain tissue. Their results suggest a possible compensatory role for PPT1 in CLN5 deficiency [32]. Those studies could help to explain the phenomenon in our study. However, in our patient with homozygous missense mutations CLN5, PPT1/CLN1 deficiency existed in peripheral blood, but it was difficult to know for sure whether the expression level of PPT1 decreased in his brain tissue.

In our study, PME related gene mutations were identified in 30 patients, and 12 of which (31.6%) were found with mutations in NCL related genes (PPT1, TPP1, CLN5, CLN6 and MFSD8). The most prevalent gene was TPP1, which was identified in six (15.8%, 6/38) children. KCNC1 and KCTD7 mutations were found in four children (10.5%, 4/38) for each. In the study of Muona et al., 11 unrelated exome-sequenced patients (13%) were identified with the same recurrent de novo mutation c.959G > A (p.Arg320His) in KCNC1, which accounts for the most in 26 molecularly solved patients [5]. The incidence of KCNC1 in our study was close to that in the study of Muona et al.

Apart from p.Arg320His, we found another recurrent de novo mutation c.1262C > T (p.Ala421Val) in KCNC1 which could also cause PME. Interestingly, the phenotype was related to genotype. The seizure onset age of two children with the mutation p.Ala421Val was 3 and 4 months respectively. Three sporadic children were also reported to harbor the mutation p.Ala421Val, and the seizure onset age of them were 5 months, 3 weeks and 5 months respectively [33]. However, the seizure onset age of two children with mutation p.Arg320His in our study were 11 years and 9 months of age and 10 years old respectively, and the seizure onset age of 22 children in reported study were 3 to 15 years [5, 24]. Apparently, the seizure onset age of patients with mutation p.Ala421Val is much earlier than that of patients with mutation p.Arg320His.

The onset age varied in PME patients with different genes. In this study, the onset age is before 3 years old for all children who diagnosed with CLN1 (PPT1), SMA-PME (ASAH1), KCTD7 related PME and TBC1D24 related PME, and also for some children who diagnosed with CLN2 (TPP1), CLN7 (MFSD8), KCNC1 related PME and DRPLA (ATN1). Moreover, the onset age could be earlier than 1 year old for some children who diagnosed with CLN1 (PPT1), KCNC1 related PME and TBC1D24 related PME.

The homozygous missense mutations c.430G > T (p.Gly144Trp) in GOSR2 was firstly reported in four unrelated PME patients in 2011 [8]. The main clinical features of the GOSR2-associated PME are early-onset ataxia, action myoclonus and seizures, relative preservation of cognitive function until the late stages of the disease. GOSR2-associated PME is a rare disease with very few cases reported so far [34, 35]. Most PME patients are homozygous for a p.Gly144Trp mutation and develop similar clinical presentations. Recently, more variants including c.491_493delAGA (p.Lys164del) and c.491_493delAGA (p.K164del) have been reported [36, 37]. The syndrome was called ‘North Sea PME’ given the fact that all patients originated from countries surrounding the North Sea [34]. It is the first time for GOSR2-associated PME reported in countries outside the area, and both of c.146delA (p.Glu49AspfsTer25) and c.478-16 T > A are novel variants. However, the pathogenicity of splice-site variant c.478-16 T > A remains uncertain, and further study such as qPCR is needed for functional analysis. It was the first time for GOSR2 mutations related PME reported in Asia. Our study contributed to expand the genotype of this condition.

The genetic causes remained unknown in eight children. Their clinical features meet the diagnostic criteria of PME. All eight children received trio-based WES, but none of them were found with disease causing mutations. All of the parents of the eight children did not have mental and/or motor development delay or regression or epilepsy, and the CAG triple expansion were not tested in them, which often be test when much family members were affected such as DRPLA. Maybe the whole genome sequencing could be used to find disease-causing genes.

Conclusion

The seizure onset age of PME varies, it could be ranged from infant to adult. PME is a group of neurogenetic diseases with phenotypic and genotypic heterogeneity. Accurate diagnosis is very challenging. In combination of detailed clinical phenotype information, specific laboratory results and various of genetic testing methods including sanger sequencing of single gene, NGS panels of epilepsy, trio-based WES and detection of CAG repeat number, etiological diagnosis could finally be obtained. The NCL was most common in PME related diseases. The novel mutations in GOSR2 expanded the genotype of PME, and this gene related PME are not only found in areas surrounding the North Sea. The onset age could be before 3 years old for some children whose diagnosis are CLN1, CLN2, CLN7, SMA-PME, KCNC1 related PME, KCTD7 related PME, TBC1D24 related PME, and DRPLA.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets during and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ACMG: American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics

ATN1: Atrophin 1

by CAG: Cytosine-adenine-guanine

CNVs: Copy number variations

DRPLA: Dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy

EEG: Electroencephalogram

EPC: Epilepsia partialis continua

GTCS: Generalized tonic-clonie seizure

MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging

NCL: Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses

NGS: Next generation sequencing

PME: Progressive myoclonic epilepsy

PPT1: Lysosomal palmitoyl protein thioesterase

qPCR: Real-time Quantitative PCR

SMA-PME: Spinal muscular atrophy-progressive myoclonic epilepsy

SUDEP: Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy

TPP1: Lysosomal enzyme tripeptidyl peptidase

WES: Whole exome sequencing

References

1. Proposal for Revised Classification of Epilepsies and Epileptic Syndromes. Commission on classification and terminology of the International League Against Epilepsy. Epilepsia. 1989;30(4):389–99.

2. Genetics of epilepsy and genetic epilepsies., John Libbey Eurotext, France, 2009.

3. Minassian BA. The progressive myoclonus epilepsies. Prog Brain Res. 2014;213:113–22.

4. Hallmann K, Zsurka G, Moskau-Hartmann S, Kirschner J, Korinthenberg R, Ruppert AK, et al. A homozygous splice-site mutation in CARS2 is associated with progressive myoclonic epilepsy. Neurology. 2014;83(23):2183–7.

5. Muona M, Berkovic S, Dibbens L, Oliver K, Maljevic S, Bayly M, et al. A recurrent de novo mutation in KCNC1 causes progressive myoclonus epilepsy. Nat Genet. 2015;47(1):39–46.

6. Van Bogaert P. KCTD7-related progressive myoclonus epilepsy. Epileptic Disord. 2016;18(S2):115–9.

7. Siintola E, Topcu M, Aula N, Lohi H, Minassian BA, Paterson AD, et al. The novel neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis gene MFSD8 encodes a putative lysosomal transporter. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81(1):136–46.

8. Corbett MA, Schwake M, Bahlo M, Dibbens LM, Lin M, Gandolfo LC, et al. A mutation in the Golgi Qb-SNARE gene GOSR2 causes progressive myoclonus epilepsy with early ataxia. Am J Hum Genet. 2011;88(5):657–63.

9. Zhang J, Zhang YH, Chen JY, Ji TY, Yang ZX, Yang XL, et al. Pathogenic gene variants and clinical phenotype features of 26 children with progressive myoclonic epilepsy. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2019;57(6):458–64.

10. Shahwan A, Farrell M, Delanty N. Progressive myoclonic epilepsies: a review of genetic and therapeutic aspects. Lancet Neurol. 2005;4(4):239–48.

11. Michelucci R, Pasini E, Riguzzi P, Andermann E, Kälviäinen R, Genton P. Myoclonus and seizures in progressive myoclonus epilepsies: pharmacology and therapeutic trials. Epileptic Disord. 2016;18:145–53.

12. Chang X, Huang Y, Meng H, Jiang Y, Wu Y, Xiong H, et al. Clinical study in Chinese patients with late-infantile form neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses. Brain Dev. 2012;34(9):739–45.

13. Sleat DE, Gin RM, Sohar I, Wisniewski K, Sklower-Brooks S, Pullarkat RK, et al. Mutational analysis of the defective protease in classic late-infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis, a neurodegenerative lysosomal storage disorder. Am J Hum Genet. 1999;64(6):1511–23.

14. Cannelli N, Garavaglia B, Simonati A, Aiello C, Barzaghi C, Pezzini F, et al. Variant late infantile ceroid lipofuscinoses associated with novel mutations in CLN6. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009;379(4):892–7.

15. Chen CM, Lai SC, Chen IC, Hsu KC, Lyu RK, Ro LS, et al. First report of two Taiwanese siblings with sialidosis type I: a 10-year follow-up study. J Neurol Sci. 2006;247(1):65–9.

16. Itoh K, Naganawa Y, Matsuzawa F, Aikawa S, Doi H, Sasagasako N, et al. Novel missense mutations in the human lysosomal sialidase gene in sialidosis patients and prediction of structural alterations of mutant enzymes. J Hum Genet. 2002;47(1):29–37.

17. Montfort M, Chabás A, Vilageliu L, Grinberg D. Functional analysis of 13 GBA mutant alleles identified in Gaucher disease patients: pathogenic changes and “modifier” polymorphisms. Hum Mutat. 2004;23(6):567–75.

18. Tammachote R, Tongkobpetch S, Srichomthong C, Phipatthanananti K, Pungkanon S, Wattanasirichaigoon D, et al. A common and two novel GBA mutations in Thai patients with Gaucher disease. J Hum Genet. 2013;58(9):594–9.

19. Liou B, Kazimierczuk A, Zhang M, Scott CR, Hegde RS, Grabowski GA. Analyses of variant acid beta-glucosidases: effects of Gaucher disease mutations. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(7):4242–53.

20. Beutler E. Gaucher disease as a paradigm of current issues regarding single gene mutations of humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90(12):5384–90.

21. Nykamp K, Anderson M, Powers M, Garcia J, Herrera B, Ho YY, et al. Sherloc: a comprehensive refinement of the ACMG-AMP variant classification criteria. Genet Med. 2017;19(10):1105–17.

22. Mastrangelo M, Sartori S, Simonati A, Brinciotti M, Moro F, Nosadini M, et al. Progressive myoclonus epilepsy and ceroidolipofuscinosis 14: The multifaceted phenotypic spectrum of KCTD7-related disorders. Eur J Med Genet. 2019;62(12):103591.

23. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17(5):405–24.

24. Oliver KL, Franceschetti S, Milligan CJ, Muona M, Mandelstam SA, Canafoglia L, et al. Myoclonus epilepsy and ataxia due to KCNC1 mutation: analysis of 20 cases and K(+) channel properties. Ann Neurol. 2017;81(5):677–89.

25. Zhang J, Chen J, Zeng Q, Zhang L, Tian X, Yang X, et al. Infantile epilepsy with multifocal myoclonus caused by TBC1D24 mutations. Seizure. 2019;69:228–34.

26. Girard JM, Turnbull J, Ramachandran N, Minassian BA. Progressive myoclonus epilepsy. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;113:1731–6.

27. Wright CF, Fitzpatrick DR, Firth HV. Paediatric genomics: diagnosing rare disease in children. Nat Rev Genet. 2018;19(5):253–68.

28. Schols L, Bauer P, Schmidt T, Schulte T, Riess O. Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxias: clinical features, genetics, and pathogenesis. Lancet Neurol. 2004;3(5):291–304.

29. Soong BW, Paulson HL. Spinocerebellar ataxias: an update. Curr Opin Neurol. 2007;20(4):438–46.

30. Huber RJ. Using the social amoeba Dictyostelium to study the functions of proteins linked to neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis. J Biomed Sci. 2016;23(1):83.

31. Kousi M, Lehesjoki AE, Mole SE. Update of the mutation spectrum and clinical correlations of over 360 mutations in eight genes that underlie the neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses. Hum Mutat. 2012;33(1):42–63.

32. Lyly A, Von Schantz C, Heine C, Schmiedt ML, Sipila T, Jalanko A, et al. Novel interactions of CLN5 support molecular networking between neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinosis proteins. BMC Cell Biol. 2009;10:83.

33. Park J, Koko M, Hedrich UBS, Hermann A, Cremer K, Haberlandt E, et al. KCNC1-related disorders: new de novo variants expand the phenotypic spectrum. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2019;6(7):1319–26.

34. Boisse Lomax L, Bayly MA, Hjalgrim H, Moller RS, Vlaar AM, Aaberg KM, et al. ‘North Sea’ progressive myoclonus epilepsy: phenotype of subjects with GOSR2 mutation. Brain. 2013;136(Pt 4):1146–54.

35. Dibbens LM, Rubboli G. GOSR2: a progressive myoclonus epilepsy gene. Epileptic Disord. 2016;18(S2):111–4.

36. Praschberger R, Balint B, Mencacci NE, Hersheson J, Rubio-Agusti I, Kullmann DM, et al. Expanding the phenotype and genetic defects associated with the GOSR2 Gene. Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2015;2(3):271–3.

37. Volker JM, Dergai M, Abriata LA, Mingard Y, Ysselstein D, Krainc D, et al. Functional assays for the assessment of the pathogenicity of variants of GOSR2, an ER-to-Golgi SNARE involved in progressive myoclonus epilepsies. Dis Model Mech. 2017;10(12):1391–8.