It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Choroidal thickness is associated with many ocular conditions, interchangeability among different generations of optical coherence tomography is therefore important for both research purpose and clinical application. Hence, we compared choroidal thickness measurements between spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) in healthy paediatric eyes. A total of 114 children from the population-based Hong Kong Children Eye Study with mean age of 7.38 ± 0.82 years were included. Choroidal thickness of the right eye was measured by both devices. The central foveal choroidal thickness (CFCT) measured by SD-OCT and SS-OCT was 273.24 ± 54.29 μm and 251.84 ± 47.12 μm respectively. Inter-device correlation coefficient was 0.840 (95% CI 0.616–0.918). However, choroidal thickness obtained by SD-OCT was significantly thicker than that measured by SS-OCT with a mean difference of 21.40 ± 33.13 μm (P < 0.001). Bland–Altman limit of agreement on the relative difference scale for SD-OCT/SS-OCT was 86.33 μm. Validated conversion equation for translating SD-OCT CFCT measurement into SS-OCT was SS-OCT = 35.261 + 0.810 × SD-OCT. In conclusion, intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) shows an acceptable agreement between SD-OCT and SS-OCT, however, there was a significant inter-device difference of choroidal thickness measurements in normal children eyes. Therefore, the measurements are not interchangeable.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Hong Kong SAR, China (GRID:grid.10784.3a) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0482)
2 The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Hong Kong SAR, China (GRID:grid.10784.3a) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0482); Prince of Wales Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Hong Kong SAR, China (GRID:grid.415197.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 1764 7206)
3 The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Hong Kong SAR, China (GRID:grid.10784.3a) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0482); Prince of Wales Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Hong Kong SAR, China (GRID:grid.415197.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 1764 7206); Hong Kong Eye Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China (GRID:grid.490089.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 1803 8779)