It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The Mongolian Plateau hosts two different governments: the Mongolian People’s Republic and the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, a provincial-level government of the People’s Republic of China. The divergence between these governments has widened in the past century, mostly due to a series of institutional changes that generated different socioeconomic and demographic trajectories. Due to its high latitude and altitude, the Plateau has been highly sensitive to the rapid changes in global and regional climates that have altered the spatial and temporal distributions of energy and water. Based on a recent workshop to synthesize findings on the sustainability of the Plateau amidst socioeconomic and environmental change, we identify five critical issues facing the social-ecological systems (SES): (1) divergent and uncertain changes in social and ecological characteristics; (2) declining prevalence of nomadism; (3) consequences of rapid urbanization in transitional economies; (4) the unsustainability of large-scale afforestation efforts in the semi-arid and arid areas of Inner Mongolia; and (5) the role of institutional changes in shaping the SES on the Plateau. We emphasize that lessons learned in Inner Mongolia are valuable, but may not always apply to Mongolia. National land management policies and regulations have long-term effects on the sustainability of SES; climate change adaptation policies and practices must be tuned to local conditions and should be central to decision-making on natural resource management and socioeconomic development pathways.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details









1 Department of Geography, Environment, and Spatial Sciences and Center for Global Change and Earth Observations, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, United States of America
2 Department of Geography, Environment, and Spatial Sciences and Center for Global Change and Earth Observations, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, United States of America; Department of Geography, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, United States of America
3 Eastern Forest Environmental Threat Assessment Center, USDA Forest Service, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, United States of America
4 School of Planning, Design, and Construction and Center for Global Change and Earth Observations, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, United States of America
5 Department of Forest & Rangeland Stewardship and Center for Collaborative Conservation,, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, United States of America
6 School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36949, United States of America
7 School of Planning, Design, and Construction and Center for Global Change and Earth Observations, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, United States of America; School of Global Policy and Strategy, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States of America
8 Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
9 North Carolina State University at NOAA, National Centers for Environment Information, North Carolina State University, Asheville, NC 28801, United States of America; P P Shirshov Institute for Oceanology, RAS, 36 Nakhimovskiy Ave., Moscow, 117997, Russia; Hydrology Science and Services Corp., Asheville, NC 28804, United States of America
10 Department of Geography, The George Washington University, Washington DC, United States of America
11 School of Life Sciences and School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, United States of America
12 Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, People’s Republic of China
13 Department of Economics, University of the Humanities, Ulaanbaatar 210620, Mongolia
14 School of Life Sciences, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, People’s Republic of China
15 NASA Headquarters, 300 E Street, SW, Washington, DC 20546, United States of America
16 Institute of Arctic Biology, Biology & Wildlife Department, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775, United States of America
17 Department of Geography, University of Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China; Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Bari, Bari, I-70126, Italy