It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Forests dominate carbon (C) exchanges between the terrestrial biosphere and the atmosphere on land. In the long term, the net carbon flux between forests and the atmosphere has been significantly impacted by changes in forest cover area and structure due to ecological disturbances and management activities. Current empirical approaches for estimating net ecosystem productivity (NEP) rarely consider forest age as a predictor, which represents variation in physiological processes that can respond differently to environmental drivers, and regrowth following disturbance. Here, we conduct an observational synthesis to empirically determine to what extent climate, soil properties, nitrogen deposition, forest age and management influence the spatial and interannual variability of forest NEP across 126 forest eddy-covariance flux sites worldwide. The empirical models explained up to 62% and 71% of spatio-temporal and across-site variability of annual NEP, respectively. An investigation of model structures revealed that forest age was a dominant factor of NEP spatio-temporal variability in both space and time at the global scale as compared to abiotic factors, such as nutrient availability, soil characteristics and climate. These findings emphasize the importance of forest age in quantifying spatio-temporal variation in NEP using empirical approaches.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Department for Biogeochemical Integration, Max-Planck-Institute for Biogeochemistry, Hans-Knöll-Str. 10, D-07745 Jena, Germany; Laboratory of Geo-Information Science and Remote Sensing, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
2 Department for Biogeochemical Integration, Max-Planck-Institute for Biogeochemistry, Hans-Knöll-Str. 10, D-07745 Jena, Germany; CENSE, Departamento de Ciências e Engenharia do Ambiente, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Caparica, Portugal
3 School of Geography and Earth Sciences and McMaster Center For Climate Change, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada
4 Faculty of Land and Food Systems, 2357 Main Mall, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6T 1Z4, Canada
5 Laboratory of Geo-Information Science and Remote Sensing, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
6 ETH Zurich, Department of Environmental Systems Sciences, LFW C56, Universitätstrasse 2, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
7 European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Directorate for Sustainable Resources, Ispra, Italy
8 Department of Geography, Environment and Spacial Sciences, Center for Global Change and Earth Observations, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48823, United States of America
9 Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1225 W Dayton St, Madison, WI 53711, United States of America
10 Department of Biology, University of Virginia Commonwealth, 1000 W. Cary Street, Richmond, VA 23284-2012, United States of America
11 Department of Matters and Energy Fluxes, Global Change Research Institute CAS, Belidla 4a, 60300 Brno, Czech Republic
12 Department for Biogeochemical Integration, Max-Planck-Institute for Biogeochemistry, Hans-Knöll-Str. 10, D-07745 Jena, Germany
13 Bioclimatology, University of Göttingen, Büsgenweg 2, D-37077 Göttingen, Germany
14 Wageningen Environmental Research (Alterra), PO Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
15 328 Richardson Hall, College of Forestry, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331-5752, United States of America
16 Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund University, Sölvegatan 12, SE-22362 Lund, Sweden
17 Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, United States of America; Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, United States of America
18 CIRAD, UMR Eco&Sols, LMI IESOL, B.P. 1386 CP 18524, Dakar, Senegal; Eco&Sols, University Montpellier, CIRAD, INRA, IRD, Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France
19 Department of Atmospheric Environmental Research, Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Kreuzeckbahnstr. 19, D-82467 Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany
20 A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119071, Leninsky pr.33, Moscow, Russia
21 Université catholique de Louvain, Earth and Life Institute, Environmental Sciences, Croix du sud 2 L7.05.09, B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium