1. Introduction
The terrestrial orchid genus Nervilia contains approximately 65 species which are mostly found in tropical and subtropical Africa, Asia, Australia, and the Southwest Pacific Islands [1]. The herbal plant Nervilia concolor (Blume) Schltr. (Orchidaceae) (syn. N. aragoana) is regionally distributed in Dak Lak, KonTum, An Giang, and Dong Nai provinces of Vietnam. This plant is widely used in traditional Chinese medicine for a variety of diseases, such as bronchitis, stomatitis, acute pneumonia, and laryngitis [2,3,4,5,6]. As of 2019, phytochemical studies undertaken on Nervilia species have led to the identification of ca. 60 compounds, mostly including flavonoids (>20), a dozen terpenes, and some sterols and amino acids. Nevertheless, as far as can be ascertained, N. concolor (syn. N. aragoana) has not been studied from a chemical perspective so far. This article describes the isolation and structural elucidation of two new cycloartane glycosides, namely, nervisides I–J (1–2), from this plant source. Consistent with previously reported structures of Nervilia species, these natural products reveal an unconventional side chain bearing an alkyl substituent at C-24, the absolute configuration of which has been difficult to assign, often leading to an undetermined configuration of this stereogenic center in structurally related compounds, including nervisides A–H isolated from Nervilia fordii [7,8], which were not defined as to this carbon. Such C-24 hydroxymethylated cycloartanes were also repeatedly reported to occur within Passiflora species [9,10,11]. In this study, besides benefitting from an extensive set of NMR and HRESIMS analyses, C-24 configuration was determined based on GIAO NMR shift calculation of the two possible epimers and the subsequent DP4 probability score, leading to the assignment of a 24R configuration with a quantifiable confidence of 99.2%.
2. Results and Discussion
Compound 1 was obtained as a white gum. Its molecular formula was determined to be C36H60O10 based on the deprotonated molecular ion at m/z 651.4103 (calcd for C36H59O10, 651.4114). The 13C NMR spectrum, in conjunction with the HSQC spectrum, revealed 36 carbon signals, of which 31 could be assigned to a triterpenoid sapogenol core and 5 belonged to a monosaccharide unit. The 31 carbon resonances of the aglycone part consisted of 6 methyl carbons; 11 methylene carbons, 1 of which was oxygenated; 8 methine carbons, 3 of which bore oxygen functionalities; and 7 quaternary carbons comprising 1 carbonyl and an oxygenated carbon. Both the 1H upfield methylenic protons at δH 0.36 and 0.56 (each 1H, doublet with J = 4.0 Hz) and the six unsaturation degrees of the aglycone moiety led to define a carboxylic-acid-substituted cycloartane scaffold [12,13] (Figure 1 and Supplementary Materials). The thorough analysis of the COSY, HSQC, and HMBC spectra led to fully assign the 1H and 13C signals for compound 1 (Table 1). In the A-ring, a methyl and a carboxylic acid group could be assigned at C-4 (δC 53.0) based on HMBC correlations of both oxymethine H-3 (δH 4.40) and methyl H3-29 (δH 0.97) to carbons C-4 and C-28 (δC 178.5) as well as the HMBC cross-peak of H3-29 and C-3 (δC 78.8) (Figure 2). A hydroxy group could be anchored at C-1 based on HMBC cross-peaks of H2-19, H-3, and H-5 to C-1 and of H-1 (δH 3.34) to C-2 (δC 36.1), C-3 (δC 78.8), and C-5 (δC 36.6). A deshielded signal assigned to H-1 eq., partly overlapped with the water signal, resonated at 3.34 ppm as a broad singlet, diagnostic of the occurrence of a α-hydroxy group owing to the lack of a trans-diaxial coupling constant [14]. The H-3 signal appeared as a double doublet owing to diaxial (J = 12.0 Hz) and axial–equatorial coupling (J = 4.5 Hz) defining its axial orientation [9,15,16]. The glycosylation shift at C-3 (δC 78.8) of the aglycone indicated that the monosaccharide was linked at this specific position, as further backed up by the long-range heteronuclear correlation from H-1′ to C-3. The δ 2.5–4.5 ppm region of the 1H NMR spectrum validated the occurrence of a single saccharide, which could be directly identified as a xylopyranose unit based on the diagnostic triplet signal for the H-5′ α-proton at 2.97 ppm [14]. The COSY spectrum revealed the correlations of all the protons in the xylopyranose ring, and the magnitude of the vicinal coupling constant values were in excellent agreement with formerly reported J values for β-
Compound 2, obtained as a white amorphous solid, gave a molecular formula of C38H62O11 based on its negative-ion mode HRESIMS data, which displayed a [M–H]− peak at m/z 693.4215 (calcd for C38H61O11, 693.4219). This hinted that 2 differed from 1 by a supplementary acetyl group. Accordingly, both the 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopic data were very similar between the two compounds, but the 1H NMR spectrum of 2 revealed one more methyl group resonating at δH 1.99 (3H, s), while the 13C NMR spectrum exhibited one more carbonyl carbon at δC 170.3. The occurence of an acetyl group was deduced from the HMBC correlation originating from the methyl proton at δH 1.99 to carbonyl carbon C-32 at δC 170.3. The thorough analysis of the 2D NMR spectra determined a similar cycloartane glycoside core as in compound 1 except for the acetylation of the hydroxy group at C-31, further backed up by the key HMBC correlation from H2-31 (3.88 and 3.84) to C-32. An identical C-24 R configuration was assigned based on the good agreement between the carbon signals due to C-23, C-24, and C-25 and biogenetic considerations. From the above evidence, compound 2, namely nerviside J, was established as 3β-O-
In this study, compounds 1–2 were evaluated for their cytotoxicity against K562 (chronic myelogenous leukemia) and MCF-7 (breast cancer) cell lines. Both compounds 1 and 2 exerted moderate activity against these two cancer cell lines, with respective IC50 values of 20.5 (±0.2) and 20.6 (±0.1) µg/mL for 1 and 40.1 (±0.6) and 90.5 (±3.5) µg/mL for 2.
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. General
NMR spectra were performed on a Bruker AM500 FT-NMR spectrometer (500 MHz for 1H NMR and 125 MHz for 13C NMR). The ESI-HRMS data were generated with a Bruker MicroTOF-QII spectrometer (Bremen, Germany). Open-column chromatography was performed on silica gel 40–63 µm phase (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and reversed-phase C18 (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). TLC analyses were carried out on precoated silica gel 60 F254 (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), and spots were visualized by spraying the plates with 10% H2SO4 solution followed by heating.
3.2. Plant Material
N. concolor whole plants were collected in the Cu M’gar district, Dak Lak province, from August to November 2017 and authenticated by Dr. Cong-Luan Tran, Research Center of Ginseng and Medicinal Materials of Ho Chi Minh City National Institute of Medicinal Materials. A voucher specimen (no. NA-0621) was deposited in the Bioactive Compounds Laboratory, Institute of Chemical Technology.
3.3. Extraction and Isolation
The dried whole plants (4.0 kg) were milled prior to being extracted with 96% EtOH three times (3 × 30 L, each 8 h) at room temperature. The filtered solution was concentrated in vacuo to afford a crude extract (280 g). This dried residue was successively re-extracted using solvents of increasing polarities: n-hexane (H, 110 g), CHCl3 (C, 25 g), EtOAc (EA, 90 g), and H2O (W, 45 g). Extract EA was subjected to silica gel column chromatography and eluted with a chloroform/MeOH solvent system (stepwise, 1:0 to 1:0) to afford seven fractions: E1–E7. Fraction E5 (20 g) was selected for further purification using column chromatography based on a CHCl3–MeOH solvent system gradient (20:1 to 1:1) to yield five subfractions (E5.1–5.5). Subfraction E5.1 (1.1 g) was subjected to silica gel column chromatography using an isocratic mobile phase consisting of a CHCl3/MeOH/H2O solvent system (10:1:0.1) to afford 1 (10 mg) and 2 (14 mg).
Nerviside I (1). White gum. 1H- and 13C NMR see Table 1; HRESIMS m/z 651.4103 [M–H]− (calcd for C36H59O10, 651.4114).
Nerviside J (2). White amorphous solid 1H- and 13C NMR see Table 1; HRESIMS m/z 693.4215 [M–H]− (calcd for C38H61O11−, 693.4219).
3.4. Computational Chemistry
Truncated models of 1 (without the sugar moiety) and its epimer were assembled and the cycloartane skeleton was arranged in both with a conformation identical to that found in [30,31,32]. A conformation search was then performed on the overall structure using the basin hopping method [33] with the MMFF94 force field [34] as implemented in the scan program from the Tinker v8.6.1 software package [35,36,37]. Coordinates of the lowest energy minimum for both epimers were then further truncated by keeping only rings C and D and optimized at the B3LYP/6-31G(d) level [38,39,40] using the Gaussian 16 software package [41]. Vibrational analysis within the harmonic approximation was performed at the same level of theory upon geometrical optimization convergence prior to characterizing local minima by the absence of imaginary frequency. Chemical shifts were deduced from NMR shielding tensors calculated using the GIAO method [42,43] and corrected against values for the corresponding nucleus in TMS, both at the same level of theory. DP4 probability values were calculated using online implementation available from
3.5. Biological Assays
Cytotoxic activities of the formerly unreported metabolites were evaluated against the MCF-7 (breast cancer) and K562 (chronic myelogenous leukemia) tumor cell lines. These two cell lines were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium or in DMEM medium, respectively; supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 IU/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin; and maintained at 37 °C and 5% CO2 with 95% humidity. Viable cells were counted and inoculated in a 96-well plate with a density of 104 cells/100 μL/well for MCF-7 and 105 cells/100 μL/well for K562. After 24 h, the cells were treated with the compounds and doxorubicin (positive control) diluted in culture media at 100, 50, 25, 12.5, 6.25, 3.125, and 0 µg/mL concentration containing 1%, 0.5%, 0.25%, 0.125%, 0.0625%, 0.03125%, and 0% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), respectively. DMSO in culture media was used as a negative control. In addition, culture medium without cells was used as a blank. All experiments were done in triplicate. The plates were incubated in 5% CO2 with 95% humidity at 37 °C for 72 h. Ten microliters of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT, 5 mg/mL stock solution) were added to each well and incubated in 37 °C in 5% CO2 for 3.5 h. Seventy microliters of detergent reagent (10% SDS) were added to each well and the plate was maintained in 37 °C for 16 h. The optical density of each well was read by using a scanning multiwall spectrophotometer (Sunrise) at a wavelength of 595 nm. Cell survival was measured as the percentage absorbance compared to the negative control (DMSO-treated cells).
4. Conclusions
The ethnopharmacological relevance of N. concolor paved the way for the currently reported phytochemical investigation that resulted in the isolation and structural elucidation of two new C-24 alkyl-substituted cycloartane glycosides, namely, nervisides I–J. While unconventional side-chain-bearing triterpenes and sterols have regularly been reported from Nervilia species, these compounds are the first nervisides having a defined C-24 absolute configuration, deduced from a DP4-based computational chemistry approach.
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online. 1H, 13C NMR, HMBC, and HRMS spectra for 1–2, DFT calculations results for 24R and 24S epimers of 1 and 13C NMR spectroscopic data for 1, Atomic coordinates of nerviside I (1) and its 24S epimer.
Author Contributions
D.-T.M., C.-L.T. and T.-H.D. conceived and designed the experiments; T.-N.-M.T. and T.-P.N. performed the isolation work; T.-H.D., J.S., V.-K.N. and P.L.P. analyzed NMR data; M.A.B., G.B. and P.L.P. designed and performed DFT-NMR calculations; H.-H.N., P.-V.D. and N.-M.-A.T. performed the biological activity; and D.-T.M., P.L.P. and T.-H.D. wrote the manuscript. All the authors reviewed and validated the present manuscript prior to its being submitted.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Acknowledgments
Leo Gohrs from Alionis is thanked for the donation of computing hardware.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
Footnotes
Sample Availability: Sample of compounds 1 and 2 are not available from the authors.
Figures and Table
Table 113C and 1H NMR spectroscopic data (125/500 MHz) for 1–2 in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)-d6 (δ in ppm).
1 | 2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
δC | δH (J, Hz) | δC | δH (J, Hz) | |
1 | 70.8 | 3.34, 1H, br s | 70.7 | 3.34, 1H, br s |
2 | 36.1 | 1.84, 1H, m |
36.0 | 1.84, 1H, m |
3 | 78.8 | 4.40, 1H, dd, 12.0, 4.5 | 78.8 | 4.40, 1H, dd, 12.0, 4.5 |
4 | 53.0 | _ | 52.9 | _ |
5 | 36.6 | 2.41, 1H, dd, 13.0, 4.5 | 36.5 | 2.42,1H, dd, 12.5, 3.5 |
6 | 22.0 | 1.14, 1H, m |
21.9 | 1.16, 1H, m |
7 | 25.1 | 1.02, 2H, m | 25.0 | 1.02, 2H, m |
8 | 47.5 | 1.43, 1H, m | 47.3 | 1.46, 1H, m |
9 | 20.1 | - | 19.9 | - |
10 | 28.9 | - | 28.7 | |
11 | 25.0 | 2.27, 1H, m |
24.9 | 2.27, 1H, m |
12 | 32.6 | 1.55–1.57, 2H, m | 32.8 | 1.56–1.60, 2H, m |
13 | 44.8 | - | 44.7 | - |
14 | 48.7 | - | 48.6 | - |
15 | 35.3 | 1.21–1.22, 2H, m | 35.2 | 1.26–1.29, 2H, m |
16 | 27.8 | 1.84, 1H, m |
27.6 | 1.84, 1H, m |
17 | 51.9 | 1.54, 1H, m | 51.6 | 1.57, 1H, m |
18 | 18.0 | 0.91, 3H, s | 17.8 | 0.90, 3H, m |
19 | 28.8 | 0.36, 1H, d, 4.0 |
28.7 | 0.35, 1H, d, 4.0 |
20 | 36.4 | 1.26, 1H, m | 36.0 | 1.29, 1H, m |
21 | 18.3 | 0.82, 3H, s | 18.2 | 0.85, 3H, s |
22 | 29.0 | 1.43, 1H, m |
29.0 | 1.45, 1H, m |
23 | 30.8 | 1.43, 1H, m |
30.9 | 1.45, 1H, m |
24 | 74.6 | - | 73.4 | _ |
25 | 32.3 | 1.70, 1H, m | 32.4 | 1.72, 1H, m |
26 | 17.1 | 0.80–0.82, 3H, m | 16.8 | 0.80–0.85, 3H, m |
27 | 17.1 | 0.80–0.82, 3H, m | 16.7 | 0.80–0.85, 3H, m |
28 | 178.5 | 178.6 | ||
29 | 9.5 | 0.97, 3H, s | 9.5 | 0.97, 3H, s |
30 | 19.1 | 0.89, 3H, s | 19.0 | 0.91, 3H, s |
31 | 64.7 | 3.25, 2H, m | 66.9 | 3.89, 1H, d, 11.0 |
1’ | 104.1 | 4.14, 1H, d, 7.5 | 104.0 | 4.15, 1H, d, 7.5 |
2’ | 73.7 | 2.88, 1H, dd, 9.0, 7.5 | 73.5 | 2.88, 1H, t, 8.5 |
3’ | 76.4 | 3.05, 1H, t, 9.0 | 76.3 | 3.06, 1H, t, 8.5 |
4’ | 69.6 | 3.23, 1H, m | 69.5 | 3.24, 1H, m |
5’ | 65.7 | 3.66, 1H, dd, 11.5, 5.0 | 65.6 | 3.66, 1H, dd, 11.0, 5.0 |
2.97, 1H, t, 11.5 | 2.97, 1H, t, 11.0 | |||
OAc | 20.7 | 1.99, 3H, s | ||
170.3 |
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2019 by the authors.
Abstract
Two new cycloartane glycosides, nervisides I–J, were isolated from Nervilia concolor whole plants. Their structures were unambiguously established by interpretation of their HRESIMS and 1D and 2D NMR data. These cycloartanes comprised a stereogenic center at C-24, the R configuration of which was assigned based on DFT-NMR calculations and the subsequent DP4 probability score. These compounds were tested for cytotoxicity against K562 and MCF-7 tumor cell lines, revealing mild cytotoxic activity.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 Graduate University of Science and Technology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, 18 Hoang Quoc Viet, Cau Giay, Ha Noi 100803, Vietnam; Institute of Applied Sciences, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (HUTECH), 475 A Dien Bien Phu Street, Ward 25, Binh Thanh District, Ho Chi Minh City 758307, Viet Nam
2 Équipe “Pharmacognosie–Chimie des Substances Naturelles”, BioCIS, Univ. Paris-Sud, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, 5 Rue Jean-Baptiste Clément, 92290 Châtenay-Malabry, France
3 Graduate University of Science and Technology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, 18 Hoang Quoc Viet, Cau Giay, Ha Noi 100803, Vietnam; Institute of Chemical Technology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, 01 Mac Dinh Chi, Ho Chi Minh City 758307, Vietnam
4 Center of Excellence in Natural Products Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Pathumwan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
5 Faculty of Science and Technology, Thammasat University Lampang Campus, Lampang 52190, Thailand
6 Graduate University of Science and Technology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, 18 Hoang Quoc Viet, Cau Giay, Ha Noi 100803, Vietnam; Mien Dong University of Technology, MUT, Dong Nai Provine 813847, Vietnam
7 Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (HCMUT), Ho Chi Minh City 758307, Vietnam
8 Industrial University of Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City 758307, Vietnam
9 Faculty of Biotechnology, Nguyen Tat Thanh University, 300A Nguyen Tat Thanh Str., Dist. 4, Ho Chi Minh City 758307, Vietnam
10 Department for Management of Science and Technology Development, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 758307, Vietnam; Faculty of Applied Sciences, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 758307, Vietnam