It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Current state-of-the-art functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) offers remarkable imaging quality and resolution, yet, the intrinsic dimensionality of brain dynamics in different states (wakefulness, light and deep sleep) remains unknown. Here we present a method to reveal the low dimensional intrinsic manifold underlying human brain dynamics, which is invariant of the high dimensional spatio-temporal representation of the neuroimaging technology. By applying this intrinsic manifold framework to fMRI data acquired in wakefulness and sleep, we reveal the nonlinear differences between wakefulness and three different sleep stages, and successfully decode these different brain states with a mean accuracy across participants of 96%. Remarkably, a further group analysis shows that the intrinsic manifolds of all participants share a common topology. Overall, our results reveal the intrinsic manifold underlying the spatiotemporal dynamics of brain activity and demonstrate how this manifold enables the decoding of different brain states such as wakefulness and various sleep stages.
Rué-Queralt et al. present a method for calculating low dimensional manifolds in functional magnetic resonance imaging data and use it across human sleep-wake cycles. Their results indicate that non-REM sleep states occupy distinct areas of this intrinsic manifold and can be used to differentiate stages of sleep and waking.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Center of Brain and Cognition, Barcelona, Spain (GRID:grid.5612.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2172 2676)
2 University of Oxford, Centre for Eudaimonia and Human Flourishing, Oxford, UK (GRID:grid.4991.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8948); Aarhus University, Center for Music in the Brain, Aarhus, Denmark (GRID:grid.7048.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 1956 2722)
3 Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires and Physics Deparment (University of Buenos Aires), Buenos Aires, Argentina (GRID:grid.7345.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 0056 1981)
4 Goethe University, Department of Neurology and Brain Imaging Center, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (GRID:grid.7839.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9721); Christian-Albrechts-University, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany (GRID:grid.9764.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2153 9986)
5 Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Center of Brain and Cognition, Barcelona, Spain (GRID:grid.5612.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2172 2676); Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avancats (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain (GRID:grid.425902.8) (ISNI:0000 0000 9601 989X); Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Department of Neuropsychology, Leipzig, Germany (GRID:grid.419524.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 0041 5028); Monash University, School of Psychological Sciences, Melbourne, Australia (GRID:grid.1002.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7857)