It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
As computed tomography and related technologies have become mainstream tools across a broad range of scientific applications, each new generation of instrumentation produces larger volumes of more-complex 3D data. Lagging behind are step-wise improvements in computational methods to rapidly analyze these new large, complex datasets. Here we describe novel computational methods to capture and quantify volumetric information, and to efficiently characterize and compare shape volumes. It is based on innovative theoretical and computational reformulation of volumetric computing. It consists of two theoretical constructs and their numerical implementation: the spherical wave decomposition (SWD), that provides fast, accurate automated characterization of shapes embedded within complex 3D datasets; and symplectomorphic registration with phase space regularization by entropy spectrum pathways (SYMREG), that is a non-linear volumetric registration method that allows homologous structures to be correctly warped to each other or a common template for comparison. Together, these constitute the Shape Analysis for Phenomics from Imaging Data (SAPID) method. We demonstrate its ability to automatically provide rapid quantitative segmentation and characterization of single unique datasets, and both inter-and intra-specific comparative analyses. We go beyond pairwise comparisons and analyze collections of samples from 3D data repositories, highlighting the magnified potential our method has when applied to data collections. We discuss the potential of SAPID in the broader context of generating normative morphologies required for meaningfully quantifying and comparing variations in complex 3D anatomical structures and systems.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 University of California San Diego, Institute for Engineering in Medicine, Center for Scientific Computation in Imaging, La Jolla, USA (GRID:grid.266100.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 2107 4242); University of California San Diego, Department of Radiology, Center for Functional MRI, La Jolla, USA (GRID:grid.266100.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 2107 4242)
2 University of Texas, Department of Geological Sciences, Jackson School of Geosciences, Austin, USA (GRID:grid.55460.32) (ISNI:0000000121548364)
3 Duke University, Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, Chapel Hill, USA (GRID:grid.26009.3d) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7961)
4 Ohio University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Athens, USA (GRID:grid.20627.31) (ISNI:0000 0001 0668 7841)
5 University of California San Diego, Institute for Engineering in Medicine, Center for Scientific Computation in Imaging, La Jolla, USA (GRID:grid.266100.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 2107 4242)