It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Recent advances in molecular and synthetic biology are enabling the engineering of gene drives that spread genes of interest through interbreeding populations at a frequency greater than the rate expected by simple Mendelian inheritance. At present, insects represent the most likely cases of gene drive modified organisms for deliberate release into the environment. Through an open workshop, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) aimed to engage with stakeholders to discuss potential environmental risks associated with the deliberate release into the environment of gene drive modified insects. Workshop participants were invited to contribute to an example problem formulation to: (1) identify relevant broad protection goals and make them operational for use in environmental risk assessment; (2) formally devise examples of plausible pathways to harm that describe how the deployment of gene drive modified insects could be harmful; (3) formulate example risk hypotheses about the likelihood and severity of such events; (4) identify possible information that would be useful to test these risk hypotheses; and (5) identify how to acquire new data for hypothesis testing when existing information is deemed insufficient for regulatory decision-making. The problem formulation exercise was run for two hypothetical case studies (i.e. self-sustaining low threshold gene drives to control disease-spreading mosquitoes (Aedes albopictus, the Asian tiger mosquito) and agricultural pests (Drosophila suzukii, the spotted-wing Drosophila)). Points raised by the workshop participants reveal different often contrasting opinions/perspectives toward gene drive and their risk assessment. Overall, there was agreement that the problem formulation process is fit-for-purpose for the environmental risk assessment of gene drive modified insects, but it was acknowledged that practical challenges may be encountered. Points raised by the workshop participants, on defining protection goals, formulating specific pathways to harm and on structuring risks, have been considered by EFSA's Panel on genetically modified organisms during its deliberations.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer