It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Bacterial phytochrome photoreceptors usually belong to two-component signaling systems which transmit environmental stimuli to a response regulator through a histidine kinase domain. Phytochromes switch between red light-absorbing and far-red light-absorbing states. Despite exhibiting extensive structural responses during this transition, the model bacteriophytochrome from Deinococcus radiodurans (DrBphP) lacks detectable kinase activity. Here, we resolve this long-standing conundrum by comparatively analyzing the interactions and output activities of DrBphP and a bacteriophytochrome from Agrobacterium fabrum (Agp1). Whereas Agp1 acts as a conventional histidine kinase, we identify DrBphP as a light-sensitive phosphatase. While Agp1 binds its cognate response regulator only transiently, DrBphP does so strongly, which is rationalized at the structural level. Our data pinpoint two key residues affecting the balance between kinase and phosphatase activities, which immediately bears on photoreception and two-component signaling. The opposing output activities in two highly similar bacteriophytochromes suggest the use of light-controllable histidine kinases and phosphatases for optogenetics.
The bacteriophytochrome DrBphP from Deinococcus radiodurans shows high sequence homology to the histidine kinase Agp1 from Agrobacterium fabrum but lacks kinase activity. Here, the authors structurally and biochemically analyse DrBphP and Agp1, showing that DrBphP is a light-activatable phosphatase.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details









1 University of Helsinki, Faculty of Medicine, Anatomy, Helsinki, Finland (GRID:grid.7737.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 0410 2071)
2 University of Jyvaskyla, Department of Biological and Environmental Science, Nanoscience Center, Jyvaskyla, Finland (GRID:grid.9681.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 1013 7965)
3 University of Jyvaskyla, Department of Chemistry, Nanoscience Center, Jyvaskyla, Finland (GRID:grid.9681.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 1013 7965)
4 Lehrstuhl für Biochemie, Universität Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany (GRID:grid.7384.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 0467 6972)
5 Department of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden (GRID:grid.8761.8) (ISNI:0000 0000 9919 9582)
6 Tampere University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, BioMediTech, Tampere, Finland (GRID:grid.502801.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 2314 6254); Fimlab Laboratories, Tampere, Finland (GRID:grid.511163.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 0518 4910)
7 University of Helsinki, Faculty of Medicine, Anatomy, Helsinki, Finland (GRID:grid.7737.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 0410 2071); University of Jyvaskyla, Department of Biological and Environmental Science, Nanoscience Center, Jyvaskyla, Finland (GRID:grid.9681.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 1013 7965)