It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Objective
To understand the perceptions and attitudes of general practitioners (GPs) regarding children with an Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD).
DesignPhenomenological qualitative study.
SettingThree focus groups, clinical settings.
SubjectsFrench GPs.
Main outcome measures22 GPs took part in the study divided among three focus groups. They were volunteers to participate. Data were transcribed verbatim and analysed using a grounded theory data analysis, completed with a semiopragmatic analysis.
ResultsRepresenting autism as a strange disorder in the doctor–patient relationship, GPs perceive a loss of sensory contact with the child with ASD that prevents the usual professional relationship between doctor and patient. They disengage themselves from monitoring the subject, concentrating on supporting the family. According to them, their role was to refer the patient to a specialist in the case of clinical intuition, but they have several reasons to give themselves time, all the more so because once the diagnosis is made, they lose sight of the patient and their place in the care pathway. GPs expressed the need to acquire skills and strategies to communicate with the autistic child to recover their role and values.
ConclusionGPs are disconcerted by the idea of communicating with children with ASD, as it takes them out of their usual professional benchmarks. They need communication tools that enable them to regain their role and relational value of the patient-centred approach. Beyond this, the question of the ‘ethics of care’ of the patient with a joint attention disorder is raised.
- KEY POINTS
GPs are disconcerted with the idea of communicating with children with ASD.
GPs need communication tools that enable them to regain their role and relational value of the patient-centred approach.
The question of the ‘ethics of care’ of the patient with a joint attention disorder is raised.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Department of General Practice, Montpellier University, Montpellier, France; Institut Desbrest d’Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (IDESP), Montpellier University, Montpellier, France
2 Laënnec General Practice Center, Trèbes, France
3 Department of General Practice, Montpellier University, Montpellier, France; Institut Desbrest d’Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (IDESP), Montpellier University, Montpellier, France; Avicenne Multiprofessional Health Centre, Cabestany, France
4 Department of General Practice, Montpellier University, Montpellier, France