Metal halide perovskites and perovskite-related materials possess unique lattice and electronic properties that endow them with promising applications in high-performance photovoltaics and optoelectronics.[1] For the low-dimensional (low-D) variants, their broadband emission covering the visible-light spectrum is particularly appealing for the next-generation solid-state lighting.[2] Various low-D hybrid metal halides exhibiting broadband emission have been developed in recent years, including 2D (CH3CH2NH3)4Pb3Br10−xClx,[3] 1D C4N2H14PbBr4,[4] and 0D (C9NH20)7(PbCl4)Pb3Cl11.[5] Among them, 1D compounds are increasingly attractive as potentially efficient broadband emitters with efficient carrier transport along the chain direction.[6] Owing to their quantum confinement and strong electron–phonon coupling, self-trapped excitons (STEs) could easily form and be stabilized at room temperature,[7] resulting the broadband emissions.[8] However, the emission efficiencies of 1D metal halides at ambient conditions are still unsatisfactory due to non-optimal exciton-phonon coupling. To achieve highly efficient broadband emissions from 1D metal halides, a better fundamental understanding of the luminescence mechanisms and structure–property relationships is needed.
As a thermodynamic variable, pressure provides an effective means to tune the atomic and electronic structures of materials, and subsequently the physical properties.[9] In combination with in situ characterization methods, high-pressure research can further our fundamental understandings of the unique properties in hybrid metal halides. Recently, numerous studies of pressure-induced and/or enhanced PL in metal halides have been reported,[10] while the microscopic mechanisms of the pressure effects are still lively debated. Our recent work has revealed that lattice compression stabilizes the STE states by increasing the exciton binding energy of 1D C4N2H14PbBr4, resulting in the enhanced PL efficiency.[11] Nevertheless, many questions remain to be answered, for example: 1) Is there an ideal level for STE binding energy or are there other parameters that can evaluate the emission performance better? 2) Is it possible to achieve the ultimate performance of 100% PLQY in 1D metal halides by regulating exciton-phonon coupling? Addressing these challenges needs suitable material systems with high tunability of both structure and properties as well as advanced regulation and in situ characterization methods.
In this work, we carefully selected a metal halide C5N2H16Pb2Br6 with a corrugated 1D structure which permits a high tunability (Figure 1a). Distinguished from other 1D metal halides, this material possesses several unique characteristics, such as a giant structural distortion and strong exciton–phonon coupling which give extremely large STE binding energy of 1.28 eV (vs 0.76 eV for C4N2H14PbBr4) and high energy for ground state.[4,12] By carefully regulating such a highly-distorted structure using pressure, here we have reached an unexplored structural region, which offers a rare opportunity to understand the structure–property relationship and also to achieve the ultimate performance. Impressively, significant enhancements in both PL intensity and lifetime were revealed, achieving a near-unity PLQY at a mild pressure below 3 GPa. By using in situ in-laboratory and synchrotron-based characterization methods along with first-principles calculations, we systematically elucidate the underlying mechanisms of these pressure-induced dramatic changes in electronic and optical properties. We further establish a quantitative relationship between the PL property and Huang–Rhys factor S in a series of 1D metal halides.[7] The S parameter provides a quantitative description of exciton–phonon coupling that assesses the interactions between STE states and ground states,[13] hence is more suitable for evaluating the STE emission performance.
Results and DiscussionIn situ PL spectroscopy and fluorescent imaging were conducted to explore the variations of emission property in the corrugated 1D C5N2H16Pb2Br6 under high pressure. At ambient conditions, C5N2H16Pb2Br6 exhibits a broadband emission peaked at 610 nm with a full width at half maximum of 160 nm, which is attributed to the radiative recombination of STEs.[12] During compression, the PL intensity of C5N2H16Pb2Br6 shows a remarkable enhancement and reaches a maximum at 2.9 GPa (Figure 1a). Subsequently, the PL intensity continuously drops from 3 to 5 GPa. Note that an anomalous secondary increase of PL appears at 5.5 GPa (Figure 1c,d). Since the bandgap of C5N2H16Pb2Br6 also exhibits a notable discontinued drop at a similar pressure range according to the in situ UV–vis absorption spectra (Figure S2, Supporting Information), a pressure-induced structural change is believed to occur and we will elaborate on it later. Figure 1d shows the normalized PL integrated intensity of C5N2H16Pb2Br6 as a function of pressure, where the maximum value at 2.9 GPa is more than one order of magnitude higher than that at ambient conditions. In addition, the fluorescent micrographs in Figure 1e exhibit the PL brightness variations with increasing pressure and an obvious emission color change at higher pressures. No obvious difference of emission property can be observed between the single crystal and powder sample of C5N2H16Pb2Br6 under high pressure. Finally, the emission of C5N2H16Pb2Br6 gradually vanishes with further compression, and quenches at above 8 GPa (Figure S3, Supporting Information).
Figure 1. a) Crystal structure of C5N2H16Pb2Br6 in comparison with C4N2H14PbBr4. The left panel shows the overall structures; the middle and right panels indicate the lack of linear PbBrPbBrPb bonding network along the 1D chain direction (red dash line) and the large octahedral distortion in C5N2H16Pb2Br6, respectively. b,c) Pressure-induced evolution of emission properties at different pressures. d) The normalized PL integrated intensity as a function of pressure. e) The fluorescent images at selected pressures under UV irradiation (360–390 nm).
To assess the high-pressure PL property more accurately, we further determined the PLQY under the giga-Pascal pressure scale. Detailed description of the method can be seen in the Supporting Information.[11] Figure 2a plots the PLQY of C5N2H16Pb2Br6 as a function of pressure. Impressively, the PLQY is promoted from the initial value of 10% to the maximum value close to 100% at 2.9 GPa. Besides, the dependence of PL intensity on the excitation power density was examined to rule out the possibility of the emission from defects.[3] As shown in Figures S4 and S5, Supporting Information, all the variations at different pressures can be linearly fitted by I = αPw, where Pw is the excitation laser power and α is the intensity coefficient.
Figure 2. a) The evaluation of PLQY of C5N2H16Pb2Br6 under high pressure. b) Time-resolved PL spectra at different pressures. The solid lines are the biexponential fits of the decay dynamics. c) The change of average PL lifetime during compression. d) Pressure dependence of radiative (triangle) and non-radiative (square) carrier recombination rates.
Such a significant enhancement of PLQY is related to the variations of atomic and electronic structures of C5N2H16Pb2Br6. We first traced the change of carrier dynamics which can be revealed by in situ time-resolved photoluminescence (trPL) spectroscopy. Figure 2b and Figure S6, Supporting Information, show the trPL spectra of C5N2H16Pb2Br6 at different pressures. We applied biexponential function, I(t) = I0 [A1·exp(-t/τ1) + A2·exp(-t/τ2)], to fit the PL decay dynamics (Table S1, Supporting Information), where I0 is the initial PL intensity, τ1 and τ2 are the slow- and fast-decay components, respectively, and A1 and A2 are the amplitude of two components. The pressure-dependence average PL lifetime τ is calculated by τ = (A1τ12 + A2τ22) / (A1τ1+ A2τ2). At ambient conditions, the average lifetime was determined to be 92 ns, which is in line with the reported value.[12] During compression, the lifetime enlarges by three times to 270 ns at 2 GPa, and then gradually decreases till 5 GPa where a second enhancement occurs (Figure 2c). Together with the pressure dependence of PLQY, the evolution of radiative (kr) and non-radiative (knr) recombination rates can be calculated as the average lifetime τ is determined by the reciprocal of the sum of radiative (kr) and non-radiative (knr) recombination rates, and the PLQY is the ratio of the radiative (kr) recombination rate to the sum of radiative (kr) and non-radiative (knr) recombination rates (detailed method can be found in the Supporting Information). As shown in Figure 2d, on the one hand, the radiative decay rate increases by three times from 1.08 × 106 s–1 at ambient conditions to 3.73 × 106 s–1 at 2.9 GPa. On the other hand, impressively, the non-radiative decay rate is almost completely suppressed at 2.9 GPa, which dominantly contributes to the dramatically enhanced PLQY. In addition, a wavelength-dependent trPL study on C5N2H16Pb2Br6 indicates that the broadband emission decay arises from a time-averaged single ensemble (Figure S7, Supporting Information).[14]
In situ synchrotron X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were carried out to explore the structural variations of C5N2H16Pb2Br6 under high pressure (Figure S8, Supporting Information). At ambient conditions, C5N2H16Pb2Br6 adopts a monoclinic P21/c structure with lattice parameters a = 7.4746(2) Å, b = 11.5691(2) Å, c = 20.9689(4) Å, and β = 95.405(2)°. The XRD data of C5N2H16Pb2Br6 were analyzed by Rietveld refinements (Figure S9 and Table S2, Supporting Information) and the detailed analysis and discussion can be seen in the Supporting Information. Briefly, the pressure-induced variations of lattice constants and unit-cell volumes are displayed in Figure S10, Supporting Information, where the anisotropic compressibility is due to the different ways of connection in the three directions. By fitting the unit-cell volume to the Birch–Murnaghan equation of state,[15] a volume collapse can be observed, which is a common feature for the isostructural transition.[16] The structural changes observed in the XRD results are also reflected in the pressure-dependent absorption spectra (Figure S2, Supporting Information), suggesting the significant effects of pressure on the atomic and electronic structures. In addition, the obtained electronic structures by density-functional theory calculations well reproduce the variation trend of experimental bandgaps (Figure S11, Supporting Information).
The broadband emission of 1D hybrid metal halides is originated from the stabilized STEs caused by strong exciton–phonon coupling. The emission efficiency depends profoundly on the depth of STEs, can neither be too shallow nor too deep. That is, if the excitons are easily de-trapped from the STE states, the STE emission would be inefficient;[8] while too deep STE would facilitate the phonon-assisted non-radiative recombination which also decreases the emission efficiency.[7] The case of C4N2H14PbBr4 reported in the previous work belongs to the former scenario;[11] in contrast, the case of highly distorted C5N2H16Pb2Br6 studied herein belongs to the latter scenario, whose STE binding energy is as high as 1.28 eV.[12] Huang–Rhys parameter S can be used to quantitatively describe the interaction of the STE state and GS and thus could elucidate the underlying mechanisms of pressure-induced PLQY evolution.[1d]
As shown in Figure 3 and Figure S12, Supporting Information, the S values of C5N2H16Pb2Br6 are determined by fitting the temperature-dependent PL property under various pressures. The detailed experimental description can be seen in the Supporting Information. The S parameter decreases monotonously from 54 at ambient pressure to 28 at 2.7 GPa (Figure 3e). We plotted the PLQY as a function of S parameter in Figure 3f. PLQY increases significantly with the decrease of S during compression, reaches the maximum at S = 28, and then decreases with a further decrease of S at higher pressures. The variation profile suggests an optimized S value that would lead to the highest PLQY of C5N2H16Pb2Br6. As far as we know, such a relationship has never been observed due to the limited tunability of other 1D metal halides. The highly distorted structure of C5N2H16Pb2Br6 enables to reach an otherwise unexplorable structural region, thus, provides more tuning possibilities for the better fundamental understanding and high performance (100% PLQY).
Figure 3. a,c) The temperature-dependent photoluminescence spectra and b,d) the corresponding fitted values of Huang–Rhys factor S for C5H16N2Pb2Br6 at 0 and 2.9 GPa. FWHM means the full width at half maximum of the PL spectra. e) Pressure-dependent variations of S factor. f) PLQY as a function of Huang–Rhys factor S.
The close relationship between the Huang–Rhys factor S and the STE emission efficiency can be further demonstrated in the 1D C4N2H14PbBr4, which has a less distorted structure and relatively low STE binding energy at ambient conditions (0.76 eV). Pressure promotes the broadband emission of C4N2H14PbBr4 by stabilizing the STE states, that is, increasing S. The S values were determined to be 19 and 27 at ambient pressure and 2.8 GPa (Figure 4a; Figure S13, Supporting Information), respectively. We plotted the S values and corresponding PLQY (20% and 90%) into Figure 4b, intriguingly, their relationship follows the same curve as revealed in C5N2H16Pb2Br6. The consistent S-PLQY relationship revealed for both C5N2H16Pb2Br6 and C4N2H14PbBr4 confirms the existence of an optimal exciton–phonon interaction, which leads to the highest PLQY in these 1D hybrid metal halides. It is worth noting that pressure has different effects on regulating the exciton–phonon coupling of these two material systems. Here we have identified that the governing parameter is not the pressure, but the Huang–Rhys factor S which is closely related to structural distortion and exciton–phonon coupling.
Figure 4. a) Huang–Rhys factor S values of various 1D hybrid metal halides at different pressures. TMEDA, DMEDA, TDMP, and DMPZ indicate C5N2H16Pb2Br6, C4N2H14PbBr4, C6N2H16PbBr4, and (C6N2H16)3Pb2Br10, respectively. b) The relationship between PLQY and S factor in 1D hybrid metal halides. c) Schematic illustration of the influence of the regulated S factor on exciton dynamics and emission property in the 1D hybrid metal halides (FE, free exciton state; GS, ground state; STE, self-trapped exciton state; S, Huang–Rhys factor). Strong phonon-assisted non-radiative decay exists when S is overly large (left panel, for the case of C5N2H16Pb2Br6 at ambient pressure); while too small S value destabilizes the STE states and weakens the broadband emission (right panel, for the case of C4N2H14PbBr4 at ambient pressure). By tuning the Huang–Rhys factor S to a suitable value, the maximum emission can be achieved (middle panel).
We further noticed the recently developed 1D metal halides C6N2H16PbBr4 with a PLQY of 45% and (C6N2H16)3Pb2Br10 with a PLQY of 12% at ambient conditions.[17] Their S values were also determined by fitting the temperature-dependent PL property (Figure S14, Supporting Information). We plotted the S values and corresponding PLQYs of 45% and 12% into Figure 4b. Impressively, the S-PLQY relationship of all these 1D hybrid metal halides collapse on the same curve, that regulating the Huang–Rhys factor S toward ≈28 leads to the highest PLQY.
Huang–Rhys parameter S could, therefore, serve as the figure of merit for evaluating and optimizing the STE emission that the ideal S value should be intermediate. On the one hand, The highly distorted structure and strong exciton-phonon coupling (with exciton binding energy of 1.28 eV) in C5N2H16Pb2Br6, expressed as the overly large S, rise the GS energy and thus lead to the crossover between STE state and GS as shown in the left panel of Figure 4c.[7] Consequently, the trapped excitons can easily annihilate by the phonon-assisted pathway, resulting in a high non-radiative recombination rate at ambient conditions. This is unfavorable for the efficient emission of STEs. With compression, the wavefunction overlap between the STE state and the GS reduces caused by the pressure-regulated exciton–phonon interaction (middle panel of Figure 4c), and therefore the phonon-assisted non-radiative decay of STEs is greatly suppressed (Figure 2d), giving rise to the high PLQY. On the other hand, the much weaker exciton–phonon coupling in C4N2H14PbBr4, expressed as a much smaller S at ambient pressure, brings unstable STEs and thus inefficient emission (right panel of Figure 4c). In this case, pressure promotes the broadband emission by stabilizing the STE states toward a suitable S value.
ConclusionUsing pressure to regulate the exciton–phonon coupling, a near-unity PLQY of STE-based broadband emission was obtained in a corrugated 1D hybrid metal halide C5N2H16Pb2Br6. The high tunability of this material enables to realize an otherwise unattainable feature for both property optimization and mechanism understanding. Compression effectively modulates the overly strong exciton–phonon interaction of C5N2H16Pb2Br6 to a suitable level and reduces the overlap between the STE states and the ground state, leading to the suppressed phonon-assisted non-radiative loss and thus the tenfold enhanced emission. By quantifying the exciton–phonon coupling using Huang–Rhys factor S, we have uncovered a quantitative relationship that regulating S factor toward 28 leads to the highest PLQY of this 1D metal halide. More importantly, the S–PLQY relationship of other 1D metal halides including C4N2H14PbBr4, C6N2H16PbBr4, and (C6N2H16)3Pb2Br10 follows the same curve, which further verifies the rationality of the newly revealed principle. This work not only achieves the ultimate performance of 100% PLQY in 1D hybrid metal halide but also quantitatively demonstrates the relationship between the exciton–phonon coupling and STE emission.
AcknowledgementsThis work was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Grant Nos. U1930401 and 51527801). H.L. and B.M. thank the support from the Air Force Office of Scientific Research under the contract No. FA9550-18-1-0231. Portions of this work were performed at GeoSoilEnviroCARS (The University of Chicago, Sector 13), Advanced Photon Source (APS), Argonne National Laboratory. GeoSoilEnviroCARS is supported by the National Science Foundation—Earth Sciences (EAR—1634415) and Department of Energy- GeoSciences (DE-FG02-94ER14466), and partially by COMPRES under NSF Cooperative Agreement EAR -1606856. Use of the GSECARS Raman Lab System was supported by the NSF MRI Proposal (EAR-1531583). This research used resources of the Advanced Photon Source, a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science User Facility operated for the DOE Office of Science by Argonne National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357. The authors appreciate the language editing by Editor Freyja O'Toole.
Conflict of InterestThe authors declare no conflict of interest.
Data Availability StatementResearch data are not shared.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Low-dimensional hybrid metal halides are emerging as a highly promising class of single-component white-emitting materials for their unique broadband emission from self-trapped excitons (STEs). Despite substantial progress in the development of these metal halides, many challenges remain to be addressed to obtain a better fundamental understanding of the structure–property relationship and realize the full potentials of this class of materials. Here, via pressure regulation, a near 100% photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) of broadband emission is achieved in a corrugated 1D hybrid metal halide C5N2H16Pb2Br6, which possesses a highly distorted structure with an initial PLQY of 10%. Compression reduces the overlap between STE states and ground state, leading to a suppressed phonon-assisted non-radiative decay. The PL evolution is systematically demonstrated to be controlled by the pressure-regulated exciton–phonon coupling which can be quantified using Huang–Rhys factor S. Detailed studies of the S-PLQY relation for a series of 1D hybrid metal halides (C5N2H16Pb2Br6, C4N2H14PbBr4, C6N2H16PbBr4, and (C6N2H16)3Pb2Br10) reveal a quantitative structure–property relationship that regulating S factor toward 28 leads to the maximum emission.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Center for High Pressure Science and Technology Advanced Research (HPSTAR), Shanghai, China
2 Department of Physics and Shenzhen Institute for Quantum Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
3 Hoffmann Institute of Advanced Materials, Shenzhen Polytechnic, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
4 State Key Laboratory of Molecular Reaction Dynamics and Dynamics Research Center for, Energy and Environmental Materials, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian, Liaoning, China
5 Hawaii Institute of Geophysics and Planetology, University of Hawaii Manoa, Honolulu, HI, USA
6 Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA