1. Introduction
Electromagnetic interference (EMI) has emerged as a major issue with the growth of electronic devices and components. EMI can cause not only the operational malfunction of electric devices but can also severely affect human health. The range of electronic devices and components is gradually increasing due to the commercialization of electric vehicles and, therefore, many researchers are developing EMI shielding materials [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17].
Carbon materials such as carbon fibers (CFs), carbon nanotubes (CNTs), carbon black, and graphene are continually being researched and developed for use in a variety of industrial applications including EMI shielding [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. As one of the most developed and critical reinforcements, CFs have excellent properties such as high strength, high modulus, low density, good chemical stability, and outstanding electrical conductivity. These properties make CFs suitable for use in materials such as aircrafts, automotive parts, and electrical equipment as electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding materials. However, as EMI shielding materials, CFs have weaknesses (e.g., poor magnetic properties) which must be improved in order to enable their wide application and performance improvement in the area of EMI shielding [30,31]. Soft magnetic materials such as Fe, Co, Ni, and alloys thereof have attracted considerable attention as EMI shielding materials due to their high magnetic properties. However, since these alloys have a high density, they not only increase the weight of the EM wave absorbing materials but are also low in dispersibility for use as reinforcements [32,33,34,35].
Hybrid materials containing carbon and soft magnetic materials have high potential for use as high-performance EMI shielding materials since they share the advantages of each material [36,37,38,39,40]. Thus, to hybridize carbon and soft magnetic materials, we prepared magnetic CFs by coating CFs with an FeCoNi alloy using an electroless plating method. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM), and a four-probe electric resistivity tester were employed to determine the morphologies, structural properties, magnetic properties, and volume resistivity of the magnetic CFs, respectively. EMI shielding properties of the magnetic CFs were investigated in the frequency range of 300 kHz to 3 GHz as a function of FeCoNi-plating time.
2. Experimental
2.1. Specimen Preparation
The CFs (T300, 3 K, plain weave, Toray Industries, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) examined in this study. Further information of the CFs is listed in Table 1. The density of CFs(T300) used for weaving is 1.76 g/m3. Magnetic CFs were prepared as follows (Figure 1a). The CFs were stirred into 10 wt.% nitric acid (HNO3) for 30 min to remove impurities. Prior to electroless FeCoNi-plating, the prepared CFs was treated in a tin chloride (SnCl2) and palladium chloride (PdCl2) activation solution to form Sn/Pd nuclei for magnetic metal (FeCoNi) reduction. The activated CFs were obtained by filtering and washing. The electroless plating solution was composed of source metal ions (FeSO4·7H2O, CoSO4·7H2O, NiSO4·7H2O (3:3:0.7)), metal chelators, and a reducing agent (borane dimethylamine complex). The pH of the plating solution was adjusted to 6.5 using sodium hydroxide. The FeCoNi-CFs were obtained by immersing the pretreated CFs for 5, 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min in the plating solution (temperature: 75 °C). Finally, the FeCoNi-CFs were cut to specific dimensions for EMI shielding effectiveness (SE) testing. The sample names are listed in Table 2.
2.2. Characterization
The morphologies of the FeCoNi-CFs were measured using field emission SEM (FE SEM, JSM-7100F, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The structure properties of these samples were examined by XRD (D2 PHASER, Bruker AXS, Karlsruhe, Germany) with Cu Kα radiation. The magnetic properties of the FeCoNi-CFs were measured using a Vibrating Sample Magnetometer (VSM, 7404, Lake Shore Cryotronics Inc., Westerville, OH, USA). The volume resistivities of the FeCoNi-CFs were measured according to JIS K 7194 at room temperature. The measuring instrument used a four-probe electrical resistivity tester (MCP-T700, Mitsubishi Chemical Co., Chigasaki, Japan) with an ASP type probe, and the power source condition was AC85-24V/47-63Hz/40VA. The EMI shielding properties of the FeCoNi-CFs were measured using a vector network analyzer (E5071C, Keysight Technologies, Santa Rosa, CA, USA) based on the ASTM ES-7 in the frequency range of 300 kHz to 3 GHz. The test set-up and sample dimension information are schematically shown in Figure 2. The test set-up consists of network analyzers, coaxial cable, and coaxial transverse electromagnetic (TEM) cells as a sample holder. The network analyzer was able to measure the incident, transmitted, and reflected powers of a sample.
The EMI shielding effectiveness (EMI SE) of the materials was evaluated by measuring the attenuation or reduction of electromagnetic waves and was calculated using the following equation [41]:
SE (dB) = 10 log (P1/P2)(1)
where P1 and P2 are the incident and transmitted powers, respectively.3. Results and Discussion
Figure 1b presents Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS) results and photographs of the FeCoNi-CFs as a function of plating time. The changes in elemental compositions and fabric color of the FeCoNi-CFs were confirmed after electroless plating. The metal content of FeCoNi-CFs increased with increasing FeCoNi-plating time. In the 60-FeCoNi-CFs, the total content of metal (FeCoNi) was the highest, which was nearly similar to the metal content of FeCoNi-CFs plated during 90 and 120 min. As clearly visible to the naked eye per the photographs of FeCoNi-CFs, 5- and 15-FeCoNi-CFs were not partially plated. These results revealed that a plating time of 30 min or more is required to coat the fabric in its entirety.
Figure 3 shows the SEM images of 5-,-FeCoNi-CFs, 15-,-FeCoNi-CFs, 30-,-FeCoNi-CFs, and 60-FeCoNi-CFs. As the plating time increased, the FeCoNi layers on the fabric surfaces gradually formed and the FeCoNi grain size also increased. However, the surface morphologies of 5-, 15-, and 30-FeCoNi-CFs indicated that the FeCoNi layer was not yet completely formed. By contrast, the surfaces morphologies of 60-FeCoNi-CFs revealed that the FeCoNi layers were homogeneously deposited on the surfaces of CFs. Figure 4 presents EDS-mapping images of 5- and 60-FeCoNi-CFs. In the figure, C, O, Fe, Co, and Ni are denoted as blue, red, purple, green, and khaki, respectively. The EDS-mapping images reveal a more accurate distribution of the metal layer formed on the CF surface. It appears that the 60-min plating led to a significant improvement in metal coating quality, which was also likely to affect the EMI shielding properties.
Figure 5 shows the XRD patterns of the FeCoNi-CFs as a function of plating time. All Fe-CoNi-CFs clearly exhibited peaks of (110), (200), and (211) planes of the FeCoNi BCC structure under various plating time conditions. It was confirmed that the FeCoNi structure peak became more pronounced as the plating time increased, and the crystallinity increased with the increase in the thickness of the plating layer as the particles were well aligned [42,43]. In the FeCoNi-CFs plated for more than 30 min, the (002) of the carbons was not observed, indicating that the carbon did not restack due to the FeCoNi layer grown on the fiber surface [44].
The magnetic properties of the FeCoNi-CFs, as a function of plating time, are shown in Figure 6a,b. The soft magnetic properties were enhanced with the increased plating time. The 5- and 15-FeCoNi-CFs exhibited significantly lower Ms and higher Hc than other samples. The Ms of 5- and 15-FeCoNi-CFs was approximately 9.2 and 11.2 emu/g, respectively, whereas the Hc of 5- and 15-FeCoNi-CFs was approximately 73.7 and 78.5 Oe, respectively. These results were considered to have derived from the formation of small-sized FeCoNi grains and uniform plating layers [45], as confirmed by SEM data. The Ms and Hc of 30-FeCoNi-CFs were 43.1 emu/g and 57.8 Oe, respectively. The magnetic properties of 30-FeCoNi-CFs were improved as compared to 5- and 15-FeCoNi-CFs. Of the samples, the best soft magnetic properties were obtained for 60-FeCoNi-CFs. The 60-FeCoNi-CFs had the highest Ms (103.2 emu/g) and lowest Hc (46.3 Oe) due to the fact that the FeCoNi grains were sufficiently large and the FeCoNi layers were uniformly generated. In addition, it was observed that the magnetic properties of 90- and 120-FeCoNi-CFs were lower than those of 60-FeCoNi-CFs, where the magnetic properties of the magnetic CFs were expected to affect EMI shielding properties.
Figure 6c shows the effect of FeCoNi-plating on the volume resistivity of magnetic CFs. It can be seen that the change in volume resistivity was similar to that of the magnetic properties. The volume resistivity of FeCoNi-CFs gradually decreased with the increase in plating time, indicating that uniformed FeCoNi layers can cause good surface conductivity for the FeCoNi-CFs [46]. This also means that the EMI shielding properties of FeCoNi-CFs can be enhanced by increasing the FeCoNi-plating time in this work.
Figure 6d shows the EMI shielding properties over the frequency range of 300 kHz to 3 GHz for the FeCoNi-CFs as a function of plating time. As Figure 5d shows, the EMI SE of the as-received CFs was approximately 49.2 dB at 1.5 GHz. All of the FeCoNi-CFs had a higher EMI SE than the as-received CFs. In addition, the EMI SE of FeCoNi-CFs was enhanced according to FeCoNi-plating time. In particular, the EMI SE of the FeCoNi-CFs was enhanced significantly up to the 60-FeCoNi-CFs (69.4 dB at 1.5 GHz), suggesting that the presence of an FeCoNi layer on the surface of CFs can enhance the EMI SE of the magnetic CFs. In the 90-FeCoNi-CFs and 120-FeCoNi-CFs, the EMI SE was reduced to 66.9 and 66.1 dB, respectively, at 1.5 GHz. This means that a metal content threshold can exist for the EMI SE, which indicates that a further increase in plating time is unnecessary. It seems that FeCoNi was separated from the surface after excessive plating. This can be confirmed through Figure 7. As confirmed in Figure 3 and Figure 4, the 60-FeCoNi-CF surface was once again uniformly or perfectly plated through Figure 7. On the other hand, in the case of the surface of 120-FeCoNi-CFs, it was confirmed that metal particles were either agglomerated to form a cluster, or the over-aggregated metal was separated from the fiber surface. This is probably due to the high magnetic affinity of FeCoNi. Also, EMI SE(dB) is converted to EMI Shielding efficiency (%) using Equation (2) as [47];
(2)
As a result of the calculation through Equation (2), The 60-FeCoNi-CFs exhibited outstanding EMI shielding efficiency (99.99999%) as shielding materials. The 60-FeCoNi-CFs exhibited higher magnetic properties than the other samples, and for EMI shielding materials, a previous study showed that high permeability increases the absorption behavior and improves the EMI shielding properties [48]. Therefore, we can expect additional EMI behaviors on the magnetic layer. This means that FeCoNi plays a major role in generating the additional EMI SE.
4. Conclusions
In this study, we prepared magnetic CFs fibers using electroless FeCoNi plating to enhance the EMI SE of FeCoNi-CFs. We also and investigated the effects of FeCoNi plating on the EMI SE. The formation of FeCoNi layers on CF surfaces were confirmed by EDS, SEM, and XRD studies, and the CF surfaces were successfully modified by electroless plating. Experimental results indicate that the magnetic properties, electrical conductivity, and EMI SE of FeCoNi-CFs were enhanced with increased plating time. The 60-FeCoNi-CFs showed an enhancement greater than 40% for the EMI SE as compared to the as-received CFs due to the presence of FeCoNi layers and the additional shielding effects of the FeCoNi-CFs as produced in this study.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, Y.-J.Y., H.G.K., and L.K.K.; methodology, Y.-J.Y., J.J.L., and A.T.; formal analysis, J.J.L.; investigation, J.J.L. and A.T.; resources, J.J.L. and S.H.G.; data curation, J.J.L., A.T., and S.H.G.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.-J.Y.; writing—review and editing, Y.-J.Y.; visualization, Y.-J.Y.; supervision, H.G.K. and L.K.K.; project administration, H.G.K. and L.K.K.; funding acquisition, H.G.K. and L.K.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (MOE) [No. 2016R1A6A1A03012069] and [No. 2020R1A2C1102174].
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available on reasonable request from the corresponding author.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the staff of the Institute of Carbon Technology for their support.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures and Tables
Figure 1. (a) Schematic diagram of the electroless FeCoNi-plating processes and (b) Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS) results and images based on pictures according to plating time.
Figure 4. EDS-mapping images showing the chemical elements (blue: C, red: O, violet: Fe, green: Co, and khaki: Ni) distributions of (a) 5-FeCoNi-CFs and (b) 60-FeCoNi-CFs.
Figure 6. (a) Hysteresis loops, (b) magnetization saturation (Ms) and coercivity (Hc), (c) volume resistivity, and (d) EMI SE effectiveness of as-received CFs and FeCoNi-CFs as a function of plating time.
Physical properties of carbon fibers.
Type | Carbon Fibers |
---|---|
Warp | T300–6000 |
Weft | T300–6000 |
Warp density (pc(s)/25 mm) | 10 |
Weft density (pc(s)/25 mm) | 10 |
Weave structure | plain |
Width (cm) | 100 |
Thickness (mm) | 0.3 |
Textile weight (g/m2) | 317 |
Descriptions of the samples.
Sample | Description |
---|---|
as-received CFs | as-received carbon fibers |
5-FeCoNi-CFs | 5-min FeCoNi-plated CFs |
15-FeCoNi-CFs | 15-min FeCoNi-plated CFs |
30-FeCoNi-CFs | 30-min FeCoNi-plated CFs |
60-FeCoNi-CFs | 60-min FeCoNi-plated CFs |
90-FeCoNi-CFs | 90-min FeCoNi-plated CFs |
120-FeCoNi-CFs | 120-min FeCoNi-plated CFs |
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2021 by the authors.
Abstract
In this study, soft magnetic metal was coated on carbon fibers (CFs) using an electroless FeCoNi-plating method to enhance the electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding properties of CFs. Scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, and a vibrating sample magnetometer were employed to determine the morphologies, structural properties, and magnetic properties of the FeCoNi-CFs, respectively. The EMI shielding behavior of the FeCoNi-CFs was investigated in the frequency range of 300 kHz to 3 GHz through vector network analysis. The EMI shielding properties of the FeCoNi-CFs were significantly enhanced compared with those of the as-received CFs. The highest EMI shielding effectiveness of the 60-FeCoNi-CFs was approximately 69.4 dB at 1.5 GHz. The saturation magnetization and coercivity of the 60-FeCoNi-CFs were approximately 103.2 emu/g and 46.3 Oe, respectively. This indicates that the presence of FeCoNi layers on CFs can lead to good EMI shielding due to the EMI adsorption behavior of the magnetic metal layers.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 Busan Textile Materials Research Center, Korea Dyeing and Finishing Technology Institute, Busan 46744, Korea;
2 Institute of Carbon Technology, Jeonju University, Jeonju 55069, Korea;
3 Institute of Carbon Technology, Jeonju University, Jeonju 55069, Korea;
4 Institute of Carbon Technology, Jeonju University, Jeonju 55069, Korea;