It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Predictability of human movement is a theoretical upper bound for the accuracy of movement prediction models, which serves as a reference value showing how regular a dataset is and to what extent mobility can be predicted. Over the years, the predictability of various human mobility datasets was found to vary when estimated for differently processed datasets. Although attempts at the explanation of this variability have been made, the extent of these experiments was limited. In this study, we use high-precision movement trajectories of individuals to analyse how the way we represent the movement impacts its predictability and thus, the outcomes of analyses made on these data. We adopt a number of methods used in the last 11 years of research on human mobility and apply them to a wide range of spatio-temporal data scales, thoroughly analysing changes in predictability and produced data. We find that spatio-temporal resolution and data processing methods have a large impact on the predictability as well as geometrical and numerical properties of human mobility data, and we present their nonlinear dependencies.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Wrocław University of Environmental of Life Sciences, Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformatics, Wrocław, Poland (GRID:grid.411200.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 0694 6014)
2 Wrocław University of Environmental of Life Sciences, Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformatics, Wrocław, Poland (GRID:grid.411200.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 0694 6014); University of Glasgow, Urban Big Data Centre, Glasgow, UK (GRID:grid.8756.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2193 314X); The University of Auckland, School of Environment, Auckland, New Zealand (GRID:grid.9654.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 0372 3343)
3 Université Catholique de Louvain, Institute of Communication Technologies, Electronics, and Applied Mathematics, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium (GRID:grid.7942.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2294 713X)
4 Spyrosoft S.A., Kraków, Poland (GRID:grid.7942.8)