It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Conventional ultrafine-grains can generate high strength in Mg alloys, but significant tradeoff of corrosion resistance due to inclusion of a large number of non-equilibrium grain boundaries. Herein, an ultrafine-grain structure consisting of dense ultrafine twins is prepared, yielding a high strength up to 469 MPa and decreasing the corrosion rate by one order of magnitude. Generally, the formation of dense ultrafine twins in Mg alloys is rather difficult, but a carefully designed multi-directional compression treatment effectively stimulates twinning nucleation within twins and refines grain size down to 300 nm after 12-passes compressions. Grain-refinement by low-energy twins not only circumvents the detrimental effects of non-equilibrium grain boundaries on corrosion resistance, but also alters both the morphology and distribution of precipitates. Consequently, micro-galvanic corrosion tendency decreases, and severe localized corrosion is suppressed completely. This technique has a high commercial viability as it can be readily implemented in industrial production.
Conventional ultrafine grains can generate high-strength Mg alloys, but non-equilibrium grain boundaries deteriorates their corrosion resistance. Here, the authors present ultrafine grained Mg alloys with dense twins that display high strength and reduced corrosion rate by one order of magnitude.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 Nanjing Tech University, Key Laboratory for Light-weight Materials, Nanjing, China (GRID:grid.412022.7) (ISNI:0000 0000 9389 5210); Institute of Corrosion Science and Technology, Guangdong, China (GRID:grid.412022.7)
2 Nanjing Tech University, Key Laboratory for Light-weight Materials, Nanjing, China (GRID:grid.412022.7) (ISNI:0000 0000 9389 5210)
3 RMIT University, School of Engineering, Carlton, Australia (GRID:grid.1017.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 2163 3550)
4 Chinese Academy of Sciences, Key Laboratory of Nuclear Materials and Safety Assessment, Institute of Metal Research, Shenyang, China (GRID:grid.9227.e) (ISNI:0000000119573309)
5 City University of Hong Kong, Department of Physics, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Kowloon, China (GRID:grid.35030.35) (ISNI:0000 0004 1792 6846)
6 Central South University, State Key Laboratory of Powder Metallurgy, Changsha, China (GRID:grid.216417.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 0379 7164)
7 Chongqing University, International Joint Laboratory for Light Alloys, College of Materials Science and Engineering, Chongqing, China (GRID:grid.190737.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 0154 0904)