It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) is associated with immunosuppression and patients are at increased clinical risk following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Covid-19 vaccines offer the potential for protection against severe infection but relatively little is known regarding the profile of the antibody response following first or second vaccination. We studied spike-specific antibody responses following first and/or second Covid-19 vaccination in 299 patients with CLL compared with healthy donors. 286 patients underwent extended interval (10–12 week) vaccination. 154 patients received the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine and 145 patients received ChAdOx1. Blood samples were taken either by venepuncture or as dried blood spots on filter paper. Spike-specific antibody responses were detectable in 34% of patients with CLL after one vaccine (n = 267) compared to 94% in healthy donors with antibody titres 104-fold lower in the patient group. Antibody responses increased to 75% after second vaccine (n = 55), compared to 100% in healthy donors, although titres remained lower. Multivariate analysis showed that current treatment with BTK inhibitors or IgA deficiency were independently associated with failure to generate an antibody response after the second vaccine. This work supports the need for optimisation of vaccination strategy in patients with CLL including the potential utility of booster vaccines.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 University of Birmingham, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, Birmingham, UK (GRID:grid.6572.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7486)
2 University of Birmingham, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, Birmingham, UK (GRID:grid.6572.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7486)
3 University of Birmingham, Institute of Applied Health Research, Birmingham, UK (GRID:grid.6572.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7486)
4 National infection Service, Public Health England, Porton Down, Salisbury, UK (GRID:grid.271308.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 5909 016X)
5 University of Birmingham, Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Birmingham, UK (GRID:grid.6572.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7486)
6 St. James’s University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK (GRID:grid.443984.6)
7 University Hospitals Birmingham, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK (GRID:grid.412563.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0376 6589)
8 University Hospitals Birmingham, Bordesley Green East, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, UK (GRID:grid.412563.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0376 6589)
9 University of Birmingham, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, Birmingham, UK (GRID:grid.6572.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7486); University Hospitals Birmingham, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK (GRID:grid.412563.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0376 6589)