It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Growing evidence suggests an association of lumbar paraspinal muscle morphology with low back pain (LBP) and lumbar pathologies. Unilateral spinal disorders provide unique models to study this association, with implications for diagnosis, prognosis, and management. Statistical shape analysis is a technique that can identify signature shape variations related to phenotypes but has never been employed in studying paraspinal muscle morphology. We present the first investigation using this technique to reveal disease-related paraspinal muscle asymmetry, using MRIs of patients with a single posterolateral disc herniation at the L5-S1 spinal level and unilateral leg pain. Statistical shape analysis was conducted to reveal disease- and phenotype-related morphological variations in the multifidus and erector spinae muscles at the level of herniation and the one below. With the analysis, shape variations associated with disc herniation were identified in the multifidus on the painful side at the level below the pathology while no pathology-related asymmetry in cross-sectional area (CSA) and fatty infiltration was found in either muscle. The results demonstrate higher sensitivity and spatial specificity for the technique than typical CSA and fatty infiltration measures. Statistical shape analysis holds promise in studying paraspinal muscle morphology to improve our understanding of LBP and various lumbar pathologies.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Concordia University, Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Montreal, Canada (GRID:grid.410319.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8630); Concordia University, PERFORM Centre, Montreal, Canada (GRID:grid.410319.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8630)
2 Concordia University, PERFORM Centre, Montreal, Canada (GRID:grid.410319.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8630); Concordia University, Health, Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, Montreal, Canada (GRID:grid.410319.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8630)
3 Western University, Department of Kinesiology, London, Canada (GRID:grid.39381.30) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8884)
4 Concordia University, PERFORM Centre, Montreal, Canada (GRID:grid.410319.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8630); Concordia University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Montreal, Canada (GRID:grid.410319.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8630)
5 Western University, Robarts Research Institute, London, Canada (GRID:grid.39381.30) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8884)
6 Western University, School of Physical Therapy and Western’s Bone and Joint Institute, London, Canada (GRID:grid.39381.30) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8884)