It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
COVID-19 has brought considerable changes and caused critical psychological responses, especially among frail populations. So far, researchers have explored the predictive effect of diverse factors on pandemic-related psychological distress, but none have focused on the impact of prior depression and anxiety symptomatology adopting an extended (10-year) longitudinal design. 105 patients aged over 60, affected by hypertension who participated in a previous longitudinal study were assessed through a follow-up telephone structured interview. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) were used for assessing depression and anxiety symptoms and the psychological impact of COVID-19, respectively. Multiple linear regression analyses were conducted. At the assessment, participants did not report clinically relevant depression, anxiety, and psychological pandemic-related distress symptoms. However, significant mean differences between baseline and current follow-up evaluations for both depression and anxiety were found, reflecting a decrease in symptomatology over time (p < .001). Baseline depression symptoms (β = 1.483, p = .005) significantly predicted the psychological impact of COVID-19 after 10 years. Conversely, their decrease (β = −1.640, p < .001) and living with others (β = −7.274, p = .041) significantly contributed to lower psychological distress scores. Our findings provide insight into the predisposing influence of depressive symptoms on pandemic-related psychological distress ten years later. Preventive interventions and strategies considering these factors are needed to better pre-empt the severe mental consequences of the pandemic.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Psychology, Milan, Italy (GRID:grid.7563.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 2174 1754)
2 University of Bergamo, Department of Human and Social Sciences, Bergamo, Italy (GRID:grid.33236.37) (ISNI:0000000106929556)
3 University of Florence, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Florence, Italy (GRID:grid.8404.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1757 2304); Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy (GRID:grid.24704.35) (ISNI:0000 0004 1759 9494)
4 CTO Hospital, Cardiac Rehabilitation Centre, Milan, Italy (GRID:grid.413186.9)
5 University of Milano-Bicocca, School of Medicine and Surgery, Milan, Italy (GRID:grid.7563.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 2174 1754); Ospedale Niguarda Ca’ Granda, Cardiology IV, “A. De Gasperis” Department, Milan, Italy (GRID:grid.416200.1)