It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Nowadays, sensory characteristics are considered as basic requirement for coffee quality, which determined its future commercial value. Gayo Arabica coffee is one of specialty coffees known by international buyers due to its unique taste and complex aroma. However, the sensory characteristics of gayo arabica coffee vary based on type of local varieties and the processing technique practiced. The present study aims to determine the effect of variety and processing methods towards physical and sensory properties of Gayo Arabica coffee. Four Gayo local varieties (Tim-tim, Borbor, Ateng Super and Multi-varieties) and three processing practices (full-wash, semi-wash and honey natural process) were investigated. The measured parameters were moisture contents and cupping quality based on Specialty Coffee Association of America (SCAA) procedure. The statistical analysis showed that local varieties and processing attributes has significant influenced (P≤0.01) on the certain sensory attributes. The interaction of both factors showed significant effects (P≤0.01) towards flavour, acidity and balance attributes. Ateng Super variety showed a high score of overall cupping attributes whilst among processing practices it showed no differences. In conclusion, all experiments produced specialty coffee based on SCAA cupping test. Ateng Super local varieties showed the highest score (85.36±0.14) and full-wash processing produced the highest cupping quality compared to others (84.79±0.03). The Q-grader also remarked that Gayo Arabica coffee has distinguished flavours such as chocolate, dark-chocolate, caramel, nutty and spicy in all experiments. However, several unpleasant remarks also appeared in honey natural process such as sour, slightly aged and over fermented taste.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Department of Agricultural Product Technology, Agriculture Faculty, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh 23111, Indonesia
2 Department of Economic Management, Economy and Business Faculty, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh 23111, Indonesia
3 Gayo Cupper Team, Simpang Mongal, Takengon, Aceh, Indonesia