It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Agonists of glucocorticoid receptor (GR) are frequently given to cancer patients with platinum-containing chemotherapy to reduce inflammation, but how GR influences tumor growth in response to platinum-based chemotherapy such as cisplatin through inflammation-independent signaling remains largely unclear. Combined genomics and transcription factor profiling reveal that MAST1, a critical platinum resistance factor that reprograms the MAPK pathway, is upregulated upon cisplatin exposure through activated transcription factor GR. Mechanistically, cisplatin binds to C622 in GR and recruits GR to the nucleus for its activation, which induces MAST1 expression and consequently reactivates MEK signaling. GR nuclear translocation and MAST1 upregulation coordinately occur in patient tumors collected after platinum treatment, and align with patient treatment resistance. Co-treatment with dexamethasone and cisplatin restores cisplatin-resistant tumor growth, whereas addition of the MAST1 inhibitor lestaurtinib abrogates tumor growth while preserving the inhibitory effect of dexamethasone on inflammation in vivo. These findings not only provide insights into the underlying mechanism of GR in cisplatin resistance but also offer an effective alternative therapeutic strategy to improve the clinical outcome of patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy with GR agonists.
Glucocorticoid receptor (GR) agonists - used in the treatment of solid malignant tumors to reduce inflammation - could potentially affect the anti-tumor activity of chemotherapy. Here, the authors identify a mechanism of cisplatin resistance observed with GR agonist treatment, and show the binding and activation of GR by cisplatin, which leads to MAST1 activation and subsequent MAPK re-activation.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 Sun Yat-sen University, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Guangzhou, China (GRID:grid.12981.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 2360 039X); Emory University School of Medicine, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory, Atlanta, USA (GRID:grid.189967.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 0941 6502)
2 Emory University School of Medicine, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory, Atlanta, USA (GRID:grid.189967.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 0941 6502)
3 Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology, New Haven, USA (GRID:grid.47100.32) (ISNI:0000000419368710)
4 Emory University School of Medicine, Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Atlanta, USA (GRID:grid.189967.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 0941 6502)
5 University of Florida, College of Medicine, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Gainesville, USA (GRID:grid.15276.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8091)