Abstract

Purpose

Axillary staging before neoadjuvant systemic therapy in clinically node-positive breast cancer patients with tailored axillary treatment according to the Marking Axillary lymph nodes with radioactive iodine seeds (MARI)-protocol, a protocol developed at the Netherlands Cancer Institute, is performed with [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT). We aimed to assess the value of FDG-PET/CT in prone compared to standard supine position for axillary staging.

Methods

We selected patients with FDG-PET/CT in supine and prone position who underwent the MARI-protocol. One hour after administration of 3.5 MBq/kg, [18F]FDG-PET was performed with a low-dose prone position CT-thorax followed by a supine whole-body scan. Scans were separately reviewed by two nuclear medicine physicians and categorized by number of FDG-positive axillary lymph nodes (ALNs; cALN<4 or cALN≥4). Main outcome was axillary up- or downstaging.

Results

Of 153 patients included, 24 (16%) patients were up- or downstaged at evaluation of prone images: One observer upstaged 14 patients, downstaged 3  patients and reported a higher number of ALNs (3.6 vs. 3.2, p < 0.001), while staging (4 up- and 5 downstaged) and number of ALNs (2.8 vs. 2.8) did not differ for the other. Observers agreed on up- or downstaging in only 1 (1%) patient. Irrespective of supine or prone position scanning, observers agreed on axillary staging in 124 (81%) patients and disagreed in 5 (3%). Interobserver agreement was lower with prone assessments (86%, K = 0.67) than supine (92%, K = 0.80).

Conclusions

Axillary staging with FDG-PET/CT in prone compared to supine position did not result in concordant up- or downstaging. Therefore, FDG-PET/CT in supine position only can be considered sufficient for axillary staging.

Details

Title
[18F]FDG-PET/CT in prone compared to supine position for optimal axillary staging and treatment in clinically node-positive breast cancer patients with neoadjuvant systemic therapy
Author
van Loevezijn Ariane A 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Stokkel Marcel P M 2 ; Donswijk, Maarten L 2 ; van Werkhoven Erik D 3 ; van der Noordaa Marieke E M 4 ; van Duijnhoven Frederieke H 4 ; Vrancken Peeters Marie-Jeanne T F D 1 

 Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Department of Surgical Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.430814.a); Amsterdam University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.509540.d) (ISNI:0000 0004 6880 3010) 
 Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.430814.a) 
 Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Department of Biometrics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.430814.a) 
 Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Department of Surgical Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.430814.a) 
Publication year
2021
Publication date
Dec 2021
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V.
e-ISSN
2191219X
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2563225216
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.