This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Introduction
Petroleum-based non-biodegradable polymeric wastes are significantly increasing the ecological impacts and creating huge global concern. Hence, there is an imperative requirement to develop eco-friendly bio-based materials to alternate the nonrenewable plastic materials [1, 2]. Cellulose derivatives, proteins, gums, lipids, and starch are well-known biopolymers that are commonly used as raw material for biodegradable films. Specifically, for packaging processed or fresh foods, these biopolymers offer significant contribution of preparing thin edible films [3]. One of the abundant, nontoxic, and renewable resources is starch that has the potential capability of forming continuous matrix [4–6]. Starch has the potential advantage of being comparatively low cost. It is able to form films that have a similar characteristic to synthetic polymers such as being odorless, transparent, and tasteless and having oxygen permeability resistance. However, the films prepared using starch generally require the amalgamation of plasticizer for reducing their brittleness. Another important ingredient for preparing eco-friendly packaging films is agar, which is a biodegradable polysaccharide [7–9]. It is used as a cohesive mediator in the polymeric chain and provides better improvisation in properties related to mechanical and barrier possessions [10, 11]. During the preparation of edible films, hydrophobic constituents (surfactants) are added to decrease the hygroscopicity of the films that can provide appreciable desirability [12]. Different studies have reported about the investigation of behavior of water-vapor permeability (WP) on edible film with respect to different factors [13]. The combined effect of starch extracted from avocado seed, agar, Tween-80, and sorbitol has not been described elsewhere. Keeping this view, it is important to study about the barrier properties with respect to different proportions of process variables to gain appropriate knowledge about the possibilities of applications for food packing materials. Hence, this investigation was aimed to investigate the effect of selected process factors, namely, avocado seed starch, agar, Tween-20, and sorbitol, on the important barrier property, WP, of an edible film. The combination of the aforementioned parameters was designed using the three-level Box–Behnken method; further, the WP of the film developed from each commination was determined and analyzed by response surface approach.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
Avocado seeds were collected from the fruit market of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia (Figure 1). Tween-20 (food grade with 99% purity) and sorbitol (food grade with 98% purity) were obtained from Hi-Media Chemicals, Addis Ababa. Agar was procured from Merck Chemicals, Addis Ababa.
[figure omitted; refer to PDF]2.2. Extraction of Avocado Seed Starch (ASS)
Avocado seeds were grounded well using the laboratory mixer-grinder. The powder was well saturated by soaking with large amounts of distilled water. Prior to this process, sodium metabisulphite was dissolved (0.075% (w/v)) with the distilled water. Further, the soaked content of material was kept to settle for 4 h at room temperature, approximately, 28 ± 2°C. Then, the clear supernatant liquid was carefully transferred to a clean beaker. The sedimented starch was washed repeatedly using sodium metabisulphite solution till the clear suspension was observed. In order to remove the cell debris, the obtained sediment was further filtered using a fine muslin cloth. From the resultant filtration, the clear suspension was collected. Again, it was filtered using 224 μm fine sieve. Subsequently, it was subjected to keep deposit. The starch was sedimented and then it was repeatedly washed using distilled water until the wash water was observed to be free of impurities and clear. As a result, the starch was isolated, then sieved, and dried in air at room temperature. In the extracted starch, the amylopectin and amylose concentrations were determined using the method explained by Nogueira et al. [14]. Presence of moisture in the starch was determined by the AOAC procedure [15].
2.3. Preparation of Edible Films
The formulation solutions to prepare the film were formulated with different combinations of agar (0.5–1.0 g), sorbitol (0.5–1.0 ml), Tween-20 (0.1–0.5 ml), and ASS (1–3 g). Casting is one of the well-recognized methods for edible film preparation. This method was adopted to develop the films by following the method specified by Sundramurthy et al. [16]. The developed clear films were carefully detached from the Petri dishes; further, they were equilibrated at 25°C with 57% relative humidity for 3 days before the experimental investigations.
2.4. Determination of Water-Vapor Permeability (WP)
For food packaging purpose, one of the important barrier properties, water-vapor permeability, is a huge concern for edible films. WP of the developed film was assessed using the method defined by Mali et al. [17]. As per the standard, ASTM D6701, WP was considered. The film thickness was assessed using an appropriate digital micrometer. WP (g/m s Pa) was detected using
2.5. Experimental Design and Statistical Analysis
In this investigation, the effect of selected factors (ASS content (F1), 1–3 g; sorbitol concentration (F2), 0.5–1.0 ml; concentration of agar (F3), 0.5–1.0 g; and Tween-20 (F4) contentment, 0.1–0.5 ml) on the WP of the edible films was studied. The Box–Behnken design (BBD) can be more effective than other design approaches. Moreover, it also needs fewer runs compared to other response surface designs. Hence, the BBD design was considered for carrying out the combination of different concentrations of selected factors. Using a nonlinear regression technique, a second-order polynomial equation was constructed using the experimental results. This model can be used to analyze the true functional relationship between WP and chosen independent factors. This equation can be written as follows:
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Chemical Composition of ASS
Figures 2(a) and 2(b) show the starch extracted from the avocado seed and edible film prepared using ASS, respectively. As per the standard procedure, the chemical composition of the ASS was determined. The results showed that the presence of the isolated starch was observed to be 97.32 ± 0.51%. Furthermore, the presence of moisture content of 10.45 ± 0.54% and ash content of 0.23 ± 0.02% was also observed. It was found that the content of amylopectin and amylose in the ASS was determined to be 71% and 29%, respectively. Generally, edible film is formed by the involvement of two different process, namely, retrogradation and gelatinization. In retrogradation, solubility of dissolved starch was decreased. During the gelatinization process, leaching of amylose present in the starch, disruption, and swelling are involved. Hence, amylose is a significant liability during edible film preparation using starch because of its capability to establish the continuous viscous mass on the film forming solutions. Additionally, amylose shows an appreciable rate in the retrogradation progression. In this study, a substantial content of the amylose was found in the ASS as reported by Bastarrachea et al. [19].
[figure omitted; refer to PDF]3.2. Experimental Design Analysis
Different combinations of process variable according to the Box–Behnken experimental design with obtained responses are presented in Table 1. Each edible film prepared from the BBD design combination was subjected to examine WP. These data were examined. Different models, namely, cubic, quadratic, interactive (2FI), and linear models, were used to get regression correlation equation. Based on the tests, namely, model summary statistics and the sequential model sum of squares, the appropriateness of equation among various models to express the effect of chosen process factors over the WP was carried out, and it is presented in Table 2.
Table 1
Design combination of process variables and obtained responses (WP).
Run no. | ASS content (g) | Sorbitol (ml) | Agar (g) | Tween-20 (ml) | WP of film (g/m·s·Pa) ×10−10 |
1 | 3 | 1 | 0.75 | 0.3 | 0.345 |
2 | 2 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.3 | 0.266 |
3 | 2 | 0.75 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.252 |
4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0.3 | 0.297 |
5 | 2 | 0.75 | 1 | 0.1 | 0.363 |
6 | 2 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.3 | 0.266 |
7 | 3 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.5 | 0.255 |
8 | 2 | 0.75 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.217 |
9 | 2 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.319 |
10 | 1 | 1 | 0.75. | 0.3 | 0.269 |
11 | 2 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.225 |
12 | 3 | 0.5 | 0.75 | 0.3 | 0.367 |
13 | 1 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.5 | 0.249 |
14 | 2 | 1 | 0.75 | 0.5 | 0.191 |
15 | 2 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.3 | 0.374 |
16 | 2 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.3 | 0.266 |
17 | 2 | 0.75 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.195 |
18 | 1 | 0.75 | 1 | 0.3 | 0.332 |
19 | 2 | 1 | 0.75 | 0.1 | 0.306 |
20 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.75 | 0.3 | 0.418 |
21 | 2 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.3 | 0.266 |
22 | 3 | 0.75 | 1 | 0.3 | 0.366 |
23 | 2 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.3 | 0.266 |
24 | 2 | 0.5 | 0.75 | 0.1 | 0.379 |
25 | 3 | 0.75 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.282 |
26 | 1 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.1 | 0.345 |
27 | 3 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.1 | 0.363 |
28 | 1 | 0.75 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.282 |
29 | 2 | 0.5 | 0.75 | 0.5 | 0.291 |
Table 2
Adequacy of tested models for WP as response.
Source | Std. dev | R2 | Adjusted R2 | Predicted R2 | PRESS | |
Linear | 0.0358 | 0.6836 | 0.6309 | 0.5285 | 0.0460 | |
2FI | 0.0367 | 0.7512 | 0.6130 | 0.2847 | 0.0697 | |
Quadratic | 0.0013 | 0.9998 | 0.9995 | 0.9986 | 0.0001 | Suggested |
Cubic | 0.0003 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.9991 | 0.0001 | Aliased |
PRESS: predicted residual error sum of squares.
From the results of the model adequacy test, it was observed that interactive (2FI) and linear models have comparatively lower value of R2, predicted R2, and adjusted R2. It was found that the cubic model can be aliased. Thus, the quadratic model for including linear, interactive, and quadratic terms was selected to express the effect of process factors on the WP of ASS-based bio-films. Additionally, adequacy of obtained quadratic model was investigated by Pareto analysis of variance.
3.3. Model Development and Statistical Analysis
The mathematical model of second-order polynomial equation (equation (3)) can be used to fit the experimental results to generate the empirical models. This equation of the model can exhibit the true correlation between WP and the selected independent factors. The obtained empirical model of quadratic form in terms of actual parameters is presented as follows:
Fisher’s F-test was used to examine the statistical significance of the obtained polynomial model using ANOVA analysis. From the analysis, it was observed that the predicted model was very good in being statistically significant (Table 3). The model F-value was found to be higher (FModel = 4102.45), and acceptable low probability value (
Table 3
ANOVA analysis for predicted second-order polynomial equation.
Source | Sum of squares | df | Mean square | F value | ||
Model | 0.0974 | 14 | 0.0070 | 4102.45 | <0.0001 | Significant |
A-starch | 0.0006 | 1 | 0.0006 | 338.41 | <0.0001 | |
B-sorbitol | 0.0221 | 1 | 0.0221 | 13028.60 | <0.0001 | |
C-agar | 0.0129 | 1 | 0.0129 | 7625.63 | <0.0001 | |
D-Tween-20 | 0.0310 | 1 | 0.0310 | 18278.60 | <0.0001 | |
AB | 0.0040 | 1 | 0.0040 | 2376.91 | <0.0001 | |
AC | 0.0003 | 1 | 0.0003 | 170.36 | <0.0001 | |
AD | 0.0000 | 1 | 0.0000 | 21.22 | 0.0004 | |
BC | 0.0001 | 1 | 0.0001 | 42.59 | <0.0001 | |
BD | 0.0002 | 1 | 0.0002 | 107.43 | <0.0001 | |
CD | 0.0020 | 1 | 0.0020 | 1167.31 | <0.0001 | |
A2 | 0.0148 | 1 | 0.0148 | 8702.87 | <0.0001 | |
B2 | 0.0085 | 1 | 0.0085 | 5012.92 | <0.0001 | |
C2 | 0.0000 | 1 | 0.0000 | 9.59 | 0.0079 | |
D2 | 0.0007 | 1 | 0.0007 | 435.04 | <0.0001 | |
Residual | 0.0000 | 14 | 1.696E − 06 | |||
Lack of fit | 0.0000 | 10 | 2.375E − 06 | Not significant | ||
Pure error | 0.0000 | 4 | 0.0000 | |||
Cor total | 0.0975 | 28 |
3.4. Response Surface Analysis for Water-Vapor Permeability
BBD coupled with RSM was used to assess the effect of four selected independent factors such as ASS (1–3 g), Tween-20 (0.1–0.5 ml), agar (0.5–1.0 g), and sorbitol (0.5–1.0 ml) on WP of the ASS-based edible films. Using a generated mathematical equation (equation (2)), plots for 3D response surface were drawn as a function of two independent factors, while the other two parameters were kept at constant. Experimental results revealed that the increase in concentration of starch and agar led to the increase in WP (Figure 3(a)).
[figures omitted; refer to PDF]
This is because of intermolecular connections becoming high between starch and agar at high concentrations. In addition, high concentrations of starch and agar increase the free space that led to extending the intermolecular distance. Normally, increment in plasticizer concentration reduces the intermolecular bonds among the polymer chains [20]. But in this case, WP of ASS films was slowly decremented with sorbitol concentration increment (Figure 3(b)). This happened due to the ineffectiveness in reducing intermolecular hydrogen bonding between amylopectin and amylose [21–23]. Additional increament in Tween-20 concentration reduces the affinity water and available number of polar groups. Hence, WP of the films were getting decremented (Figure 3(b)). From the developed model, it was observed that the concentration of starch and sorbitol had the negative effect on WP. Since the WP needs to be minimized, these factors are considered as most effective factors. Steric-hinderance structure of the Tween-20 is also responsible for the hydrophilic/lipophilic balance (HLB) ratio and hydrophobicity [24–26].
4. Conclusion
The edible film was developed using the starch extracted from avocado seeds (ASS). The combinations of different concentrations of ASS (1-3g), Tween-20 (0.1-0.5ml), agar (0.5-1.0g), and sorbitol (0.5-1.0ml) were examined for the WP. The effect of the four important process factors on the water-vapor permeability (WP) of the developed films was investigated using the three-level Box–Behnken design coupled with RSM. The developed edible films seemed to be homogenous and transparent. From the experimental results, it was found that WP of the ASS-based films decreased with increment in Tween-20 and sorbitol. It is apparent that WP is well controlled by surfactant and plasticizer concentrations. A second-order equation was constructed for WP with high value of determination coefficient (R2 = 0.99). 3D response surface plots were constructed using the experimental data that can predict the relationship between process factors and WP. From the analysis, the results showed that sorbitol and Tween-20 significantly affect the WP property of ASS-based edible film.
[1] C. G. Otoni, R. J. Avena-Bustillos, H. M. C. Azeredo, "Recent advances on edible films based on fruits and vegetables—a review," Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, vol. 16 no. 5, pp. 1151-1169, DOI: 10.1111/1541-4337.12281, 2017.
[2] R. M. S. Andrade, M. S. L. Ferreira, É. C. B. A. Gonçalves, "Development and characterization of edible films based on fruit and vegetable residues," Journal of Food Science, vol. 81 no. 2, pp. E412-E418, DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.13192, 2016.
[3] H. M. C. Azeredo, M. F. Rosa, L. H. C. Mattoso, "Nanocellulose in bio-based food packaging applications," Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 97, pp. 664-671, DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.03.013, 2017.
[4] I. Tontul, A. Topuz, "Effects of different drying methods on the physicochemical properties of pomegranate leather (pestil)," LWT, vol. 80, pp. 294-303, DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2017.02.035, 2017.
[5] R. S. Simão, J. O. Moraes, P. G. Souza, B. A. M. Carciofi, J. B. Laurindo, "Production of mango leathers by cast-tape drying: product characteristics and sensory evaluation," LWT—Food Science and Technology, vol. 99, pp. 445-452, 2019.
[6] C. A. Torres, L. A. Romero, R. I. Diaz, "Quality and sensory attributes of apple and quince leathers made without preservatives and with enhanced antioxidant activity," LWT—Food Science and Technology, vol. 62 no. 2, pp. 996-1003, DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.01.056, 2015.
[7] C. Valenzuela, J. M. Aguilera, "Effects of maltodextrin on hygroscopicity and crispness of apple leathers," Journal of Food Engineering, vol. 144,DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2014.07.010, 2015.
[8] T. H. Mchugh, C. C. Huxsoll, J. M. Krochta, "Permeability properties of fruit puree edible films," Journal of Food Science, vol. 61 no. 1, pp. 88-91, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1996.tb14732.x, 1996.
[9] C. G. Otoni, M. R. d. Moura, F. A. Aouada, "Antimicrobial and physical-mechanical properties of pectin/papaya puree/cinnamaldehyde nanoemulsion edible composite films," Food Hydrocolloids, vol. 41, pp. 188-194, DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.04.013, 2014.
[10] Z. A. Maryam Adilah, B. Jamilah, Z. A. Nur Hanani, "Functional and antioxidant properties of protein-based films incorporated with mango kernel extract for active packaging," Food Hydrocolloids, vol. 74, pp. 207-218, DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2017.08.017, 2018.
[11] C. Torres-León, A. A. Vicente, M. L. Flores-López, "Edible films and coatings based on mango (var. Ataulfo) by-products to improve gas transfer rate of peach," LWT—Food Science and Technology, vol. 97, pp. 624-631, 2018.
[12] P. B. d. F. Arquelau, V. D. M. Silva, M. A. V. T. Garcia, R. L. B. d. Araújo, C. A. Fante, "Characterization of edible coatings based on ripe “Prata” banana peel flour," Food Hydrocolloids, vol. 89, pp. 570-578, DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.11.029, 2019.
[13] H. Wu, Y. Lei, R. Zhu, "Preparation and characterization of bioactive edible packaging films based on pomelo peel flours incorporating tea polyphenol," Food Hydrocolloids, vol. 90, pp. 41-49, DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.12.016, 2019.
[14] G. F. Nogueira, C. T. Soares, R. Cavasini, F. M. Fakhouri, R. A. de Oliveira, "Bioactive films of arrowroot starch and blackberry pulp: physical, mechanical and barrier properties and stability to pH and sterilization," Food Chemistry, vol. 275, pp. 417-425, DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.09.054, 2019.
[15] X. Wang, X. Sun, H. Liu, M. Li, Z. Ma, "Barrier and mechanical properties of carrot puree films," Food and Bioproducts Processing, vol. 89 no. 2, pp. 149-156, DOI: 10.1016/j.fbp.2010.03.012, 2011.
[16] V. P. Sundramurthy, B. Rajoo, N. R. Srinivasan, R. Kavitha, "Bioleaching of Zn from sphalerite using Leptospirillum ferriphilum isolate: effect of temperature and kinetic aspects," Applied Biological Chemistry, vol. 63 no. 44,DOI: 10.1186/s13765-020-00528-8, 2020.
[17] S. Mali, M. V. E. Grossmann, M. A. Garcı́a, M. N. Martino, N. E. Zaritzky, "Barrier, mechanical and optical properties of plasticized yam starch films," Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 56 no. 2, pp. 129-135, DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2004.01.004, 2004.
[18] N. M. Malherbi, A. C. Schmitz, R. C. Grando, "Corn starch and gelatin-based films added with guabiroba pulp for application in food packaging," Food Packaging and Shelf Life, vol. 19, pp. 140-146, DOI: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2018.12.008, 2019.
[19] L. Bastarrachea, S. Dhawan, S. S. Sablani, "Engineering properties of polymeric-based antimicrobial films for food packaging: a review," Food Engineering Reviews, vol. 3 no. 2, pp. 79-93, DOI: 10.1007/s12393-011-9034-8, 2011.
[20] G. Li, P. Sarazin, W. J. Orts, S. H. Imam, B. D. Favis, "Biodegradation of thermoplastic starch and its blends with poly (lactic acid) and polyethylene: influence of morphology," Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics, vol. 212 no. 11, pp. 1147-1154, DOI: 10.1002/macp.201100090, 2011.
[21] C. G. Otoni, B. D. Lodi, M. V. Lorevice, "Optimized and scaled-up production of cellulose-reinforced biodegradable composite films made up of carrot processing waste," Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 121, pp. 66-72, DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.05.003, 2018.
[22] K. Ncama, L. S. Magwaza, A. Mditshwa, S. Z. Tesfay, "Plant-based edible coatings for managing postharvest quality of fresh horticultural produce: a review," Food Packaging and Shelf Life, vol. 16, pp. 157-167, DOI: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2018.03.011, 2018.
[23] J. Prakash Maran, V. Sivakumar, R. Sridhar, V. Prince Immanuel, "Development of model for mechanical properties of tapioca starch based edible films," Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 42, pp. 159-168, DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.05.011, 2013.
[24] S. Mustefa Beyan, S. Venkatesa Prabhu, T. K. Mumecha, M. T. Gemeda, "Production of alkaline proteases using Aspergillus sp. isolated from injera: RSM-GA based process optimization and enzyme kinetics aspect," Current Microbiology, vol. 78 no. 5, pp. 1823-1834, DOI: 10.1007/s00284-021-02446-4, 2021.
[25] P. Suppakul, R. Boonlert, W. Buaphet, P. Sonkaew, V. Luckanatinvong, "Efficacy of superior antioxidant Indian gooseberry extract-incorporated edible Indian gooseberry puree/methylcellulose composite films on enhancing the shelf life of roasted cashew nut," Food Control, vol. 69, pp. 51-60, DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.04.033, 2016.
[26] S. V. Prabhu, B. Sasikumar, "Bioleaching of arsenic from realgar Using Leptosprillum ferriphilum: effect of ferrous iron and kinetics aspects," International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering Research, vol. 8 no. 9, pp. 3080-6084, DOI: 10.30534/ijeter/2020/192892020, 2020.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright © 2021 R. Ramesh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Abstract
Starch-based edible films are gaining huge interest in food packaging industries. In the present work, avocado seed starch (ASS) was extracted and used to develop an edible film. The influence of four important process factors, starch, agar, sorbitol, and Tween-20, was studied on one of the important barrier properties, water-vapor permeability (WP), of developed edible film. The three-level RSM design with Box–Behnken approach was carried out to investigate the film property, WP. ASS-based edible films were prepared by the casting method. The results revealed that the increment in the contents of Tween-20 and sorbitol reduces the WP of the film. Using the response surface analysis, the effect of the aforementioned factors was analyzed; they showed significant impact on WP. To predict the influence of the selected process parameters, a second-order polynomial equation was constructed. Additionally, Pareto analysis of variance was employed over the obtained results to investigate the significance of the developed process model.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 Department of Chemical Engineering, College of Biological and Chemical Engineering, Addis Ababa Science and Technology University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
2 Department of Biotechnology, College of Biological and Chemical Engineering, Addis Ababa Science and Technology University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia