Abstract

More widespread use of positron emission tomography (PET) imaging is limited by its high cost and radiation dose. Reductions in PET scan time or radiotracer dosage typically degrade diagnostic image quality (DIQ). Deep-learning-based reconstruction may improve DIQ, but such methods have not been clinically evaluated in a realistic multicenter, multivendor environment. In this study, we evaluated the performance and generalizability of a deep-learning-based image-quality enhancement algorithm applied to fourfold reduced-count whole-body PET in a realistic clinical oncologic imaging environment with multiple blinded readers, institutions, and scanner types. We demonstrate that the low-count-enhanced scans were noninferior to the standard scans in DIQ (p < 0.05) and overall diagnostic confidence (p < 0.001) independent of the underlying PET scanner used. Lesion detection for the low-count-enhanced scans had a high patient-level sensitivity of 0.94 (0.83–0.99) and specificity of 0.98 (0.95–0.99). Interscan kappa agreement of 0.85 was comparable to intrareader (0.88) and pairwise inter-reader agreements (maximum of 0.72). SUV quantification was comparable in the reference regions and lesions (lowest p-value=0.59) and had high correlation (lowest CCC = 0.94). Thus, we demonstrated that deep learning can be used to restore diagnostic image quality and maintain SUV accuracy for fourfold reduced-count PET scans, with interscan variations in lesion depiction, lower than intra- and interreader variations. This method generalized to an external validation set of clinical patients from multiple institutions and scanner types. Overall, this method may enable either dose or exam-duration reduction, increasing safety and lowering the cost of PET imaging.

Details

Title
Low-count whole-body PET with deep learning in a multicenter and externally validated study
Author
Chaudhari, Akshay S 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Mittra Erik 2 ; Davidzon, Guido A 3   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Gulaka Praveen 4 ; Gandhi Harsh 4 ; Brown, Adam 2 ; Zhang, Tao 5 ; Srinivas Shyam 6 ; Gong Enhao 7 ; Zaharchuk Greg 8   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Jadvar Hossein 9   VIAFID ORCID Logo 

 Stanford University, Department of Radiology, Palo Alto, USA (GRID:grid.168010.e) (ISNI:0000000419368956); Stanford University, Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford, USA (GRID:grid.168010.e) (ISNI:0000000419368956); Subtle Medical, Menlo Park, USA (GRID:grid.168010.e) 
 Oregon Health & Science University, Division of Diagnostic Radiology, Portland, USA (GRID:grid.5288.7) (ISNI:0000 0000 9758 5690) 
 Stanford University, Department of Radiology, Palo Alto, USA (GRID:grid.168010.e) (ISNI:0000000419368956) 
 Subtle Medical, Menlo Park, USA (GRID:grid.168010.e) 
 Subtle Medical, Menlo Park, USA (GRID:grid.5288.7) 
 University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Pittsburgh, USA (GRID:grid.412689.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 0650 7433) 
 Subtle Medical, Menlo Park, USA (GRID:grid.412689.0) 
 Stanford University, Department of Radiology, Palo Alto, USA (GRID:grid.168010.e) (ISNI:0000000419368956); Subtle Medical, Menlo Park, USA (GRID:grid.168010.e) 
 University of Southern California, Department of Radiology, Los Angeles, USA (GRID:grid.42505.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2156 6853) 
Publication year
2021
Publication date
Dec 2021
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group
e-ISSN
23986352
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2563569437
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. corrected publication 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.