Role of circulating angiogenin levels in portal hypertension and TIPS

Abstract

Background

Pathogenesis of portal hypertension is multifactorial and includes pathologic intrahepatic angiogenesis, whereby TIPS insertion is an effective therapy of portal hypertension associated complications. While angiogenin is a potent contributor to angiogenesis in general, little is known about its impact on TIPS function over time.

Methods

In a total of 118 samples from 47 patients, angiogenin concentrations were measured in portal and inferior caval vein plasma at TIPS insertion (each blood compartment n = 23) or angiographic intervention after TIPS (each blood compartment n = 36) and its relationship with patient outcome was investigated.

Results

Angiogenin levels in the inferior caval vein were significantly higher compared to the portal vein (P = 0.048). Ten to 14 days after TIPS, inferior caval vein angiogenin level correlated inversely with the portal systemic pressure gradient (P<0.001), measured invasively during control angiography. Moreover, patients with TIPS revision during this angiography, showed significantly lower angiogenin level in the inferior caval vein compared to patients without TIPS dysfunction (P = 0.01).

Conclusion

In cirrhosis patients with complications of severe portal hypertension, circulating levels of angiogenin are derived from the injured liver. Moreover, angiogenin levels in the inferior caval vein after TIPS may predict TIPS dysfunction.

About the Authors:

Alexander Queck

Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0553-2391

Frank E. Uschner

Roles Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

Philip G. Ferstl

Roles Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0836-6643

Martin Schulz

Roles Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

Maximilian J. Brol

Roles Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

Michael Praktiknjo

Roles Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany

Robert Schierwagen

Roles Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

Sabine Klein

Roles Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

Christian P. Strassburg

Roles Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany

Carsten Meyer

Roles Data curation, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Department of Radiology, University Hospital, University Bonn, Bonn, Germany

Christian Jansen

Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

¶‡ These authors share last authorship on this work.

Affiliation: Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany

Marie-Luise Berres

Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

¶‡ These authors share last authorship on this work.

Affiliation: Department of Internal Medicine III, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany

Jonel Trebicka

Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

* E-mail: [email protected]

¶‡ These authors share last authorship on this work.

Affiliations Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany, European Foundation for the Study of Chronic Liver Failure, Barcelona, Spain

ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7028-3881

Introduction

Pathogenesis of portal hypertension (PH) in liver cirrhosis is multifactorial and orchestrated by an increase of sinusoidal resistance due to liver fibrosis [1], endothelial dysfunction [2], bacterial translocation [3] and rise of portal venous blood inflow secondary to splanchnic vasodilatation [4]. In addition, pathological intra- and extra-hepatic angiogenesis contributes to PH [5–7].

The severity of PH is related to disease progression and causes complications, such as ascites, bleeding from gastro-esophageal varices and renal dysfunction [8]. For treatment of PH associated complications, transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt (TIPS) insertion reduces the portal-hepatic pressure gradient (PHPG) and improves patients’ outcome [9,10]. Nevertheless, TIPS dysfunction has been a frequent complication, especially in the era of uncovered bare metal stents [11]. Usually, vascular stent insertions provoke vascular healing and remodeling cascades [12], which eventually result in reendothelialization of the vein graft [13]. However, a pathological vascular response can lead to the development of pseudo-intimal hyperplasia and thrombosis, both of which are mechanisms of TIPS dysfunction [14,15].

While angiogenesis involves several messengers like vascular endothelial-derived growth factor (VEGF) [16], one essential mediator is angiogenin (also referred as ribonuclease 5), a protein constituted of 123 amino acids and a member of the ribonuclease superfamily [17,18]. Angiogenin stimulates blood vessels growth via interaction with endothelial and smooth muscle cells [19]. To enable this process, angiogenin provides ribonucleolytic activity [20,21] and the ability for nuclear translocation with enhancement of ribosomal RNA transcription in endothelial cells [22]. Moreover, angiogenin also induces signaling transduction and basement membrane degradation [23,24]. Besides angiogenesis, angiogenin also has anti-microbial and anti-inflammatory properties and seems to be essential for the maintenance of gut microbe homeostasis [25,26].

Therefore, we hypothesized that angiogenin is involved in and essential for (i) post-TIPS vascular healing and neo-vascularization processes and (ii) the anti-inflammatory response.

Patients and methods

Study oversight

This study presents portal and inferior caval vein angiogenin levels of patients undergoing TIPS insertion, as well as of patients during control angiography after TIPS. Patients were recruited between September 1998 and August 2003 at the Department of Internal Medicine I, University of Bonn, Germany. The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee of the University of Bonn (029/13). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients before enrolment and patients agreed to all procedures as declared in the study protocol. All authors had access to the study data and reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Patients

A total of 118 samples from 47 patients with diagnosed liver cirrhosis and complications of PH was included in this study. For this purpose, angiogenin concentrations were measured in portal and inferior caval vein plasma at TIPS-insertion (each blood compartment samples n = 23) or angiographic intervention after TIPS (each blood compartment samples n = 36) (S1 Fig). Indications for TIPS insertion were secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding (n = 8; 35%), refractory ascites (n = 13; 56%) and hepatorenal syndrome (n = 2; 9%). Patients older than 18 years with clinical signs of liver cirrhosis and a multidisciplinary defined indication for TIPS insertion were included in our trial. Exclusion criteria were the presence of systemic infection, severe hepatic encephalopathy of unknown reason, severe hyperbilirubinemia, pulmonary hypertension, or pregnancy. After a mean period of 14 days after TIPS insertion, 39 patients received control angiography as a routine procedure, as previously described [27].

Study design

After study inclusion, patients received TIPS insertion or angiographic intervention after TIPS as recommended by an interdisciplinary expert team. TIPS (8–10 mm Wallstent, Boston Scientific, MA, USA) insertion was performed as previously described [28]. During the procedures (TIPS or angiographic intervention after TIPS), portal and hepatic venous pressures were invasively measured with a pressure transducer system (Combitrans, Braun, Melsungen, Germany) and a multichannel monitor (Sirecust, Siemens, Germany). Per definition, the difference between the portal and hepatic venous pressure was defined as PHPG. After cannulating the right branch of the portal vein, we harvested blood from the portal and the inferior caval vein (at the level of the hepatic veins) in EDTA tubes to obtain material for angiogenin analysis. If invasive flow criteria for TIPS dysfunction (shunt stenosis>50%, occlusion or flow reduction) were fulfilled during control angiography, TIPS revision was performed. All TIPS insertions or angiographic interventions after TIPS were performed without general anesthesia. After collection of the patient’s blood, we centrifuged the samples at 3000 revolutions per minute for 15 minutes at 4°C. Next, plasma samples were stored at -80°C. Biochemical parameters were analyzed using standard methods.

Measurement of angiogenin concentrations

Plasma concentrations of angiogenin were assessed with a cytometric bead array (Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, quantified in undiluted samples in duplicates.

Statistical analyses

GraphPad Prism 9.1.2 (GraphPad Software, Inc.) and BIAS® (version 11.08) for Windows were used for the performance of statistical analysis. To check for normal distribution, the D’Agostino and Pearson omnibus normality test was performed. Parametric (unpaired T-test) or nonparametric (Mann-Whitney) tests were applied accordingly. For analyses of paired observations, such as angiogenin progression over time, the paired T-test (parametric) or the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test (non-parametric) were used. For analysis of correlations, the nonparametric Spearmen’s or the parametric Pearson’s correlation were used. P values <0.05 were defined as statistically significant.

Results

Angiogenin levels are higher in the inferior caval vein compared to the portal vein

Angiogenin level were measured in the portal and the inferior caval vein blood of patients with decompensated cirrhosis at TIPS insertion (each compartment: n = 23). At the time of TIPS insertion, covert hepatic encephalopathy was present in four patients (17%), and 65% of the patients presented with refractory ascites. Mean MELD score at TIPS insertion was 14 and most of the patients were classified as Child-Pugh B (74%), with a mean score of 8. Patients presented with mean low platelet counts (122/μL), and hypoalbuminemia (3.1 g/dL). Mean PHPG was 21 mmHg at, and 9 mmHg after TIPS insertion. As expected after TIPS creatinine levels decreased, while platelet counts and gamma-glutamyltransferase levels increased (S1 Table). Mean portal vein angiogenin levels were significantly lower compared to the levels in the inferior caval vein (portal vein: 2027 ng/mL; inferior caval vein: 2321 ng/mL; P = 0.048) (Table 1) (Fig 1). We observed neither a significant difference, nor a correlation between angiogenin concentrations and the year of blood sampling (S2 Fig).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 1. Portal and inferior caval vein levels of angiogenin at TIPS insertion.

For statistical analysis, the paired t-test was used (P = 0.048) and presented as scatter plot. TIPS: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. n = 23.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256473.g001

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 1. Characteristics of patients at TIPS insertion.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256473.t001

Angiogenin concentrations in the inferior caval vein are inversely correlated with PHPG after TIPS

Angiogenin levels were measured in 72 samples of 39 patients in portal and inferior caval vein plasma (each compartment: n = 36) of 39 patients receiving control angiography after TIPS insertion. At this timepoint, mean MELD score was 10, while hypoalbuminemia (3.0 g/dL), low platelet count (125/μL) and increased GGT levels (151 U/I) were observed as surrogate markers of advanced liver disease and PH. Mean angiogenin levels in the portal and the inferior caval vein were not significantly different (portal vein: 2014 ng/mL and inferior caval vein: 2282ng/mL; P = 0.4) (Table 2). Twenty-two of the 39 patients (56%) received TIPS revision due to TIPS dysfunction, defined by radiological flow criteria at control angiography, whereby MELD score and other general laboratory parameters were not significantly different between patients with and without TIPS dysfunction. Nevertheless, patients with dysfunction showed significantly lower angiogenin levels in the inferior caval vein compared to patients without (1961 ng/mL versus 2641 ng/mL; P = 0.014) (Table 2) (Fig 2). In these cases, the area under the ROC curve of angiogenin for TIPS dysfunction was 0.74 (0.6–0.9, P = 0.01) (Fig 3). Moreover, inferior caval vein angiogenin levels were inversely correlated with PHPG at control angiography in all patients, regardless of TIPS function (R = -0.55; P<0.001) (Fig 4).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 2. Angiogenin levels in the inferior caval vein during follow-up angiography.

Differences between inferior caval vein angiogenin levels in dependency of the need for TIPS revision at control angiography (P = 0.01). For statistical analysis, the unpaired t-test was used and presented as scatter plot with mean and standard error of the mean. TIPS: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. n = 36.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256473.g002

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 3. AUROC of angiogenin for TIPS dysfunction.

The area under the ROC curve of angiogenin for TIPS dysfunction was 0.74 (0.6–0.9); P = 0.01. TIPS: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. n = 36.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256473.g003

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 4. Correlation between angiogenin level in the inferior caval vein at follow-up angiography and portal hepatic pressure gradient.

Pearson’s correlation test was used for analysis of correlations between portal hepatic pressure gradient and inferior caval vein angiogenin levels at follow up angiography. TIPS: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. n = 36.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256473.g004

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 2. Characteristics of patients at follow-up angiography.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256473.t002

Angiogenin correlates with the level of systemic inflammation at control angiography after TIPS

While systemic white blood cell count and angiogenin levels in the inferior caval vein during TIPS insertion did not correlate (R = 0.02, P = 0.36), significant correlations between systemic white blood cell count and angiogenin concentrations in the inferior caval vein were observed at control angiography after TIPS (R = 0.38, P = 0.026) (Fig 5).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 5. Correlation between inferior caval vein angiogenin concentrations and systemic white blood cell count at control angiography.

Pearson’s correlation test was used for analysis of correlations between systemic WBC and inferior caval vein angiogenin level during control angiography. WBC: White blood cell count. n = 34.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256473.g005

Discussion

This study demonstrates that the injured liver is the major source of angiogenin in patients with complications of PH receiving TIPS. Furthermore, inferior caval vein angiogenin concentrations were correlated with PHPG after TIPS insertion. Hence, inferior caval vein angiogenin levels may predict TIPS dysfunction.

This study analyzed the source of angiogenin. Since higher angiogenin concentrations were measured in the inferior caval vein than in the portal vein, the main source of angiogenin in decompensated cirrhosis may be the diseased liver. While decompensation of cirrhosis leads to upregulation of pro-inflammatory [29] as well as pro-angiogenic signaling [30], both mechanisms could trigger hepatic angiogenin expression, possibly because PH is due to vascular remodeling and endothelial dysfunction associated with—and caused by dysregulated angiogenesis [31]. Nevertheless, the inferior caval vein angiogenin concentrations did not correlate with the level of PHPG at TIPS insertion. This strong inverse correlation between inferior caval vein angiogenin levels and PHPG only occurred during control angiography, 14 days after TIPS. Interestingly, lower angiogenin concentrations in the inferior caval vein were measured in patients with TIPS dysfunction. Therefore, one may hypothesize that an acute event, such as TIPS insertion itself and/or in-stent thrombosis influences the angiogenin expression. In line with this hypothesis, in-vivo studies of angiogenin during angiogenic and remodeling processes, such as placental growth in pregnancy, reported insufficient angiogenin concentrations to be associated with pathological blood flow [32]. Therefore, one explanation for the relationship between angiogenin levels and post-TIPS PHPG may be a pathological vascular response with consecutive inaccurate reendothelialization of TIPS and/or inadequate remodeling (healing) of the hepatic vascular bed. Thus, this pathologic response in post-TIPS angiogenesis signaling could increase the risk of pseudo-intimal hyperplasia and/or TIPS thrombosis, leading to TIPS dysfunction. This possibly explains why lower angiogenin levels were associated with TIPS dysfunction.

Another—and maybe synergetic—effect could be flow dependency of angiogenin. Patients with TIPS dysfunction and, therefore, reduced sinusoidal perfusion may have a lower hepatic angiogenin release compared to patients with adequate TIPS perfusion.

Moreover, angiogenin seems to be regulated as an acute phase protein [33], probably because of the reported involvement in the innate immunity [34]. Along these lines, previous studies have demonstrated that interleukin 6 (IL-6), a pro-inflammatory mediator, induced synthesis and secretion of angiogenin in a human hepatic (HEPG2) cell line [35]. Of note, bacterial translocation in decompensated cirrhosis is also known to generate high IL-6 concentrations and is associated with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) [36] and platelet activation [37]. In our patients this correlation between angiogenin and inflammation was also observed. High post-TIPS angiogenin levels in the inferior caval vein correlated with high white blood cell counts. Since higher angiogenin concentrations also correlated with better TIPS function, it may be hypothesized that post-TIPS angiogenin secretion, influenced by pro-inflammatory signaling, is also protecting the hepatic vascular system against this pro-inflammatory damage. This is nicely paralleled by the fact that angiogenin is a known initiator of the stress response process in mammalian cells [38] and plays a protective role in hypoxic-induced cellular damage [39,40]. Moreover, this bacterial translocation and inflammation may also have a strong effect on platelet aggregation in decompensated cirrhosis [37], and could be related to TIPS dysfunction. The anti-pathogenic and anti-inflammatory capabilities of angiogenin may have anti-thrombotic effects via reduced activation of platelet aggregation and therefore improve TIPS function.

There exist no reliable markers of TIPS dysfunction to date. Angiogenin may be useful for the non-invasive diagnosis of TIPS dysfunction, especially since ultrasound indications of TIPS dysfunction are not always conclusive.

This pilot study has several limitations. First, a control group of healthy individuals is missing. In addition, the sample size is small and monocentric, while a validation cohort for angiogenin is not available. Moreover, a change over time of angiogenin concentrations cannot be excluded. Nevertheless, no correlation between angiogenin levels and the timepoint of sampling was found. Also, a relationship between angiogenin and SPSS (spontaneous portosystemic shunts) cannot be excluded. Finally, although we sampled the blood from the inferior caval vein at the level of the hepatic veins, we cannot exclude venous admixture, originating from other organs.

In summary, post-TIPS angiogenin expression seems to be beneficial. Thus, angiogenin may play a relevant role not only in vascular healing processes, but also in the inflammatory response and coagulation conditions of the blood in the hepatic compartment. In conclusion, while angiogenin may be useful as a non-invasive marker of TIPS dysfunction, further validation is required.

Supporting information

S1 Fig.

Number of patients at TIPS insertion and control angiography (A) and number of plasma samples in the portal and inferior caval vein at TIPS insertion and control angiography (B).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256473.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig.

Angiogenin concentrations in dependency of the year of blood sampling A) 1998–2000 vs. 2001–2003 B) Correlation between angiogenin concentrations and the year of blood sampling. A) For statistical analysis, the unpaired t-test was used (P = 0.1) and presented as scatter plot. Samples: 1998–2000 n = 48 and 2001–2003 n = 70. B) For statistical analysis Pearson’s correlation test was used (P = 0.79). Samples n = 118.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256473.s002

(TIF)

S1 Table. General characteristics of the subset of patients sampled at TIPS, as well as at the control angiography.

GGT: Gamma-glutamyltransferase; GPT: Glutamate pyruvate transaminase; INR: International normalized ratio; MELD: Model for end-stage liver disease; WBC: White blood cell count.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256473.s003

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We thank Gudrun Hack, Silke Bellinghausen, Nadine Köstlmeier, and Kristin Gehrmann for excellent technical assistance.

Citation: Queck A, Uschner FE, Ferstl PG, Schulz M, Brol MJ, Praktiknjo M, et al. (2021) Role of circulating angiogenin levels in portal hypertension and TIPS. PLoS ONE 16(8): e0256473. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256473

References

1. Sanyal AJ, Bosch J, Blei A, Arroyo V. Portal hypertension and its complications. Gastroenterology. 2008 May;134(6):1715–28. pmid:18471549

2. Bosch J, Groszmann RJ, Shah VH. Evolution in the understanding of the pathophysiological basis of portal hypertension: How changes in paradigm are leading to successful new treatments. J Hepatol. 2015 Apr;62(1 Suppl):S121–130. pmid:25920081

3. Wiest R, Garcia-Tsao G. Bacterial translocation (BT) in cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2005 Mar;41(3):422–33. pmid:15723320

4. García-Pagán J-C, Gracia-Sancho J, Bosch J. Functional aspects on the pathophysiology of portal hypertension in cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2012 Aug;57(2):458–61. pmid:22504334

5. Bosch J, Abraldes JG, Fernández M, García-Pagán JC. Hepatic endothelial dysfunction and abnormal angiogenesis: new targets in the treatment of portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2010 Sep;53(3):558–67. pmid:20561700

6. Schwabl P, Payer BA, Grahovac J, Klein S, Horvatits T, Mitterhauser M, et al. Pioglitazone decreases portosystemic shunting by modulating inflammation and angiogenesis in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic portal hypertensive rats. J Hepatol. 2014 Jun;60(6):1135–42. pmid:24530596

7. Fernandez M, Vizzutti F, Garcia-Pagan JC, Rodes J, Bosch J. Anti-VEGF receptor-2 monoclonal antibody prevents portal-systemic collateral vessel formation in portal hypertensive mice. Gastroenterology. 2004 Mar;126(3):886–94. pmid:14988842

8. Bosch J, García-Pagán JC. Complications of cirrhosis. I. Portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2000;32(1 Suppl):141–56. pmid:10728801

9. Angeli P, Bernardi M, Villanueva C, Francoz C, Mookerjee RP, Trebicka J, et al. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with decompensated cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2018 Aug;69(2):406–60. pmid:29653741

10. Bureau C, Thabut D, Oberti F, Dharancy S, Carbonell N, Bouvier A, et al. Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunts With Covered Stents Increase Transplant-Free Survival of Patients With Cirrhosis and Recurrent Ascites. Gastroenterology. 2017 Jan;152(1):157–63. pmid:27663604

11. Perarnau JM, Le Gouge A, Nicolas C, d’Alteroche L, Borentain P, Saliba F, et al. Covered vs. uncovered stents for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: a randomized controlled trial. J Hepatol. 2014 May;60(5):962–8. pmid:24480619

12. Ong ATL, Aoki J, Kutryk MJ, Serruys PW. How to accelerate the endothelialization of stents. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 2005 Feb;98(2):123–6. pmid:15787303

13. Sottiurai VS, Yao JS, Flinn WR, Batson RC. Intimal hyperplasia and neointima: An ultrastructural analysis of thrombosed grafts in humans. Surgery. 1983 Jun;93(6):809–17. pmid:6222499

14. LaBerge JM, Ferrell LD, Ring EJ, Gordon RL, Lake JR, Roberts JP, et al. Histopathologic study of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. J Vasc Interv Radiol JVIR. 1991 Nov;2(4):549–56. pmid:1797223

15. LaBerge JM, Ferrell LD, Ring EJ, Gordon RL. Histopathologic study of stenotic and occluded transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. J Vasc Interv Radiol JVIR. 1993 Dec;4(6):779–86. pmid:8281000

16. Apte RS, Chen DS, Ferrara N. VEGF in Signaling and Disease: Beyond Discovery and Development. Cell. 2019 Mar 7;176(6):1248–64. pmid:30849371

17. Fett JW, Strydom DJ, Lobb RR, Alderman EM, Bethune JL, Riordan JF, et al. Isolation and characterization of angiogenin, an angiogenic protein from human carcinoma cells. Biochemistry. 1985 Sep;24(20):5480–6. pmid:4074709

18. Tello-Montoliu A, Patel JV, Lip GYH. Angiogenin: a review of the pathophysiology and potential clinical applications. J Thromb Haemost JTH. 2006 Sep;4(9):1864–74. pmid:16961595

19. Kishimoto K, Liu S, Tsuji T, Olson KA, Hu G-F. Endogenous angiogenin in endothelial cells is a general requirement for cell proliferation and angiogenesis. Oncogene. 2005 Jan 13;24(3):445–56. pmid:15558023

20. Shapiro R, Vallee BL. Human placental ribonuclease inhibitor abolishes both angiogenic and ribonucleolytic activities of angiogenin. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1987 Apr 1;84(8):2238–41. pmid:3470787

21. Leland PA, Staniszewski KE, Park C, Kelemen BR, Raines RT. The Ribonucleolytic Activity of Angiogenin †. Biochemistry. 2002 Jan;41(4):1343–50. pmid:11802736

22. Moroianu J, Riordan JF. Nuclear translocation of angiogenin in proliferating endothelial cells is essential to its angiogenic activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1994 Mar 1;91(5):1677–81. pmid:8127865

23. Gao X, Xu Z. Mechanisms of action of angiogenin. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin. 2008 Jul;40(7):619–24. pmid:18604453

24. Sheng J, Xu Z. Three decades of research on angiogenin: a review and perspective. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin. 2016 May;48(5):399–410. pmid:26705141

25. Hooper LV, Stappenbeck TS, Hong CV, Gordon JI. Angiogenins: a new class of microbicidal proteins involved in innate immunity. Nat Immunol. 2003 Mar;4(3):269–73. pmid:12548285

26. Sun D, Bai R, Zhou W, Yao Z, Liu Y, Tang S, et al. Angiogenin maintains gut microbe homeostasis by balancing α-Proteobacteria and Lachnospiraceae. Gut. 2020 Aug 25. pmid:32843357

27. Trebicka J, Krag A, Gansweid S, Schiedermaier P, Strunk HM, Fimmers R, et al. Soluble TNF-Alpha-Receptors I Are Prognostic Markers in TIPS-Treated Patients with Cirrhosis and Portal Hypertension. Ahlenstiel G, editor. PLoS ONE. 2013 Dec 26;8(12):e83341. pmid:24386183

28. Trebicka J, Krag A, Gansweid S, Appenrodt B, Schiedermaier P, Sauerbruch T, et al. Endotoxin and tumor necrosis factor-receptor levels in portal and hepatic vein of patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis receiving elective transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Nov;23(12):1218–25. pmid:21971377

29. Arroyo V, Angeli P, Moreau R, Jalan R, Clària J, Trebicka J, et al. The systemic inflammation hypothesis: Towards a new paradigm of acute decompensation and multiorgan failure in cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2021 Mar;74(3):670–85. pmid:33301825

30. Simbrunner B, Mandorfer M, Trauner M, Reiberger T. Gut-liver axis signaling in portal hypertension. World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Oct 21;25(39):5897–917. pmid:31660028

31. Serrano CA, Ling SC, Verdaguer S, León M, Jarufe N, Guerra JF, et al. Portal Angiogenesis in Chronic Liver Disease Patients Correlates with Portal Pressure and Collateral Formation. Dig Dis Basel Switz. 2019;37(6):498–508. pmid:31067534

32. Kolben M., Bläser J, Ulm K, Schmitt M, Schneider KT, Tschesche H, et al. Angiogenin plasma levels during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Jan;176(1 Pt 1):37–41. pmid:9024086

33. Olson KA, Verselis SJ, Fett JW. Angiogenin is regulated in vivo as an acute phase protein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998 Jan 26;242(3):480–3. pmid:9464241

34. Park J, Kim JT, Lee SJ, Kim JC. The Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Angiogenin in an Endotoxin Induced Uveitis in Rats. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Jan 9;21(2).

35. Verselis SJ, Olson KA, Fett JW. Regulation of angiogenin expression in human HepG2 hepatoma cells by mediators of the acute-phase response. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999 May 27;259(1):178–84. pmid:10334936

36. Praktiknjo M, Monteiro S, Grandt J, Kimer N, Madsen JL, Werge MP, et al. Cardiodynamic state is associated with systemic inflammation and fatal acute-on-chronic liver failure. Liver Int Off J Int Assoc Study Liver. 2020 Jun;40(6):1457–66. pmid:32162397

37. Queck A, Carnevale R, Uschner FE, Schierwagen R, Klein S, Jansen C, et al. Role of portal venous platelet activation in patients with decompensated cirrhosis and TIPS. Gut. 2020 Aug;69(8):1535–6. pmid:31270166

38. Emara MM, Ivanov P, Hickman T, Dawra N, Tisdale S, Kedersha N, et al. Angiogenin-induced tRNA-derived Stress-induced RNAs Promote Stress-induced Stress Granule Assembly. J Biol Chem. 2010 Apr;285(14):10959–68. pmid:20129916

39. Marek-Trzonkowska N, Kwieczyńska A, Reiwer-Gostomska M, Koliński T, Molisz A, Siebert J. Arterial Hypertension Is Characterized by Imbalance of Pro-Angiogenic versus Anti-Angiogenic Factors. PloS One. 2015;10(5):e0126190. pmid:25951297

40. Sebastià J, Kieran D, Breen B, King MA, Netteland DF, Joyce D, et al. Angiogenin protects motoneurons against hypoxic injury. Cell Death Differ. 2009 Sep;16(9):1238–47. pmid:19444281