It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The Force Concept Inventory (FCI) has been used as a research instrument and to evaluate the conceptual understanding of students since it was first published in 1992. It is commonly used to assess the formation of conceptual structures in the minds of students who are learning Newtonian dynamics. For this reason it is vital that both researchers and teachers are assured that such conceptual coherence does, in fact, appear in FCI data, and are aware of the differences between Newtonian concepts as they appear in experts, and as they appear in students. The research presented here provides evidence that this conceptual coherence exists in FCI response data. This evidence is the result of a careful factor analysis of such data and we present the factor structure found in this analysis. This factor structure does not correspond exactly to the conceptual structure proposed by the authors of the FCI and thus is evidence of the difference between expert and novice conceptualisations of Newtonian Mechanics. Furthermore, we also provide an item response analysis of FCI data which is able to provide us with a better understanding of the specific abilities developed by our students and the interactions between these abilities as student obtain mastery of Newtonian ideas.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Department of Physics, University of Otago, Dunedin 9106, New Zealand