It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Despite progressive improvements over the decades, the rich temporally resolved data in an echocardiogram remain underutilized. Human assessments reduce the complex patterns of cardiac wall motion, to a small list of measurements of heart function. All modern echocardiography artificial intelligence (AI) systems are similarly limited by design – automating measurements of the same reductionist metrics rather than utilizing the embedded wealth of data. This underutilization is most evident where clinical decision making is guided by subjective assessments of disease acuity. Predicting the likelihood of developing post-operative right ventricular failure (RV failure) in the setting of mechanical circulatory support is one such example. Here we describe a video AI system trained to predict post-operative RV failure using the full spatiotemporal density of information in pre-operative echocardiography. We achieve an AUC of 0.729, and show that this ML system significantly outperforms a team of human experts at the same task on independent evaluation.
The echocardiogram allows for a comprehensive assessment of the cardiac musculature and valves, but its rich temporally resolved data remain underutilized. Here, the authors develop a video AI system trained to predict post-operative right ventricular failure.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details








1 Stanford University, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford, USA (GRID:grid.168010.e) (ISNI:0000000419368956)
2 Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart Centre, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Houston, USA (GRID:grid.63368.38) (ISNI:0000 0004 0445 0041)
3 Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart Centre, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Houston, USA (GRID:grid.63368.38) (ISNI:0000 0004 0445 0041)
4 Spectrum Health Grand Rapids, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Grand Rapids, USA (GRID:grid.416230.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 0406 3236)
5 Stanford University, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford, USA (GRID:grid.168010.e) (ISNI:0000000419368956)
6 Stanford University, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford, USA (GRID:grid.168010.e) (ISNI:0000000419368956); Stanford Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Centre, Stanford, USA (GRID:grid.168010.e)
7 Columbia University, Department of Statistics, New York, USA (GRID:grid.21729.3f) (ISNI:0000000419368729)
8 Stanford Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Centre, Stanford, USA (GRID:grid.21729.3f); Stanford University, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Informatics, Stanford, USA (GRID:grid.168010.e) (ISNI:0000000419368956)
9 Stanford University, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford, USA (GRID:grid.168010.e) (ISNI:0000000419368956); Stanford Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Centre, Stanford, USA (GRID:grid.168010.e)