It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Pedigree information is of fundamental importance in breeding programs and related genetics efforts. However, many individuals have unknown pedigrees. While methods to identify and confirm direct parent–offspring relationships are routine, those for other types of close relationships have yet to be effectively and widely implemented with plants, due to complications such as asexual propagation and extensive inbreeding. The objective of this study was to develop and demonstrate methods that support complex pedigree reconstruction via the total length of identical by state haplotypes (referred to in this study as “summed potential lengths of shared haplotypes”, SPLoSH). A custom Python script, HapShared, was developed to generate SPLoSH data in apple and sweet cherry. HapShared was used to establish empirical distributions of SPLoSH data for known relationships in these crops. These distributions were then used to estimate previously unknown relationships. Case studies in each crop demonstrated various pedigree reconstruction scenarios using SPLoSH data. For cherry, a full-sib relationship was deduced for ‘Emperor Francis, and ‘Schmidt’, a half-sib relationship for ‘Van’ and ‘Windsor’, and the paternal grandparents of ‘Stella’ were confirmed. For apple, 29 cultivars were found to share an unknown parent, the pedigree of the unknown parent of ‘Cox’s Pomona’ was reconstructed, and ‘Fameuse’ was deduced to be a likely grandparent of ‘McIntosh’. Key genetic resources that enabled this empirical study were large genome-wide SNP array datasets, integrated genetic maps, and previously identified pedigree relationships. Crops with similar resources are also expected to benefit from using HapShared for empowering pedigree reconstruction.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Carl von Ossietzky University, Institut für Biologie und Umweltwissenschaften, Oldenburg, Germany (GRID:grid.5560.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 1009 3608); University of Minnesota, Department of Horticultural Science, St. Paul, USA (GRID:grid.17635.36) (ISNI:0000000419368657)
2 Washington State University, Pullman, Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Washington, USA (GRID:grid.30064.31) (ISNI:0000 0001 2157 6568)
3 University of Minnesota, Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, Minneapolis, USA (GRID:grid.17635.36) (ISNI:0000000419368657)
4 University of Minnesota, Department of Horticultural Science, St. Paul, USA (GRID:grid.17635.36) (ISNI:0000000419368657)
5 Université d’Angers, Institut Agro, INRAE, IRHS, QuaSaV, France (GRID:grid.7252.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2248 3363)
6 Wageningen University and Research, Plant Breeding, Wageningen, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.4818.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 0791 5666)